Founder, Discoverer, Scientist, Researcher and Author of the new Intelligent Design <id> and the dis

MrIntelligentDesign said:
Your mother had given you life ONCE and one time only..you did not undergo into multiple life-death-life-death-life-death processes.. Thus I am right.

Life doesn't use trial and error. When you want X to exist, you don't use trial and error since failure cannot make X.
Click to expand...
I was not suggesting reincarnation in lieu of an afterlife. I was suggesting there is NO afterlife, intelligent or otherwise. Moreover, it would break no scientific principle if any one of us were cloned and given identical lives and experiences as many times as it might amuse us. You are of a finite mind and of a very limited physical existence. There is nothing special about you that any deity would care to preserve for eternity. I would agree with such an assessment of my own limited existence as well. It's nothing personal.
 
danshawen said:
I was not suggesting reincarnation in lieu of an afterlife. I was suggesting there is NO afterlife, intelligent or otherwise. Moreover, it would break no scientific principle if any one of us were cloned and given identical lives and experiences as many times as it might amuse us. You are of a finite mind and of a very limited physical existence. There is nothing special about you that any deity would care to preserve for eternity. I would agree with such an assessment of my own limited existence as well. It's nothing personal.
Click to expand...
You are going out of topic! LOL!

You had claimed that it is possible for life to follow trial and error and I had shown you that it is impossible.

Life is one time event only..no trial and error is needed, thus, intelligence is always being used to any one time event only (X).
 
MrIntelligentDesign said:
Did you understand my OP?? Yes or NO? Which? I can clarify...
Click to expand...
Yes, I understand your OP. You made a silly pronouncement that 'real intelligence' is having multiple solutions to a problem. You then tried to prove your point by presenting a strange scenario where your boss asks for a specific item and you bring him several items, which would be a 'real stupid' thing to do. You then made the truly bizarre leap that evolution must be wrong and someone or something made life by fiat or something.

That is about the deepest understanding that can be gleaned from your confused and disjointed OP.
 
MrIntelligentDesign said:
Do they have and are you willing to use that CRITERIA in scientific debate here and crush my criteria of design from intelligence?
Click to expand...

Yes I do have proof that evolution is not from intelligence and many animals have flawed designs (left over genetics), albeit not fatal to survival.

Humans have a tail bone, which is a left over from previously tailed ancestors.
th
 
spidergoat said:
Your OP was understood as much as is possible, and thoroughly debunked. Was there something else?
Click to expand...
My goodness, if you understood it, then, you had come up with your own version of intelligence to replace with my new discoveries since you are telling me that I am wrong.

But since you did not have, then, you are telling a lie.
 
Write4U said:
Yes I do have proof that evolution is not from intelligence and many animals have flawed designs (left over genetics), albeit not fatal to survival.

Humans have a tail bone, which is a left over from previously tailed ancestors.
th
Click to expand...
TAILBONE???? Support ToE???

You knew, in this multitasking world or generations that we have, we probably need tail bone to help our hands to finish our jobs fast!

Thus, for ToE to delete tailbone for human is a disaster...since humans must use non-intelligence (stupidity) to finish the task!

Thus, intelligence is required for humans, not tailbone...thus, the Intelligent Designer had literally inactivated the genes for tailbone...thus, design is best.
 
origin said:
Yes, I understand your OP. You made a silly pronouncement that 'real intelligence' is having multiple solutions to a problem. You then tried to prove your point by presenting a strange scenario where your boss asks for a specific item and you bring him several items, which would be a 'real stupid' thing to do. You then made the truly bizarre leap that evolution must be wrong and someone or something made life by fiat or something.

That is about the deepest understanding that can be gleaned from your confused and disjointed OP.
Click to expand...
Yes, real intelligence needs a multiple solutions to a single problem..that is called intelligence.

If you solve one problem with one solution, that is normal or natural since you really need to solve that problem...thus, I am right and you are wrong.
 
MrIntelligentDesign said:
Yes, real intelligence needs a multiple solutions to a single problem..that is called intelligence.
Click to expand...
No, that is a silly definition, real intelligence is the ability to come up with the best solution. Quantity is not better than quality.

If you solve one problem with one solution, that is normal or natural since you really need to solve that problem...thus, I am right and you are wrong.
Click to expand...
Saying I am wrong is only using one solution, so you must not be intelligent according to your definition.:)
 
MrIntelligentDesign said:
TAILBONE???? Support ToE???
You knew, in this multitasking world or generations that we have, we probably need tail bone to help our hands to finish our jobs fast!
Thus, for ToE to delete tailbone for human is a disaster...since humans must use non-intelligence (stupidity) to finish the task!
Thus, intelligence is required for humans, not tailbone...thus, the Intelligent Designer had literally inactivated the genes for tailbone...thus, design is best.
Click to expand...
You keep coming up with just one solution to the problem of the diversity of life (ID), ironic, no?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top