Galactic Dark Matter

[James R]

I see why physicists prefer to work alone now.

As I understand it, physics in the modern era is very much a collaborating endeavour. Nobody is likely to get very far working in isolation.

Are you a physicist?

I cannot seriously begin to even fathom how you are so completely dumbstruck by all of this.

Hardly dumbstruck.

On the contrary, I have asked you probably 50 questions by now. You've attempted to answer just one or two of them, and you have ignored the rest.

Maybe you're the one who is dumbstruck. Something to think about.

How do I even begin to take you seriously?

I thought you wanted to discuss these things. If you don't, that's fine. I'll leave you to it if you'd prefer.

All I see is every sentence followed by a dumb question.

One would think they'd be easy to answer, then.

Why won't you answer them?

 

[James R]

Since this has been promoted to pseudoscience instead of free thoughts, I would pseudo that dark matter will eventually take over as the dominant force in the universe.

Dark matter isn't a force.

The Andromeda Galaxy is the closest neighbor and will collide with the Milky Way.

It's already expected it will do that in 4 billion years or so.

The amount of dark energy will eventually diminish from matter and energy being spewed into the galaxies. The orbits of the supermassive black holes will increase over time, shrinking the event horizon allowing cosmic jet streams to create more spiral arms. We will not be converted into Boltzmann Brains after this collision, because we already would have if that was to be the case. It will then create a new super galaxy which will then continue to jump through time, creating a new universe that has more massive galaxies in it. When scientists observe the increased acceleration of the universe, they are actually only measuring what it use to be previously when the acceleration first started.

Can you give any reasons why anybody else should believe any of this?

 

[Contemplation]

Dark matter isn't a force.

It's already expected it will do that in 4 billion years or so.

Can you give any reasons why anybody else should believe any of this?

Dark matter isn’t a force? It seems you have finally pointed out a real reason why you don’t agree with what I said. I find it surprising that you have chosen this one. I thought how this was supposed to work. If people agree or don’t have a solid reason to disagree with it, then they don’t mention anything about a concept they don’t like.

It seems like you are still overreacting to this. The reason behind what I say is because I believe that dark matter is from the proper time not being Lorentz Invariant. If you want to actually discuss that then we should start there. I believe that is the main issue clouding your judgement about this, or whatever you seen me post about in another thread.

The Lorentz Factor is the inverse in the proper time. The maths do not work out.

 

[Contemplation]

In the video I posted, it talks about the history of competing models physicist used to describe the large scale structure of the universe. There was the pancake model, meatball model, and the sponge model. Did these physicist actually believe that the universe was actually made of pancakes, meatballs, and sponges? No, absolutely not.

The reason behind this was that the situation was just too complex, and they actually didn’t know the real reason behind the large scale structure problem. The models are just guidelines that they follow to give a close approximation of it. Dark matter is actually just a description that makes one of these approximations more accurately fit the data.

 

[James R]

Contemplation:

Dark matter isn’t a force?

The hint is right there in the name: dark matter. Not dark force. Matter is not a force.

It seems like you are still overreacting to this. The reason behind what I say is because I believe that dark matter is from the proper time not being Lorentz Invariant.

Either you're using the term "proper time" in an idiosyncratic way, or you don't understand what it is. But I have asked you what you mean by it, and that's just one of the hundred questions I put to you that you have failed to answer.

The Lorentz Factor is the inverse in the proper time.

What does that even mean? What do you mean by "inverse"? Do you mean "reciprocal"? If that's what you mean, then you're wrong, because the Lorentz factor is dimensionless. It does not have dimensions of reciprocal time.

Are you going to address the questions I asked you previously, or not?

 

[Contemplation]

The hint is right there in the name: dark matter. Not dark force. Matter is not a force.

How can you be so sure?

What does that even mean? What do you mean by "inverse"? Do you mean "reciprocal"? If that's what you mean, then you're wrong, because the Lorentz factor is dimensionless. It does not have dimensions of reciprocal time.

What are you even talking about?

Are you going to address the questions I asked you previously, or not?

How do you want me to explain this?

 

[James R]

How can you be so sure?

Because I have spent quite some time learning stuff about physics.

What are you even talking about?

Your claim that "The Lorentz Factor is the inverse in the proper time."

Wasn't that clear?

How do you want me to explain this?

A simple "yes" or "no" is all that is required.

 

[Contemplation]

Because I have spent quite some time learning stuff about physics.

Your claim that "The Lorentz Factor is the inverse in the proper time."

Wasn't that clear?

A simple "yes" or "no" is all that is required.

Ah, I get it now. We actually live in a giant version of SpongeBob SquarePants that lives in a bubble under the sea, so this proves that the missing dark matter is actually matter that we cannot see. I should have went over what is actually the current science first, instead of jumping to random conclusions.

 

[James R]

This thread is going nowhere. It is now closed.