You may insist that Jesus didn't exist, but I believe he did simply because of the things he says....
*************
M*W: I believe Mother Goose existed because of the things she said.
You may insist that Jesus didn't exist, but I believe he did simply because of the things he says....
You may insist that Jesus didn't exist, but I believe he did simply because of the things he says....
Mother Goose doesn't say the things Jesus does...if you find other characters that say very similar things to him like say Gautama Buddha and Krishna then yeah I would believe that they existed too...*************
M*W: I believe Mother Goose existed because of the things she said.
Almost all of Jesus's teachings were radically different from all the other messiahs' teachings at the time....I mean look at Mohommad's or Mose's teachings compared to Jesus's....they're very different....But then how do you know it's Jesus who said these things?
Jesus needed to have existed before he could have said anything. You can't use your belief in his saying something as evidence for his existence, that's backwards logic.
Note that I'm not challenging Jesus' existence here, I'm challenging your logic for believing his existence.
*************
M*W: ...If it were right, there would be only one sect. If it were the right religion, everybody on earth would believe in the same religion and not question its dogma. If it were the right religion, there would be no need for a forum to discuss and debate it.
But then how do you know it's Jesus who said these things?
*************
M*W: If it were the right religion, everybody on earth would believe in the same religion and not question its dogma.
You may insist that Jesus didn't exist, but I believe he did simply because of the things he says....
M*W: Why is that? Consider: If Medicine*Woman's metaphysical speculations were correct, everybody on earth would believe Medicine*Woman's utterances and not question Medicine*Woman's dogma.