Get a grip. You're repeating a question I've already answered.
You answered it poorly.
But I take it that when you wrote "I already told you it was a compelling cellphone video of a haunting", your claim is that this cellphone video shows evidence of a paranormal event or events caused by an actual ghost, since it is traditionally ghosts that cause hauntings and you used the word "haunting".
So, if I watch the video, I'll see a ghost that you have confirmed is real and which you have confirmed can't possibly have been faked?
LOL What the hell are we talking about?
Didn't you understand? You post hundreds of videos. You post videos regularly. I typically don't watch them any more, because I find them to be a boring waste of my time.
In this case I offered to make an exception, because you have told me that you have carefully vetted this particular video and you have determined that it is not faked and that it genuinely shows something paranormal, as far as you can tell. I'm expecting big things if I ever get around to finally watching it.
But you will recall that I also asked for an undertaking from you, in exchange for the time and effort I will devote to conducting this joint analysis with you. I wrote:
You promise that you'll discuss my findings in detail and in full with me, until I am satisfied that you and I have gone as far as we can with our joint analysis, and I'll go watch it and get back to you. Will you do that?
For some reason, you didn't answer me. (Why not?)
So, will you undertake to discuss my findings about the video
in detail and in full with me, until I am satisfied we have gone as far as we can with the analysis? Or won't you?
I'll wait for your answer. If you answer in the affirmative, I will watch the video and we can begin our discussion of it. If you don't answer, or you answer in the negative, then I won't bother watching the video. I will also assume that you were too chicken to stand by your extravagant claims, which would be a fair thing to assume in that eventuality, don't you think?