Wow I am amazed , this must be a poker forum i am currently talking in.
E=mc2 questions?
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
The mere fact that you post on a science forum doesn't mean that you're involved (or know anything about) science.
Your friend confirmed earlier that the atom makes the journey across the radius of the Neutron star, therefore a time elapse from the jouney inside the star before it is crushed . therefore existing for a short periodic moment inside the neutron star, this multiplied by other atoms making the same journey means that atoms exist inside a neutron star for a short period before they are degenerated.
You are saying the equivalent of I have a car crusher it crushes cars, but has never had a car in it for a short period of time.
Science does not know the absolute nature of gravity, other then it reveals itself when spacetime curves in the presence of matter/energy.
Likewise science cannot tell you the how or why of the BB.
Science does not profess to know everything.
Perhaps you are able to confirm these gaps in cosmology for us?
We would all be eternally grateful. [tic mode on of course]
No, I'm saying, "the likelyhood of any atom existing anywhere near a Neutron star would be near zero for many reasons" and and someone more knowledgable then me may like to confirm.
You have trouble comprehending that?
Atoms do not exist within Neutron stars, just as shadows, blackness and dark are the absence of light/photons.
Exactly , if you notice my subjects are subjects with no absolute answers, my ideas do not interfere with present knowledge and insist on looking for answers to subjects you have no ideas, such has the exact of gravity, the exact of time, the exact of the Big bang etc.
I do not claim to know everything, but what I claim is some more than obvious axioms that science already knows but for some reason has overlooked in putting it together.
The absolute nature of gravity is simply atoms in my opinion because of your what your science says about forces and attracting nature, atoms fit gravity especially when considering a dense volume of atoms.
You really should learn to read.
Anything approaching that radius starts to crush.
Anything INSIDE the radius can ONLY exist as a non-atom.
Wrong again.
The crusher output is the radius, the crusher itself is the approach to the radius - thus whatever's in the crusher is the atom getting closer to that radius, when it HITS the radius then it comes out of the crusher.
And yet you have been permanently banned elsewhere and have had all posts on this forum shifted to the fringes, including cesspool.
Like I said, quite the posturing, pretense and gibberish nonsense, and accept the fact that you are not a scientist, never have been and most certainly never will be, while you ignore present knowledge.
If its in its radius , it is not outside of it, please explain ?
That would be a lie.
You have repeatedly claimed that science is wrong.
You have repeatedly denied known facts.
You have repeatedly misstated what science actually says.
No, what you claim is nonsense. Nonsense based on an almost complete lack of knowledge and an even worse lack of reasoning ability. That, coupled with a totally indefensible belief in your own capabilities is all that keeps you going.
In other words you're now doing EXACTLY what you've just denied you do - interfere with present knowledge.
do u always have to try help your buddy out in getting people banned?
stop posting in my threads just go away i finding you now to personally upset me and i will complain to higher authorities .
What?
Go back and read my post.
It isn't a presumption: you have repeatedly and thoroughly demonstrated it.
Insofar as you have freedom of speech, you have a "right" to say any nonsense you want, but that doesn't give you any authority to make claims and avoid the inevitable laughter that results. Your nonsense has less than zero value to advancing our understanding of the universe.
"Overlooked" is the wrong word. Since it is a mixture of wrong and gibberish, there is no reason why anyone would take a serious look to begin with.
No longer I am going to answer these trolls, i will ignore them for my own sanity , they just keep on and on, insults and bans is all they mention, I apologise to other members, I can not concentrate and be serious whilst these people persist, Game over trolls your on ignore.
There's no point - you haven't ever demonstrated any sanity.
Excellent.
We get to point out the crap in your posts without further obfuscation from you.
Congratulations: you have defeated learning. Well done. Your prize is a lifetime of spectacular ignorance.
The problem with your logic is that it is unsupported. Your logic might say that the Earth is closer to the Sun in summer because it's warmer (that's just logical, right?) - but if you live in the Northern Hemisphere the science is right and you are wrong. Your logic might say that fire is the same as electricity because both can burn you, but again science would be right and you would be wrong.
So then you were lying about your PROOF that dark/blackness is real and light/photons are imaginary?
BULLSHIT. You have no axioms, you have no paper, you have no theory, and you do not even have any reasonably logical hypothesis.
Your opinion counts for naught. Stop pontificating, stop the pretense and stop the posturing.
Our best explanation of gravity is the warping of spacetime in the presence of mass.
It is only nonsense because you do not understand what i am even on about, you have no idea about the energy loss to gravity I refer to from matter.
I am not a scientist of cause it is unsupported, my ideas are new so of cause there is no support yet at this time, but there will be in the future.
Im trying to advance on ideas of our past, and science seemingly wants to stay in the past. I offer anti gravity and get laughed at, how wrong is that...
- Status