ChatGPT's Opinion on Mandatory Accounting

psikeyhackr

Live Long and Suffer
Valued Senior Member
This is really funny. Ask ChatGPT the effects of making accounting mandatory in the schools and see what you get. Our economists are not intelligent enough to think of this.

===== ChatGPT =====

Mandatory accounting education in schools could have several far-reaching effects on the economy:

1. *Financial Literacy* : Improving financial literacy among students can lead to a more financially savvy population. Individuals would be better equipped to manage personal finances, make informed investment decisions, and avoid debt, leading to greater financial stability and economic well-being.

2. *Entrepreneurship* : With a solid foundation in accounting, more students might feel empowered to start their own businesses. Understanding financial statements, budgeting, and financial planning is crucial for entrepreneurs, potentially leading to an increase in successful startups and small businesses, which are vital for economic growth and job creation.

3. *Workforce Competence* : A workforce with basic accounting knowledge can enhance productivity and efficiency in various sectors. Employees who understand financial principles can contribute more effectively to their organizations, leading to better decision-making and resource management.

4. *Economic Stability* : Financially literate individuals are more likely to save and invest wisely, contributing to a more stable and resilient economy. This can reduce the incidence of financial crises caused by poor financial decisions on both a personal and corporate level.

5. *Consumer Behavior* : Educated consumers are likely to be more cautious with their spending and borrowing. This can lead to healthier credit markets and reduced levels of personal debt, positively impacting the overall economy.

6. *Reduced Financial Fraud* : With a better understanding of accounting principles, individuals and businesses are less likely to fall victim to financial scams and fraud. This can enhance trust in financial institutions and markets.

7. *Economic Equality* : Financial education can help bridge the gap between different socioeconomic groups by providing everyone with the tools needed to manage their finances effectively. This can lead to more equitable economic growth and opportunities.

8. *Government Revenue* : Better financial literacy can lead to more accurate tax filings and compliance, potentially increasing government revenue. Additionally, a population that understands public finance might support more efficient use of public resources.

9. *Long-Term Planning* : Individuals who understand accounting are more likely to engage in long-term financial planning, including retirement savings and investments. This can reduce the burden on social safety nets and contribute to a more sustainable economic future.

10. *Cultural Shift* : Over time, mandatory accounting education can lead to a cultural shift where financial literacy is valued and prioritized. This can have a positive ripple effect on various aspects of society, including health, education, and overall quality of life.

Overall, mandatory accounting education in schools has the potential to create a more financially literate and economically stable society, with benefits that extend to individuals, businesses, and the broader economy.

=====≠==≠===≠===≠======

This should have been done since the 1950s. That is when large organizations started programming computers to do accounting.

If you search Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations you can find that he used the word 'education' Eighty Times. He wrote "read, write and account" multiple times never "read, write and arithmetic."
 
Mr. Gradgrind would be proud.
Dickens died before Marx, and of course Adam Smith died long before both of them. None of them ever saw a Planned Obsolescence Economy.

Now we have a Repo Crisis in the US but no economists have been talking about the planned obsolescence of automobiles and the total annual depreciation.

What is Net Domestic Product?
 
This is really funny. Ask ChatGPT the effects of making accounting mandatory in the schools and see what you get. Our economists are not intelligent enough to think of this.
Uh - you're not really going to take ChatGPT's output as intelligence are you?

A year ago or so a lawyer went to court with a brief that had been written by (you guessed it) ChatGPT. But someone actually checked, and it was citing cases that had never happened. He is now fighting to keep his license to practice law, and has used excuses like he was "unaware that its content could be false." Amusingly, he even asked ChatGPT if those were real cases, and ChatGPT said "yes."

Rely on ChatGPT and you'll end up like that lawyer.
 
This is really funny. Ask ChatGPT the effects of making accounting mandatory in the schools and see what you get. Our economists are not intelligent enough to think of this.

What has any of this got to do with "our economists?"
 
What has any of this got to do with "our economists?"
What is the function of economists?
Do they choose sides in the economic power game?
If accounting/finance was mandatory in the schools would that significantly affect how the economy works?
 
What is the function of economists?
Do they choose sides in the economic power game?
If accounting/finance was mandatory in the schools would that significantly affect how the economy works?
I'll repeat my question, "what does any of this have to do with 'our economists'"?
 
