Chinese Scholar Yang Jian liang Putting Wrongs to Rights in Astrophysics

Does he have that ability? Does he have that patience?
They love the mainstream, they hate the non-mainstream, and I don't expect the hires to support the new theory,they are the worshipers of dark matter anddark energy and the black hole,however, all the researches on dark matter and dark energy as well as black holes are the studies following the Wind, because these studies are not based on facts, but on the basis of authority's imagination,this kind of research is likely to go further and further along the wrong path. it is the studies following the Wind that form the mainstream which is likely to go further and further along the wrong path
 
Last edited:
why to say Hayden is a sockpuppet
Because he was in fact a sock puppet of a banned member who went by the name of 'The God'.
Hayden, The God and Rasjesh (all the same person) definitely was NOT a scholar. You think he was a scholar because he agreed with you, but he only agreed with you as a way to disagree with NotEinsein.

He had no idea one way or the other he is just a troll.
 
He had no idea one way or the other he is just a troll.
You're United in a conspiracy.I think hayden is a scholar because he is unbiased, unlike you who oppose blindly everything new. Mr James R is different from you and NotEinstein, he was misled by you
 
Last edited:
I think hayden is a scholar because he is unbiased, unlike you who oppose blindly everything new.
That's how science works: everything is false until the evidence indicates that it's true. Evidence is the bias that we need to distinguish reality from fantasy.
 
You're United in a conspiracy.
I have asked you for evidence of this claim but you have offered none, yet again make the claim, I am therefore forced to assume you are a liar.
I think hayden is a scholar because he is unbiased,
It is too bad that you do not realize how funny that statement is.
unlike you who oppose blindly everything new
I am opposed to stupid ideas, like a magically expanding earth, just silly.
 
That's how science works: everything is false until the evidence indicates that it's true. Evidence is the bias that we need to distinguish reality from fantasy.
How much proof do you need? There is plenty of evidence for the growth of the planet, but some people turn a blind ear and a blind eye to the new
 
I am opposed to stupid ideas, like a magically expanding earth, just silly.
It's not like you have magic.Yang's theory of earth growth has exact calculations, a detailed discussion。 moreover there is plenty of evidence for the growth of the planet, but some people turn a blind ear and a blind eye to the new ideas.These people are so resistant to new things that they don't listen to other people's explanations
 
I have asked you for evidence of this claim but you have offered none, yet again make the claim, I am therefore forced to assume you are a liar.

It is too bad that you do not realize how funny that statement is.

I am opposed to stupid ideas, like a magically expanding earth, just silly.
I find it most funny that Hayden called heyuhua uneducated and unable to understand or explain Yang's work, and here heyuhua is telling us how smart and correct Hayden is.:D
 
It's not like you have magic.Yang's theory of earth growth has exact calculations, a detailed discussion。 moreover there is plenty of evidence for the growth of the planet, but some people turn a blind ear and a blind eye to the new ideas.These people are so resistant to new things that they don't listen to other people's explanations
I was unable to read that, I have a bind ear.
 
I find it most funny that Hayden called heyuhua uneducated and unable to understand or explain Yang's work, and here heyuhua is telling us how smart and correct Hayden is
where does Hayden go? why don't you come here again? have you read Yang's paper?
 
Don't you love to tell evidence? Okay, you said I was wrong. Come up with your evidence.
The language barrier and your attitude makes communication impossible.
Good luck with your effort to fix GR. Bye.
 
where does Mr James R go? He claims to read Yang's article. How's he going? why don't he come?
That's a fair question. He did ask for specific article URLs back in #716 - July 21st. Are you there James? What is your considered assessment - uncovered any obvious mathematical errors of logic etc?
 
Back
Top