Define 'this'.
BOOGABOOBABOO: Gendanken's Free Thoughting Vagina in Free Thoughts
- Thread starter gendanken
- Start date
Oh.
Probably not.
Unless you're jewish?
Probably not.
Unless you're jewish?
Only to a jew.
Whose paintings? Are you saying art is superfluous?
Bells
Staff member
Ya. My apologies about that. I didn't help in that regard.
Just so god damn tiring to see this being consistently hashed over and over and the obvious point being missed repeatedly.
I'll shut up now.
Thought not. Anyone who takes shots like that can't be vested in the purely apparent.
Bells,
My "shut the fuck up about it" was directed towards Malakas and his whiny "this thread is off-topic why aren't you deleting all the off-topic posts". He's just pissy because I decided to keep another thread on topic and lashing out about it here since I kept deleting his bullshit over there.
You're free to bash your head against Geoff's wall all you like. You're not going to get anywhere though.
Reminds me of jews at the wailing wall. Their persistence is actually wearing the wall down, but they've been at it for generations. You need that kind of persistence to get through to a jew.
My "shut the fuck up about it" was directed towards Malakas and his whiny "this thread is off-topic why aren't you deleting all the off-topic posts". He's just pissy because I decided to keep another thread on topic and lashing out about it here since I kept deleting his bullshit over there.
You're free to bash your head against Geoff's wall all you like. You're not going to get anywhere though.
Reminds me of jews at the wailing wall. Their persistence is actually wearing the wall down, but they've been at it for generations. You need that kind of persistence to get through to a jew.
Bells
Staff member
What's the point really?
As you say, I won't get anywhere. I'd only be accused of being a "self-indulgent little child" and told to "shut up". Maybe one day he will get it. I doubt I'll be around to see that day. Life to live and things to do, and so forth.
Yes! Terrible.
All right, just about had it with the lot. You idiots fail to realize that I'm referring to this:
and then cited this:
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1806489&postcount=38
To which I pointed out this:
*********************************************************************
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1806751&postcount=43
*********************************************************************
So "the Jew" issue has not a damn thing to do with her whining thread on juvenile outrage at being caught out, but rather about her Freudian slip and her citation of a vicious Holocaust denier, and then failure to back down a whit.
Some Fisking:
Invert has it right: you have come late to the dinner and picked up the conversation halfway through. I refer to the section above, not the idiotic "the Jew" thread that Gen contrived when she felt the room's corners bumping into her posterior. Nor have I complained at the "consciousness-raising" usage of "the Jew" which you, invert, and everyone else seems to have taken delight in engaging in. Have I, you fool, as you insist? Where? Are you even infinitesimally aware that I know and recognize the difference between actual opinion and ironic diatribe? NO, you do not so seem; and the rest of you borderline this also. Fine. You are entitled to your ignorance, and your opinions. In a curious non-sequitur, you demand I speak up for homosexual rights in Catholicism. Well, I have, as we've discussed. What I have not done, to actually parallel Gendy and make your comments legitimate, is to post my complaints that "them homersektuals has too much power in Washington, mmm-hmmm, and they weren't never discriminated agin, nope". That would be an actual parallel. Twit.
Well, she illustrated it marvellously by citing a vicious racist. I confess myself ashamed. It was me who was evil all along.
As for invert: apparently objecting to Gen's citation of a Holocaust denier is obsessive. Right. You complain that no one has ever learned anything from the issue of genocide, and yet there you go, rubbing Gen's bottom after a well-deserved spanking. You all leap on the attack, and I'm forced to defend myself as your little club closes ranks and charges. Which makes me obsessive. I see. Well, I tell you what: with Jewish people having a tiny population scattered over the whole of creation, I might even be a little protective. Native Americans too, come to think of it. And even homosexuals. There we are. An admission! Now please file up for your wooden bundles and torches on the right.
And in line with redarmy11's latter comments: ok, so you want to discuss the point? Please do - but citing an antisemitic Holocaust denier might not be the way to go. I've illustrated requirements for the hypothesis almost exactly as red's - but I'm willing to bet none of you have ever read those.
Amazing. All these voices screaming to high heaven that we "learn from the past"...and yet none of them ever have, seemingly. Meanwhile, invert paints me as having anti-muslim (he carefully avoids the actual content and context, for the obvious reasons) quotes on speed-dial, much as Sam does for Israel and everything else. Absurd: first, given the actual subject of my criticism, and second given the equally absurd simplicity of locating discussions of any of it on the net, a leap he makes for Gen, but doesn't care to make for me - again, for the obvious reason. You compare me to mountainhare and DiamondHearts, you dolt.
