Fallacy , Space can be bent , warped or contorted .

river:
river said:
It can't . To do so would mean that space can grasped a hold of . Space can not be grasped a hold of , by anything .
Click to expand...
The bending of spacetime does not require any "grasping a hold of".

Clearly, you didn't study your general relativity carefully enough. Back to the books!
river said:
You should know that people are researching anti-gravity , engineers and the like right now . And has been going on for 100yrs , at least . You should know this .
Click to expand...
How's that project coming along, river?

When will I get my antigravity car?
river said:
Your so mainstream Dave . Open your mind a bit .
Click to expand...
Claims that are empty - unsupported by evidence or argument - aren't worth anything.

You need to open your mind to evidence, river.
 
They are working on anti-gravity and the like . APEC . There are many ideas about Alternative Propulsion Systems .
 
river said:
It can't . To do so would mean that space can grasped a hold of . Space can not be grasped a hold of , by anything .
Click to expand...
The bending of spacetime does not require any "grasping a hold of".

Clearly, you didn't study your general relativity carefully enough. Back to the books!

Yes it does .
 
river said:
They are working on anti-gravity and the like . APEC . There are many ideas about Alternative Propulsion Systems .
Click to expand...
Well, no. No one is seriously working on "anti-gravity." There are several rockets under development, but they all work on the principle of reaction.
 
billvon said:
Well, no. No one is seriously working on "anti-gravity." There are several rockets under development, but they all work on the principle of reaction.
Click to expand...
go to APEC on Youtube .

Chemical Rockets will never have the capability to take a space ship to 50,000mph .
 
Last edited:
river said:
Chemical Rockets will never have the capability to take a space ship to 50,000mph .
Click to expand...
They already have.

In fact, they had done so a half century ago, when you were still a young man.

Have you considered learning about the subjects you like to talk about?
 
river said:
do you think that we can engineer right now or in the past , a space ship that can can go 50,000mph ?
Click to expand...
We can now - and did, as early as 1977.

How can you think about what's outside the box if you don't know what's in the box? I would suggest you spend less time fantasizing about futuristic space travel and more time getting up to speed on what we have accomplished right now.
 
DaveC426913 said:
We can now - and did, as early as 1977.

How can you think about what's outside the box if you don't know what's in the box? I would suggest you spend less time fantasizing about futuristic space travel and more time getting up to speed on what we have accomplished right now.
Click to expand...
What program got us to 50,000 thousand mph ?
 
Why not just tell me the program that got a space ship engineered by Humans that got Us to 50,000mph ?
Because you can't .
 
DaveC426913 said:
Apparently you can't Google.
Click to expand...
This one?

"The fastest speed by a spacecraft is 192.22 km/sec (692,000 km/h; 430,000 mph), which was achieved by the Parker Solar Probe at 11:53:48 UTC on 24 December 2024"

"Yes man I can Googie
But I need a certain clue."
;-)
 
geordief said:
This one?

"The fastest speed by a spacecraft is 192.22 km/sec (692,000 km/h; 430,000 mph), which was achieved by the Parker Solar Probe at 11:53:48 UTC on 24 December 2024"
Click to expand...
That's one, yes.

geordief said:
"Yes man I can Googie
But I need a certain clue."
;-)
Click to expand...
Googling "speed of space probes" would have gotten river a wealth of information. I think he expecte to be hand-fed the facts on the topics he likes to talk about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top