*Originally posted by CounslerCoffee
But one that no one seems to of mentioned is that maybe in the beginning there was absolutely nothing.*
Nothing new there.
It's been done and it's called the big bang.
There is a problem, tho.
Your next claim has to be that nothing exploded, and since there was nothing in the beginning in your theory, there was also no reason AND no way for it to happen.
Sounds like a completely daft theory, not to mention contradictory.
*So that nothings became something! Are you guys understanding what Im saying so far?*
Yes, we get that you haven't spent much time on this.
*So maybe God was that something, or maybe space was that something. But my whole main point is that if your saying that there was nothing before then there had to of been something.*
Yes, but that doesn't follow from what you were saying earlier.
*The universe implied itself!*
Of course, earlier your point was that one thing implied its opposite.
But one that no one seems to of mentioned is that maybe in the beginning there was absolutely nothing.*
Nothing new there.
It's been done and it's called the big bang.
There is a problem, tho.
Your next claim has to be that nothing exploded, and since there was nothing in the beginning in your theory, there was also no reason AND no way for it to happen.
Sounds like a completely daft theory, not to mention contradictory.
*So that nothings became something! Are you guys understanding what Im saying so far?*
Yes, we get that you haven't spent much time on this.
*So maybe God was that something, or maybe space was that something. But my whole main point is that if your saying that there was nothing before then there had to of been something.*
Yes, but that doesn't follow from what you were saying earlier.
*The universe implied itself!*
Of course, earlier your point was that one thing implied its opposite.