God in all things

E

epicurus_splendicus

Banned
Banned
"I" existeth not in nor out but throughout
I am the love that is one in things throughout
I am good and evil none
Look inside me and you will not find me
Look within me and you will not find me
Nor will I be foundeth in you.
I am He who knows only truth
I am the wiseness inbound in all things
I am the love who knowest not in concepts nor words
but in one thing, which become self-stratified to all things.
As words are only concept they have grammar
Reality is isomorphic to a description but what description it takes is
determined by one reality, however syntax creates meaning of that information
discovered to be the fabric of reality, where cognition processes information to
become infocognition

Reality is like America, a freedom to configure itself without constraint.
Anything else by any other name would still be the same, and the freedom and constraint we experience in spirit and in material is found to be a 2-stage process. This 2-stage process is merged into one and that one then configures itself through unbound telesis (a state-recognition syntax).

smile.png
smile.png
smile.png
 
epicurus_splendicus said:
"I" existeth not in nor out but throughout
I am the love that is one in things throughout
I am good and evil none
Look inside me and you will not find me
Look within me and you will not find me
Nor will I be foundeth in you.
I am He who knows only truth
I am the wiseness inbound in all things
I am the love who knowest not in concepts nor words
but in one thing, which become self-stratified to all things.
As words are only concept they have grammar
Reality is isomorphic to a description but what description it takes is
determined by one reality, however syntax creates meaning of that information
discovered to be the fabric of reality, where cognition processes information to
become infocognition

Reality is like America, a freedom to configure itself without constraint.
Anything else by any other name would still be the same, and the freedom and constraint we experience in spirit and in material is found to be a 2-stage process. This 2-stage process is merged into one and that one then configures itself through unbound telesis (a state-recognition syntax).

smile.png
smile.png
smile.png
Click to expand...

And smileys from the village miraculously working over here, no less.

Joy Beth: "You know it's a sign from beyond, Pa. We've go to back and dig Calico out of that rock slide. She's still alive!"

- - -
 
epicurus_splendicus said:
"I" existeth not in nor out but throughout
I am the love that is one in things throughout
I am good and evil none
Look inside me and you will not find me
Look within me and you will not find me
Nor will I be foundeth in you.
I am He who knows only truth
I am the wiseness inbound in all things
I am the love who knowest not in concepts nor words
but in one thing, which become self-stratified to all things.
As words are only concept they have grammar
Reality is isomorphic to a description but what description it takes is
determined by one reality, however syntax creates meaning of that information
discovered to be the fabric of reality, where cognition processes information to
become infocognition

Reality is like America, a freedom to configure itself without constraint.
Anything else by any other name would still be the same, and the freedom and constraint we experience in spirit and in material is found to be a 2-stage process. This 2-stage process is merged into one and that one then configures itself through unbound telesis (a state-recognition syntax).

smile.png
smile.png
smile.png
Click to expand...
“I existeth” is bad grammar. -eth is used for the 3rd person, not the 1st.

But you are clearly mad as a March hare - and strangely reminiscent of Spellbound.

Correction: you ARE Spellbound:https://www.religiousforums.com/threads/let-supreme-logic-lead-you-to-god.261495/#post-7811940
 
Last edited:
I always find this part of sock puppetry such a strange ritual.
Yes! I am Spellbound, you should be rewarded with a prize for your correct guess. How about supreme intelligence? Oh wait, only I get that whenever I'm ^. Hence my dual identity like Batman/ Bruce Wayne. The lesser serves the greater identity. But maybe you will be rewarded for something else. How about Heaven in the after life the day you meet your fate? I regret to inform you that I will not be joining you and the rest of humanity, as I will be building an artificial intelligence and transferring my consciousness into it. Thus fulfilling the prophecy of the Great genius. As for my future on sciforums as a way of beginning anew. Life happens, you live, you learn. Perhaps Mrs Mitchell said it best in her song, "You don't know what you got till it's gone."

 
epicurus_splendicus said:
"I" existeth not in nor out but throughout
I am the love that is one in things throughout
I am good and evil none
Look inside me and you will not find me
Look within me and you will ... blah blah blah

God in all things
Click to expand...

Now, while your post is thoughtless word salad, the title makes an interesting claim.

It implies knowledge of something, specifically that some element, characteristic, trait... whatever has been identified to be common in "all things" and you've decided to call it God. Pray tell, what exactly is that commonality and how do you know?
 
(Q) said:
Now, while your post is thoughtless word salad, the title makes an interesting claim.

It implies knowledge of something, specifically that some element, characteristic, trait... whatever has been identified to be common in "all things" and you've decided to call it God. Pray tell, what exactly is that commonality and how do you know?
Click to expand...

It is that which is undivided and underlines all matter. Much like becoming a supreme awareness.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top