Future Major Science Breakthrough- Levitation using anti-gravity matter.

[Scott]

Ah yes, now we get to the classic crackpot conspiracy stuff.

The reason a given crackpot and their woo-woo theories are completely unrecognised and dismissed as drivel is not because the said crackpot is a complete nutter.

Oh no.

It’s because there is some sort of coordinated world-wide scientific orthodoxy that actively seeks to protect their power and prestige by putting down these brilliant geniuses on internet science forums.

Naturally.

Have you been hiding under a rock? The NWO is no longer a secret, whats the point of ruling a world of free people?

 

[Ophiolite]

Scott,
at one time I thought you were a young, naive, over enthusiastic, brash individual who just needed some guidance to help you grow up. I apologise for that inaccurate, optimistic, misguided view. As others have observed you are ****ing crazy.
Best wishes with your future failures,
Ophiolite

 

[Scott]

Scott,
at one time I thought you were a young, naive, over enthusiastic, brash individual who just needed some guidance to help you grow up. I apologise for that inaccurate, optimistic, misguided view. As others have observed you are ****ing crazy.
Best wishes with your future failures,
Ophiolite

At least you can admit when you make a mistake, you are making great strides. I wish you all the best.

 

[Scott]

You can look up ion lifters, they do work in a vacuum contrary to what the government wants you to believe.

No they don't.


No it doesn't.

Through my comprehensive understanding I have since come to the conclusion that our very atmosphere is made up of these anti gravity particles I have been trying to teach you guys for years.

Lucky for us our atmosphere is not dictated by gravity or we would all have to hoover of the ground, and more obvious the suns rays would have killed us a long time ago.

Lets all praise this repulsing field we are not taught about that keeps us alive.

All hail anti gravity, this repulsing field that keeps the moon in its orbit.

And we will just forget that it comes through ionisation (electron removal) so the week minded do not have to be CRUSHED with this new reality.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Through my comprehensive understanding I have since come to the conclusion that our very atmosphere is made up of these anti gravity particles I have been trying to teach you guys for years.

Uh huh.
Your "understanding" is flawed.

Lucky for us our atmosphere is not dictated by gravity or we would all have to hoover of the ground, and more obvious the suns rays would have killed us a long time ago.

Sheer nonsense.

Lets all praise this repulsing field we are not taught about that keeps us alive.
All hail anti gravity, this repulsing field that keeps the moon in its orbit.

Also nonsense.

And we will just forget that it comes through ionisation (electron removal) so the week minded do not have to be CRUSHED with this new reality.

You really don't get out much do you?

 

[AlphaNumeric]

It really is not that complicated, Nobel prises are allowed not earned, per review panels are set up to allow what is want passed, not earned. The people that wright your text books allow what they want in there NOT the truth. You guys fail to do the research and connect the dots, your reality is dictated to you.

I know the guys who write the textbooks, I work with them. I am doing research. There's no global conspiracy, no suppression of truth, simply the requirement people actually back up their claims.

You claim you have free energy. That is worth trillions. Even if you give it away free it would save the Human Race trillions of dollars/pounds/euros a year and probably save us from global warming and would save a great deal of lives when wars for resources are no longer required. And yet you can't produce any evidence to back up your claims.

You want to believe there's a conspiracy of silence in science because it gives you justification for your abject failure in life. It gives you an excuse, it helps you avoid the truth, that the problem isn't with 'everyone else', it is with you.

Through my comprehensive understanding I have since come to the conclusion that our very atmosphere is made up of these anti gravity particles I have been trying to teach you guys for years.

Lucky for us our atmosphere is not dictated by gravity or we would all have to hoover of the ground, and more obvious the suns rays would have killed us a long time ago.

Lets all praise this repulsing field we are not taught about that keeps us alive.

All hail anti gravity, this repulsing field that keeps the moon in its orbit.

And we will just forget that it comes through ionisation (electron removal) so the week minded do not have to be CRUSHED with this new reality.

Tell me, do you have a job? It's just that you are obviously so paranoid and delusional that I don't see how someone like you could hold down a regular job, which requires you get there at a certain time or complete some kind of task or interact with customers. You sound like you'd accuse every customer of being a NWO secret agent there to kill you for your free energy secret.

It's weird that most NWO believers are Americans. They love their country so much, they want to be the greatest country on Earth but if anyone tries to construct an organisation of more than a few of its citizens (ie an organising power like the government) suddenly its a bad thing. They love an ideal but not the realisation. Here in Britian we're still patriotic but we seem to be a little bit more reserved about it. American sensationalism is always a little over the top in our eyes and that seems to hold true in the realm of crazy conspiracy theories. And religious cults. I guess we don't have thousands of square miles of desert for the nuts to go live in.....

