Baron Max Banned Again?

Status
Not open for further replies.
do you think posting private reports publically is acceptable, given the fact they are supposed to be confidential? Do you?


yeah. Ever since the policy changed that it is acceptable to make threats to another member to go after him outside the forum I think quoting PMs or 'personal' reports is a minor offense. Or no offense whatsoever compared to the first mentioned one.
 
What is the point of PM's and personal reports if they're liable to be publicised by a... moderator, of all people. Do you want to do away with all confidentiality?
 
yeah. Ever since the policy changed that it is acceptable to make threats to another member to go after him outside the forum I think quoting PMs or 'personal' reports is a minor offense. Or no offense whatsoever compared to the first mentioned one.

I don't understand your reply I am asking you specifically about mod posting private reports.

You are saying you think its ok for Goofy to post private reports

ok but

in doing so we can no longer make private reports, we may as well just post public ones. Which means for those not wishing to make their feelings public, they have no chance to report an abuse of a member or forum rule.

The report feature is there for mods as much as anyone else, what point if no one can use it?

Do you really support the removal of the 'report feature'?
 
Last edited:
Are you serious?
You ubet your sweet ass I am.
I am as serious about this as just about anything I have posted in this forum. Most discussions relate to opinions and have little or no effect upon our lives. This relates to our position and role within the forum. Frankly, goofy fish's action in this matter is utterly despicable. It is a gross abuse of his power as a moderator. Only his positive contribution to the forum in the past prevented me from requesting the removal of his moderator powers.
I am sickened, literally, by his cavalier behaviour in this matter, and frankly surprised by your apparent approval of this invasion of privacy.
 
Invasion of pricvacy? Hardly.

I can certainly accept responsibility for lapse in judgement.
As such, I offer my apology for violating Zakariya's trust here.

:m: Peace.
 
Thank you for the apology.

I fail to see, however, how you can call it anything other than an invasion of privacy. Zakiriya made a report with, I believe, the expectation that its contents were between him and the mods/admins of the forum. That's the private part.
You posted it in public. That's the invasion part.

What's so difficult to understand?
 
Well, ophiolite, as I explained before nobody gave a shit before when threats were made to take the conflict outside this forum. I that light I can't really give a rat's ass about a report being quoted that has no information in it other than what is quite visible in this forum.

Furthermore the reporter is apparently a sock puppet whose main aim is to elicit a response if I have to believe the latest gossip. A sockpuppet and a troll interacting leading to a chair-dance of banishment.

In short I would have liked to have seen such a strong reaction to matters that really matter. This is rather approaching nothing.
 
nobody gave a shit before when threats were made to take the conflict outside this forum. I that light I can't really give a rat's ass about a report being quoted that has no information in it other than what is quite visible in this forum.

.


You overlook the fact that up until very recently, decent moderation of this forum was quite conspicuous by its very absence.
 
Hmm. I used the word "cunt" over 100 times in a single post regarding tiassa once. *sigh*

Sadly I still feel right in having done so. You'd have to have been there.

Or I suppose there are archives, but how boring. *shrug*

pardon.
 
Hmm. I used the word "cunt" over 100 times in a single post regarding tiassa once. *sigh*

Sadly I still feel right in having done so. You'd have to have been there.

Or I suppose there are archives, but how boring. *shrug*

pardon.

Literally over a 100 times?
 
Zakiriya04 submitted a confidential report on a post by Baron Max. I think it is reasonable and normal to believe that such reports remain confidential unless the reporter wishes it to be public.

Goofy Fish then chose to publicly reveal not only that Zakirya had made such a report, but posted the post itself.

I have reported GoofyFish for this gross abuse of moderator power via the following report:
Posting the contents of reports submitted in confidence is wholly unacceptable:
It flies in the face of forum convention.
It is is rude.
It is invasive.
It is prejudcial.
It is unethical.

Please have goofyfish apologise publicly for this gross violation of convention and good manners.


Man, you were wholly out of line.

Pardon but have you confirmed that he did not have Zak's permission?
 
Well. It's a good thing you stopped when you did. There's an ancient legend that states if cunt is said 121 times in a single post, then the chains holding back the fenris wolf will break and Ragnarok will begin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top