I'll repeat my question, "what does any of this have to do with 'our economists'"?
If that answer was not sufficient too bad.

I consider economists who ignore the depreciation of durable consumer goods and say nothing about planned obsolescence to be rather brainless.
 
If that answer was not sufficient too bad.

I consider economists who ignore the depreciation of durable consumer goods and say nothing about planned obsolescence to be rather brainless.
OK.

You might address that to accountants rather than economists and accountants have to follow FASB.
 
OK.

You might address that to accountants rather than economists and accountants have to follow FASB.
Do the Laws of Physics give a damn about FASB? What causes machines to wear out? Can the Laws of Physics tell a Capital Good from a Consumer Good.

The Net Domestic Product equation is in economics books. Some of them anyway. For some reason the economics profession only has Capital Depreciation in the equation but the purchase of consumer goods is added to GDP just like capital goods.

This separation of accounting and economics is artificial pseudointellectual BS.
 
Do the Laws of Physics give a damn about FASB? What causes machines to wear out? Can the Laws of Physics tell a Capital Good from a Consumer Good.

The Net Domestic Product equation is in economics books. Some of them anyway. For some reason the economics profession only has Capital Depreciation in the equation but the purchase of consumer goods is added to GDP just like capital goods.

This separation of accounting and economics is artificial pseudointellectual BS.
That's ridiculous. Accounting is a way to determine the financial state of a business, according to certain rules and conventions, to enable comparisons between one business and another, to verify compliance and to enable it to be properly and fairly taxed.

Economics is something else entirely.
 
Do the Laws of Physics give a damn about FASB? What causes machines to wear out? Can the Laws of Physics tell a Capital Good from a Consumer Good.

The Net Domestic Product equation is in economics books. Some of them anyway. For some reason the economics profession only has Capital Depreciation in the equation but the purchase of consumer goods is added to GDP just like capital goods.

This separation of accounting and economics is artificial pseudointellectual BS.
It's measuring production. Consumer goods are part of current production. Capital goods have to be replaced over a number of years therefore that is accounted for with an offset for yearly depreciation costs. Otherwise figures would be inflated.
 
A business is an economic unit.
A household is an economic unit.
The economy of a nation will be the sum of all of the economic units within the nation.

If you check Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations you can find that he used the word 'education' Eighty Times. He wrote "read, write and account" multiple times.

There is no reason why accounting/finance should not have been mandatory in high schools since Sputnik. Of course everyone should know about planned obsolescence, hence Depreciation.
 
It's measuring production. Consumer goods are part of current production. Capital goods have to be replaced over a number of years therefore that is accounted for with an offset for yearly depreciation costs. Otherwise figures would be inflated.
Durable consumer goods get replaced too. What do you do when your air conditioner wears out?
 
Durable consumer goods get replaced too. What do you do when your air conditioner wears out?
The cost of durable goods is accounted for in the year of purchase. Capital goods are accounted for over a few years via depreciation.
 
The cost of durable goods is accounted for in the year of purchase. Capital goods are accounted for over a few years via depreciation.
Yeah, there is no difference between a banana and an air conditioner. I buy used bananas on Craig's List all of the time.

We are supposed to think stupidly about economics because economists say so. They do not put the depreciation of durable consumer goods into the Net Domestic Product equation.

That is really curious! They hardly ever talk about the Net Domestic Product. It gets half-a-page in a 400 page book on economics, if that.
 
Yeah, there is no difference between a banana and an air conditioner. I buy used bananas on Craig's List all of the time.

We are supposed to think stupidly about economics because economists say so. They do not put the depreciation of durable consumer goods into the Net Domestic Product equation.

That is really curious! They hardly ever talk about the Net Domestic Product. It gets half-a-page in a 400 page book on economics, if that.
How did you get so fixated on this one specific issue?
 
How did you get so fixated on this one specific issue?
Oh, you need to switch from physics to psychology?

Are you saying that physics does not cause consumer technology to wear out? Karl Marx used the word Depreciation 35 times in the first two volumes of Das Kapital. However the first gas powered automobile was not invented until after his death.

So ignoring the depreciation of automobiles and other durable consumer goods is being out of touch with reality. There were 200,000,000 motor vehicles in the United States in 1995. Where did the depreciation go?

It looks like the economics profession is out of touch with reality. Maybe you need to psychoanalyze them.
 
Back
Top