 

[Scott]

Uh huh.
Your "understanding" is flawed.


Sheer nonsense.


Also nonsense.


You really don't get out much do you?

I guess you failed to look up our atmosphere and ionosphere. come back and talk to me when you are more educated. Will ya?

 

[Scott]

It's weird that most NWO believers are Americans. They ....

Hmm all major G7 and 8 countries are calling for a new world order and you have not figured out they where not bought and paid for? well the tells me why the rest of your conversation was garbage.

 

[Ophiolite]

See a doctor.

 

[Dywyddyr]

I guess you failed to look up our atmosphere and ionosphere.

Ah, wrong.

come back and talk to me when you are more educated. Will ya?

Pot/ kettle.
At least I have some education, as opposed to specious wild unsupported guesses.

 

[AlphaNumeric]

I guess you failed to look up our atmosphere and ionosphere. come back and talk to me when you are more educated. Will ya?

I do research in particle physics and your claims about antigravity in the atmosphere are nonsense. Come back and talk to me when you're not a deranged thick nutter.

well the tells me why the rest of your conversation was garbage.

So you can't explain why you have not got a single jot of evidence for your huge claims and you're just deflecting. Thought so.

How can you know about the scientific community when you obviously avoid anything remotely scientific? You clearly don't know any scientists in any decent way and you obviously don't know the scientific method. But then why should complete ignorance stop you making huge claims you can't back up? :shrug:

 

[Scott]

I do research in particle physics and your claims about antigravity in the atmosphere are nonsense. Come back and talk to me when you're not a deranged thick nutter.

So you can't explain why you have not got a single jot of evidence for your huge claims and you're just deflecting. Thought so.

How can you know about the scientific community when you obviously avoid anything remotely scientific? You clearly don't know any scientists in any decent way and you obviously don't know the scientific method. But then why should complete ignorance stop you making huge claims you can't back up? :shrug:

lol you know what the funny thing is, i don't have to prove it, it's BLATENLY OBVOUSE. the fact our atmosphere is not on the ground proves it defies gravity. YOU KNOW JACK ABOUT PARTAL PHYSICS.

I bet you have not even read this article.

NASA Jumps at Patent for Plasma-Powered UFO Technology



http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/science_news/4269027.html

lmao the funny thing is you guys don't even realise you would not even be here without this fundamental force that is not talked about in science.

It maintains orbits, it gives us an atmosphere, it gives us rain.

When water ionises it can hang in out atmosphere, electrons are directly related to gravity, this is how a heavy molecule can hang in our atmosphere.

And spare me the helium in a vacuum test, i have seen it and the balloon still stands up, not only that it is pressurized.

And yes ion lifters DO work in a vacuum.


lol the stupidity around here is ramped. See you guys in another year or so when science catches up more.

 

[AlphaNumeric]

lol you know what the funny thing is, i don't have to prove it, it's BLATENLY OBVOUSE. the fact our atmosphere is not on the ground proves it defies gravity.

Our atmosphere doesn't defy gravity. If it did, why is it not floating off into space, why does it cling to the Earth's surface? Tree leaves aren't on the ground. Do they defy gravity?

lYOU KNOW JACK ABOUT PARTAL PHYSICS.

Firstly, if you're going to get angry at least make sure you spell words like 'obviously' and 'particle' (the ones you capitalise) properly. Secondly, I have 3 papers to my name in the realm of theoretical physics, I have 3 years of a PhD in a theoretical physics department under my belt and I have taught quantum mechanics to undergraduates. I'd say I know a bit more than 'jack' (or even Scott) about 'partal' [sic] physics.

I bet you have not even read this article.

No, I haven't. It might shock you to realise/learn but particle physics isn't learnt by reading articles on pop science websites. I have, however, read such books as 'An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory' by Peskin and Schroder. Or 'String Theory' by Polchinski. Actual textbooks. I have also sat lecture courses and passed exams on them. I have work published in The Journal of High Energy Physics.

You clearly have a very very skewed view of how science works and how it is done. You think there's some huge conspiracy but there isn't. You are a failure and you're looking for someone to blame.

lmao the funny thing is you guys don't even realise you would not even be here without this fundamental force that is not talked about in science.

Ion propulsion is simple electromagnetism. Nothing unknown or not talked about, electromagnetism is the simplest and best understood of forces of Nature. Rather than reading web pages, why not try reading books. It's all in there, you only claim it isn't so you can give yourself an excuse about why you don't read or learn things. You're too stupid and you're trying to blame other people.

Gravity, electromagnetism, ions, atmospheric dynamics, thermodynamics, magnetohydrodynamics. These are things learnt by students, they aren't 'secret' or 'not talks about in science'. Rather than shunning books, open some.