Astounding.
Geoff
PS: BTW, "evil muslim" is just as offensive in its own right, but was employed as I recall in the context of being painted so by the "wily Jew" of reference. So: context. Learn it. Love it. If I've been remiss in condemning foul opinion and language on here, then I promise to step it up for all parties concerned. I point out, however, that much as the moderators don't have time to step in and moderate until one of their friends gets attacked, I don't have time to sort through all the posts on the forum. I'll call on the cases I see as they get pointed out to me.
and then cited this:
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1806489&postcount=38
To which I pointed out this:
*********************************************************************
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1806751&postcount=43
*********************************************************************
So "the Jew" issue has not a damn thing to do with her whining thread on juvenile outrage at being caught out, but rather about her Freudian slip and her citation of a vicious Holocaust denier, and then failure to back down a whit.
Some Fisking:
Invert has it right: you have come late to the dinner and picked up the conversation halfway through. I refer to the section above, not the idiotic "the Jew" thread that Gen contrived when she felt the room's corners bumping into her posterior. Nor have I complained at the "consciousness-raising" usage of "the Jew" which you, invert, and everyone else seems to have taken delight in engaging in. Have I, you fool, as you insist? Where? Are you even infinitesimally aware that I know and recognize the difference between actual opinion and ironic diatribe? NO, you do not so seem; and the rest of you borderline this also. Fine. You are entitled to your ignorance, and your opinions. In a curious non-sequitur, you demand I speak up for homosexual rights in Catholicism. Well, I have, as we've discussed. What I have not done, to actually parallel Gendy and make your comments legitimate, is to post my complaints that "them homersektuals has too much power in Washington, mmm-hmmm, and they weren't never discriminated agin, nope". That would be an actual parallel. Twit.
Well, she illustrated it marvellously by citing a vicious racist. I confess myself ashamed. It was me who was evil all along.
As for invert: apparently objecting to Gen's citation of a Holocaust denier is obsessive. Right. You complain that no one has ever learned anything from the issue of genocide, and yet there you go, rubbing Gen's bottom after a well-deserved spanking. You all leap on the attack, and I'm forced to defend myself as your little club closes ranks and charges. Which makes me obsessive. I see. Well, I tell you what: with Jewish people having a tiny population scattered over the whole of creation, I might even be a little protective. Native Americans too, come to think of it. And even homosexuals. There we are. An admission! Now please file up for your wooden bundles and torches on the right.
And in line with redarmy11's latter comments: ok, so you want to discuss the point? Please do - but citing an antisemitic Holocaust denier might not be the way to go. I've illustrated requirements for the hypothesis almost exactly as red's - but I'm willing to bet none of you have ever read those.
Amazing. All these voices screaming to high heaven that we "learn from the past"...and yet none of them ever have, seemingly. Meanwhile, invert paints me as having anti-muslim (he carefully avoids the actual content and context, for the obvious reasons) quotes on speed-dial, much as Sam does for Israel and everything else. Absurd: first, given the actual subject of my criticism, and second given the equally absurd simplicity of locating discussions of any of it on the net, a leap he makes for Gen, but doesn't care to make for me - again, for the obvious reason. You compare me to mountainhare and DiamondHearts, you dolt.
Astounding.
Geoff
PS: BTW, "evil muslim" is just as offensive in its own right, but was employed as I recall in the context of being painted so by the "wily Jew" of reference. So: context. Learn it. Love it. If I've been remiss in condemning foul opinion and language on here, then I promise to step it up for all parties concerned. I point out, however, that much as the moderators don't have time to step in and moderate until one of their friends gets attacked, I don't have time to sort through all the posts on the forum. I'll call on the cases I see as they get pointed out to me.
She cited a list of movies.
Don't be a shiksah (sp?).
Enough. You label everything I'm saying as childish, then engage in it yourself, or at least one hopes at this point.
You certainly will, when you come out swinging both fists in your mad ad hom style on your "buddies" and whatnot.
Patients, heal thyselves. I'm having trouble caring about your disease at this point.
Goooood day.
Geoff
And, by the way, if you want to know actual opinion? I think that the Jews have no right to Israel. The only reason they're there is because of an instilled guilt due to the Holocaust. They've made the world a far worse place due to their presence there and they continue to make it worse place every day due to their fanaticism (not all are fanatic zionists true, but enough are and the rest are generally supportive in much the same way muslims tend to support terrorism).
I'd be happy if Israel were removed from the map.
Yes, I would.
That's my opinion.
Not being ironic one little bit.