Ether model

exchemist said:
Sure, it says non profit. But it is also a pay-to-publish operation.

It also says peer reviewed………yet accepts Michael’s paper in 24hrs.

And is run out of a terraced house in a residential backstreet in Coventry.
Click to expand...

I had a thought about this kind of post on Sciforums.

Where do the scammers find customers… On a science site.

Michael maybe an innocence victim or fishing. Of course I may be wrong.
site.jpg
https://www.onlinescientificresearch.com/membership.php
 
foghorn said:
I had a thought about this kind of post on Sciforums.

Where do the scammers find customers… On a science site.

Michael maybe an innocence victim or fishing. Of course I may be wrong.
View attachment 5625
https://www.onlinescientificresearch.com/membership.php
Click to expand...
If he paid that much to... Whatever you'd call it.

I mean, I had some guy steal my telescope that I paid 10,000 cdn dollars for. (He was on camera so I got it back pretty easy.) He is over 59 but, has the maturity of a 10 year old. I don't know if I can hold a grudge against him if he has some disability.

:EDIT:

Or, is this some kind of religious thingy?
 
Last edited:
Pinball1970 said:
There are a lot of predatory sites out there. If you are willing to pay, chances of publication are not hampered by things like rigorous peer review.
Click to expand...
In Michael's defense, I did go looking for JoP&OS in the common 4 or 5 predatory publications lists. I did not find it. Doesn't mean it's not predatory, but I didn't find it.
 
DaveC426913 said:
In Michael's defense, I did go looking for JoP&OS in the common 4 or 5 predatory publications lists. I did not find it. Doesn't mean it's not predatory, but I didn't find it.
Click to expand...
I only know Beall's that was posted on another sie. Could not find it either.
 
Pinball1970 said:
I only know Beall's that was posted on another sie. Could not find it either.
Click to expand...
Yes I looked on Beall's List too. But it may too new, or too insignificant, to feature.

It costs almost nothing to set up these web-based things: they pop up like mushrooms, only limited by the finite market of cranks and charlatans desperate to be able to say they have published, somewhere. This one is barely a serious commercial operation. They can't even afford someone who can write decent English.
 
exchemist said:
Yes I looked on Beall's List too. But it may too new, or too insignificant, to feature.

It costs almost nothing to set up these web-based things: they pop up like mushrooms, only limited by the finite market of cranks and charlatans desperate to be able to say they have published, somewhere. This one is barely a serious commercial operation. They can't even afford someone who can write decent English.
Click to expand...

Yes, imagine this as the abstract.

"The authors propose a new Ether Model of the universe, Quantum Entanglement represents radiated packets of etheric energy which have the same vibratory pattern. Elemental ether units are the only actual participants in this phenomenon, with the pair of quantum units kinetically walled off like cool arms of a quiet, purring, universal ether mechanism."

The big guys are not immune to garbage though, Springer had to retract around 50 papers fairly recently. The Titles alone should have been a red flag. Someone not doing their job.
 
exchemist said:
Yes I looked on Beall's List too. But it may too new, or too insignificant, to feature.

It costs almost nothing to set up these web-based things: they pop up like mushrooms, only limited by the finite market of cranks and charlatans desperate to be able to say they have published, somewhere. This one is barely a serious commercial operation. They can't even afford someone who can write decent English.
Click to expand...
An example https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-021-08728-2

From the article.

"Then there’s “Neural network–based urban rainfall trend estimation and adolescent anxiety management,” by Mengjiao Liang, of Jiujiang University.

Another, “The characteristics of rainfall in coastal areas and the intelligent library book push system oriented to the Internet of Things,” was purportedly written by Hailing Chi, of the library at the Zibo Vocational Institute in Shandong — which we loosely summarize as: “The rain in Spain falls mainly on my new smart refrigerator.”

And, perhaps our favorite, “Distribution of earthquake activity in mountain area based on embedded system and physical fitness detection of basketball,” which sounds like it might be the poorly-written elevator pitch for a new animated movie in which The Smurfs meet a volatile Shaq.

Click here for a complete list of the papers
 
Pinball1970 said:
Yes, imagine this as the abstract.

"The authors propose a new Ether Model of the universe, Quantum Entanglement represents radiated packets of etheric energy which have the same vibratory pattern. Elemental ether units are the only actual participants in this phenomenon, with the pair of quantum units kinetically walled off like cool arms of a quiet, purring, universal ether mechanism."

The big guys are not immune to garbage though, Springer had to retract around 50 papers fairly recently. The Titles alone should have been a red flag. Someone not doing their job.
Click to expand...

A key part of my ether model of quantum entanglement you left out (possibly because I didn't include it in this citation you make from an old Post of mine) is that a (universal) ether matrix exists between the two quantum units, a matrix composed of identical elemental ether units, which enables a connection between the elemental ether units inside the two quantum units, and which also represents the original "Yin and Yang" units that initiated formation of the quantum units. This is the only sensible model out there for quantum entanglement.

I think the Journal being questioned had its heart in the right place. They wanted to see fair treatment of a rational non-mainstream viewpoint.
 
I think that the publishers green-lit a paper that has God was Creator of the Universe as one of its foundational premises is a pretty telling indicator of how legit a science publication it is.
 
Michael Anteski said:
A key part of my ether model of quantum entanglement you left out (possibly because I didn't include it in this citation you make from an old Post of mine) is that a (universal) ether matrix exists between the two quantum units, a matrix composed of identical elemental ether units, which enables a connection between the elemental ether units inside the two quantum units, and which also represents the original "Yin and Yang" units that initiated formation of the quantum units. This is the only sensible model out there for quantum entanglement.

I think the Journal being questioned had its heart in the right place. They wanted to see fair treatment of a rational non-mainstream viewpoint.
Click to expand...
You mentioned model, is there any mathematics behind this?
 
Beer w/Straw said:
I mean, I had some guy steal my telescope that I paid 10,000 cdn dollars for. (He was on camera so I got it back pretty easy.) He is over 59 but, has the maturity of a 10 year old. I don't know if I can hold a grudge against him if he has some disability.
Click to expand...
Michael has a disability? Keep him posting (footfall), kerching for Sciforums via its ads.
Poor Michael, I have sort of called him a scammer and now he's turning out to be someone with a mental disability.
 
foghorn said:
Michael has a disability? Keep him posting (footfall), kerching for Sciforums via its ads.
Poor Michael, I have sort of called him a scammer and now he's turning out to be someone with a mental disability.
Click to expand...
Beer w/ Straw did not say Michael has a disability.

It is not clear what Beer w/ Straw is talking about - or how his alleged $10, 000 stolen telescope factors in.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Beer w/ Straw did not say Michael has a disability
It is not clear what Beer w/ Straw is talking about - or how his alleged $10, 000 stolen telescope factors in.
Click to expand...

Nothing in this thread about telescopes up until now, so why a need to imply someone with a mental age of a 10 year old?
It seems Beer made a connection about someone on this thread even if you don't see it in Beer's post.
Why not ask Beer?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top