Originally posted by Xev
Your opinion is verbal shit. Nobody with an IQ above that of a cauliflower would respect it.
** But they'll listen to it (he-he)
None of us would want to sleep with you, Lady dear. But you will have to succumb to us in the political sphere.
** Succumb what does that mean?
Originally posted by Asguard
hey lady
you know what the gate way to gay sex, animal sex, whips and chains, bj, ect is??????
SEX
OMG
we have to ban all sex now
Originally posted by RichardJA
ok Jan, I'll bite, explain why it would be detriment to the persons and society involved. Is it wrong that a person is happy being who they are, the way they were created? Is it wrong for the person to be in a loving, caring supportive relationship. Or would you prefer they are in a heterosexual relationship where they are lying to the person they are involved with, and lying to themselves, they are miserable, and hate their life. You will no doubt tell me homosexuality is wrong. Would you like to tell that to the two bulls I have out that back that were mounting each other last night.
You're missing the point.
You're asking questions, why this and why that, you feel it, you know what you are going through, i am merely trying to communicate to you some possible answers. Don't waste your time trying to prove me right or wrong, now you have more answers to your questions, try and work things out for yourself.
The problem with homosexuality isn't religion or God. No, the problem is the religious fanatics that think it is their right to interfere with people's privates life's just because they believe that the hurt and hatred that they preach is doing god's work.
Do you think if men loved and cared for other men, the same way men and women cared for each other but never had sex with each other, it would matter so much?
I know what you are thinking, it's my life, i can live it how i please, etc etc...But we both know life doesn't work like that, there is always going to be interferance and discomfort.
Don't get me wrong, i am not in judgement of you, my stance in this conversation, so far is one of neutrality, but I think the problem with homosexuality is the "sex act".
Love
Jan Ardena.
** But they'll listen to it (he-he)
** Succumb what does that mean?
atleast a goat wouldnt keep bleating "god said so" at people who either dont belive in him\her or have a totaly DIFFERENT view of him\her
:bugeye:Originally posted by Xev
Lady:
Listen, but we'll also laugh at you. Fool.
** SO ? whats your point?
It means you need to buy a dictionary
** Will you buy me one? So that I may understand your great wisdom
you stupid fundie bitch. God, you are such a moron that you would lose an IQ race with a tomato.
Hmm, I'm out of practice with the flames.
** wha.... fundie...Your flames stink ..( I will look that word up) you might have crossed the line....
Originally posted by Xev
Lady:
You have the common sense of Raisin Bran and the intelligence to match. You should go back to alt.stupidfundietwits, for you don't belong in the company of anyone who can comprehend simple things like the fact that ice is cold.
** Are you spitting great wisdom again?
You are merely a stupid troll with no life or future outside the 'net. However, take comfort in the fact that you have a great future on the internet, as a laughingstock for your intellectual superiours.
** Enough with the compliments
Now, don't take me as bragging when I say I'm your intellectual superiour. After all, the class of "Lady's superiours" includes:
Flatworms
Retarded jellyfish
Lobotomized kittens
Spirocytes
** You have no future in comedy
Originally posted by Banshee
Lady, in fact, I do not even read your "posts" in here. I agree with Xev. They are too stupid to be true.
** Obviously you do read my post- YOU KEEP CLOSING THEM
HAD NO RIGHT TO CLOSE THE PARANORMAL THREAD
I suggest you start to show something of intelligence. Stop your quotes and one sentence "replies" on that quotes and give us a good reason why we should read the ramblings you display here at sciforums, in many, many threads.
** And how would you know my intelligence level if you don't read my post?
So, Lady, back on topic. If you do not have anything significant to say, then don't say anything.
** That's the whole ideal......Lady don't say anything.
If you do have a problem with members, you can start a thread in Free Thoughts.
**WILL YOU CLOSE THAT ONE TO?
That is a very impetuous thing to assert, comrade! Even the dull and ignorant have their stories, and, ergo, it is unwise and crass to ignore them.Originally posted by Xev
Your opinion is verbal shit. Nobody with an IQ above that of a cauliflower would respect it.
The "big deal" of this issue is the fact that regardless of one's denial of it, homosexuality is as deleterious as cannibalism. The effects of these disparate yet alike tendencies are identical:
They both nullify the effect of procreation, the act which "invigorates" and immortalizes the human race by allowing transient persons to leave behind a remnant of themselves in their progeny and future descendents
It is my well-founded belief that homosexuality, along with all other forms of sexual perversion, finds its cause in psychologically influential minutiae in the lives of the "affected
Originally posted by Redoubtable
Subsequently, the reader may understand that if I myself were to belittle or accost homosexuals in any way, I would be making a mockery of my own nature, one of perversion.
That is a very impetuous thing to assert, comrade! Even the dull and ignorant have their stories, and, ergo, it is unwise and crass to ignore them.
The "big deal" of this issue is the fact that regardless of one's denial of it, homosexuality is as deleterious as cannibalism.
They both nullify the effect of procreation, the act which "invigorates" and immortalizes the human race by allowing transient persons to leave behind a remnant of themselves in their progeny and future descendents.
Typical humans, though perhaps not realizing it consciously, are "subconsciously cognizant" and rather wary of homosexuality's inherently pernicious nature.
This is why they abominate it so and decry it as 'evil." This is not to indicate that homosexuality is an antethesis to morality, but simply a harmful anomoly that many people detest without fathomig their true reasons for doing so.
It is my well-founded belief that homosexuality, along with all other forms of sexual perversion, finds its cause in psychologically influential minutiae in the lives of the "affected."
Thus, it is by these "adjustments" that any given person may progress from normal heterosexuality into less-normal homosexuality
into bizarre variations on the sexual-drive like sadism, masochism, or pedophilia.
Ok, and now the big question: When it comes to the issue of homosexuality, why is it that the people who are against it always seem like they are the ones with something stuck up their ass?
Originally posted by Xev
Redoubtable:
It's called baiting. *Winks*
What's wrong with cannibalism? While murdering someone for their sweetbreads (and serving them to the Boston Philharmonic) is going a bit overboard, why is chowing down on the dead any worse than letting 'em rot?
Piffle. Homosexuality does not nullify the effect of procreation. Homosexual sex is simply non-procreative.
You have in no way proved homosexuality to be "inherently pernicious". You've backed an assertion with an assertion, and ended up with an assertion.
Does objective morality exist?
So much for any implication that homosexuality is "immoral".
Can you show homosexuality to be "abnormal"?
Don't try to tell me it's against nature. Homosexual sex is common in dolphins and chimpanzees, to name a few animals.
Some of us would seperate consensual, non-harmful things such as homosexuality or sadomasochism with nonconsensual, harmful things like paedophilia . . .