 

[Scott]

Tree leaves are held up by a branch, not much comparison there, Hydrogen has been found leaving our atmosphere in abundance.

Elements do not have to float into space to be defying gravity. They simply just have to be off the ground don't they.

wow 3 papers and you have still not figured out our explanation of orbits is incorrect? When you figure out the correct explanation that will teach you how our atmosphere is maintained and how ion lifters truly work.

Have a look at strepulsion.

 

[Stryder]

Scott,
An "Atmosphere" is created via "Pressure", the combined molecular mass generates it's own self supporting structure in regards to an environment that subjects it to gravity. When you walk around you are breathing air, that air fills a volume that would otherwise be vacuumous. The only reason that air is there is because it's pulled into that vacuum via gravity and the trillions of litre's of gases that exist all around it pressurizing it into position.

To my knowledge the only attempted anti-gravity systems have attempted to utilise this molecular support structure (Atmospheric pressure). This means the higher an object/craft attempts to go, the more molecular structure the weight of the object/craft has to be dispersed across, this means a rise in the overall energy needed to create the dissipation. Dissipation can be Magnetic, Electromagnetic and even other frequencies however they have to entangle with molecules which is where energy is required.

(You just have to look at Japan's "Bullet Train" to see dissipation of mass through magnet's which use the molecules between surfaces to suppose the weight of the train)

In essence it becomes infeasible to build flying craft or spaceships when you are dealing with the upper atmosphere as the atmospheric pressure because low and the atmosphere thin.

A very basic way to try and interpret feasibility is to look at Archimedes Principle in Hydrostatics or how boats displace weight on water, or how flying craft displace their weight over the surface of their wingspan based upon their speed of travel. (Incidentally while the atmosphere might well be made of gases, it's still subjected to physical rules applied to liquids)

If you can't get those basic notions into consideration, then you will likely continue to ring the bells of a:

 

[Scott]

Pressure maintains the atmosphere. The particles are not held up via pressure though.

There is an anti gravity feature in atoms, it is from the wave function of the nucleus, it is also what holds electrons away from the nucleus.

You can achieve anti gravity via electron removal, or electron disruption.

In the ion lifters case the electrical current makes the electrons in the atoms of the structure follow the path of the current and not complete there rotation inside the atoms.

With the wingless electromagnetic aerial vehicle they will discover time dilation's that will prove they are disrupting gravity.

I might come back when science admits this and the correct explanations of orbits. Until then I am tired of you guys treating since as a religion instead of it being what it is supposed to be, the updating of new and current information.

This requires for wannabee scientist to do the work before commenting on something they have no clue what they are talking about but think they do because they have a good memory of textbooks they read NOTHING more.

Science has become an absolute joke compared to what it is supposed to be.

Perhaps when you are told of the reality of extraterrestrial visitation we can talk more.

And for those that don't believe when you are told and have your reality dictated to you, consider what else you might have been wrong about due to treating science as a religion.

 

[Dywyddyr]

There is an anti gravity feature in atoms, it is from the wave function of the nucleus, it is also what holds electrons away from the nucleus.

No there isn't and no it isn't.

You can achieve anti gravity via electron removal, or electron disruption.

No you can't.

With the wingless electromagnetic aerial vehicle they will discover time dilation's that will prove they are disrupting gravity.

No they won't.

I might come back when science admits this and the correct explanations of orbits. Until then I am tired of you guys treating since as a religion instead of it being what it is supposed to be, the updating of new and current information.

Go away and stay away.
You've posted nothing of value and have consistently failed to support your claims.

Science has become an absolute joke compared to what it is supposed to be.

Bearing in mind your knowledge of actual science appears to be close to zero, how would you know?

Perhaps when you are told of the reality of extraterrestrial visitation we can talk more.

More specious bullshit. Unless by "reality of extraterrestrial visitation" you mean "it hasn't happened".

 

[(Q)]

I might come back when science admits this...

Then, it looks like we won't be seeing you again. Bye.

Perhaps when you are told of the reality of extraterrestrial visitation we can talk more.

Again, it would appear we won't be talking. Bye.

 

[albertchong1999]

i already told you all that alien must be existed in the universe for millions of years but no one believe me, now the brightest brain Steven Hawking do agree that aliens do exist in the universe. So what do you want to say? I told you that you need to study and think a lot to understand everything in the universe, not just learning the updated knowledge but you need to think in other viable and creative way like what Enistein had done. Some science do not have physical evidence like God, ghost, spirit, paranormal activity etc, but they do exist, you all will understand one day....

 

[albertchong1999]

if you think that the vast universe of 13.6 billions light-years space only occupied by living creatures on planet earth, then you prove yourself to be selfish and arrogant.the noble is "If you can make it, there is no reason why other can't make it as well."