You are trying to make a case for reasonable faith. Ask yourself, would you consider that your faith is misplaced when confronted with information that contradicts it? If the answer is no, then you aren't being reasonable.
Ask yourself, would you consider that your faith is misplaced when confronted with information that contradicts it?
You are trying to make a case for reasonable faith. Ask yourself, would you consider that your faith is misplaced when confronted with information that contradicts it? If the answer is no, then you aren't being reasonable.
"Would you consider that your faith is misplaced when confronted with information that contradicts it?"
is the kind of question as
"If you saw a heap of shit on the pavement, would you step into it?"
Duh.
You answered the question for me. If you were theoretically confronted with contradictory information you would ignore it like a pile of poop.
There is no contradictory evidence to the existance of God
@Knowledge --
Absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence when the evidence should be there in the first place. And since a gallon of milk displays exactly the same traits as your god, I wouldn't get so smug if I were you.
@Knowledge --
But the faithful are humans too.
No they aren't. They're simply evidence of belief in god.The faithful are evidence of God.
Of course you do. But you're wrong.I claim to know God.
Is that a threat, pal?
Who said the evidence is absent? Im here am I not?
The faithful are evidence of God.
I claim to know God.
No they aren't. They're simply evidence of belief in god.
Of course you do. But you're wrong.
That's a supposition.And belief is one of God's conditions for a good life.
Um, because you don't actually know god.How am I wrong?