Is this the best discussion forum that you have ever found?

Is it just my imagination or is Sciforums the best discussion forum available?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • No

    Votes: 2 50.0%
  • Not sure..... I've really never bothered with any other forum for long????

    Votes: 1 25.0%

  • Total voters
    4
What is "fundamental or nearly fundamental energy"? There is no "pure energy" apart from something else.

Perhaps I have gotten the wrong impression but very basic String Theory seems to imply that as the four forces of electromagnetism, gravity, weak and strong nuclear come closer and closer to full unity....... (my impressions would be that if we assume M-Theory this would be in the original energy of the ninth, tenth and eleventh dimensional space time continuums), that energy is operating at higher and higher levels of energy and is likely the energy of three dimensions that would be compiled from Super Waves and Super Strings much earlier than the Big Bang which was supposedly only around fourteen billion or so years ago.

My impression is that Intelligence would occur in whatever ninth, tenth and eleventh dimensional space time long before the Big Bang event as it is postulated.
 
Last edited:
You do understand energy is not stuff right?

You cannot compose (make something) of energy

Me thinks you are in the realm of

An intangible, modifiable force (often characterized as either 'positive' or 'negative') believed in some New Age religions to emanate from a person, place or thing and which is (or can be) preserved and transferred in human interactions; shared mood or group habit; a vibe, a feeling, an impression. (Compare aura.)

My highlight - Definition Number 4 from English app dictionary

:)


Actually... .I think that you are incorrect......
and just as electromagnetism, gravity, weak and strong nuclear force could be considered to be "stuff"... If you do a search in Sciforums for the name Chaim Henry Tejman M. D. you will see quotations by me on Wave Theory by Dr. Tejman that to my thinking imply exactly that higher and more fundamental energy behaves somewhat like "stuff" ..... .but.....
we are scared of the implications of this because one of the very simple implications is that evolution did NOT BEGIN in a four dimensional space time continuum.
 
Perhaps I have gotten the wrong impression but very basic String Theory seems to imply that as the four forces of electromagnetism, gravity, weak and strong nuclear come closer and closer to full unity....... (my impressions would be that if we assume M-Theory this would be in the original energy of the ninth, tenth and eleventh dimensional space time continuums), that energy is operating at higher and higher levels of energy and is likely the energy of three dimensions that would be compiled from Super Waves and Super Strings much earlier than the Big Bang which was supposedly only around fourteen billion or so years ago.

My impression is that Intelligence would occur in whatever ninth, tenth and eleventh dimensional space time long before the Big Bang event as it is postulated.
String Theory is just sci-fi, you do know that, right?
 
Yea, if it seems “spammy,” then it’s best to not post it.

Many of the topics that I care about depend on a rather similar intellectual foundation that I have to quote from others......
here is something that I consider to have huge implications so you will run into this being quoted in several of my discussions.

"It was not until 1920 that the idea of linking electromagnetism and
gravity resurfaced. At that time a new theory of gravitation had been proposed by Albert Einstein (1879-1955), called the general theory of relativity. It was a replacement of Newton's theory, which had stood unchallenged since 1687. Inspired by Einstein's work, a young German mathematician named Theodore Kaluza was seized by a curious idea. The theory of relativity links space an time together to form a four-dimensional space-time continuum. What would happen, mused Kaluza, if general relativity were formulated in five rather than four dimensions? This is what Kaluza did, and to everyone's astonishment it was discovered that five-dimensional gravity obeys the same laws as
four-dimensional gravity as well as Maxwell's laws for the electromagnetic field. In other words, gravitation and electromagnetism are automatically unified in five dimensions, where electromagnetism is merely a component of gravity!"


The only drawback of the theory concerns the extra dimension. Why
don't we see it?
An ingenious answer was provided by Oskar Klein. A
hosepipe viewed from afar looks like a wiggly line, i.e. one- dimensional.
However, on closer inspection it can be seen as a narrow tube. It is, in fact,
two-dimensional, and what was taken to be a point on the line is actually a
little circle going around the tube. In the same way, reasoned Klein, what we normally regard as a point in three dimensional space could in reality be a little circle going around a fourth space dimension. Thus Kaluza's extra
dimension might well exist, but be impossible to detect because it is closed
(circular) and rolled up to a very small circumference. In spite of
these bizarre overtones, it seems probable that in future a "theory of everything" will make use of the idea of unseen higher dimensions."
.
...

"Although nature manifests four distinct forces, physicists believe that
each may be part of a smaller number of more primitive forces. At high energy, the electromagnetic and weak forces appear to merge into a single "electroweak" force. Some "grand unified theories" suggest that a further amalgamation takes place between the electroweak and strong forces at as yet unattained energies. The most ambitious unification schemes envisage an amalgamation of all four forces into a single "superforce" at ultra-high levels of energy."...
"The real burden in the next three centuries will not be the development of fancy mathematics, but the experimental testing of these ambitious theories. All current thinking about total unification assumes that the effects of linking all the forces and particles together will only become manifest at energies that are some trillion times greater than those currently attainable in particle accelerators. Probably we shall never reach such energies directly" ( A Theory of Everything" Volume 21 of "The World of Science)​
 
Actually... .I think that you are incorrect......
and just as electromagnetism, gravity, weak and strong nuclear force could be considered to be "stuff"... If you do a search in Sciforums for the name Chaim Henry Tejman M. D. you will see quotations by me on Wave Theory by Dr. Tejman that to my thinking imply exactly that higher and more fundamental energy behaves somewhat like "stuff" ..... .but.....
we are scared of the implications of this because one of the very simple implications is that evolution did NOT BEGIN in a four dimensional space time continuum.
You know that quoting "Chaim Henry Tejman M.D." isn't helping your case, right?
 
String Theory is just sci-fi, you do know that, right?

No.... I do not know that....... and I believe that those who do not take String Theory seriously do so out of their own fears of what is obviously implied from it. See post number twenty four here for several paragraphs from a simple explanation on String Theory from an article back in the 1990's that Dr. Stephen Hawking either wrote or assisted in.
 
You know that quoting "Chaim Henry Tejman M.D." isn't helping your case, right?

Just because somebody here on this forum does not comprehend the brilliance of Chaim Henry Tejman M. D's writings......
(in my opinion this is at least partly because they are scared of the implications of his theories)...... this does not mean that I will give up on
feeling that his publishings deserve the Origin of Life Prize.
 
No.... I do not know that....... and I believe that those who do not take String Theory seriously do so out of their own fears of what is obviously implied from it. See post number twenty four here for several paragraphs from a simple explanation on String Theory from an article back in the 1990's that Dr. Stephen Hawking either wrote or assisted in.
I've read a bit about String Theory (I'm not expert) however there is no evidence for it after all these years and probably never will be any.
 
Just because somebody here on this forum does not comprehend the brilliance of Chaim Henry Tejman M. D's writings......
(in my opinion this is at least partly because they are scared of the implications of his theories)...... this does not mean that I will give up on
feeling that his publishings deserve the Origin of Life Prize.

It's a bit of a cop out, don't you think, to imply that anyone who doesn't agree with an idea with no basis in fact is doing so because they are "afraid".
 
It's a bit of a cop out, don't you think, to imply that anyone who doesn't agree with an idea with no basis in fact is doing so because they are "afraid".

Believe that if you wish!!!!

Whatever makes you feel better is up to you to believe if you want to.
 
just as electromagnetism, gravity, weak and strong nuclear force could be considered to be "stuff"
Ummm could be considered = is not stuff
If you do a search
I have to much discussion going on to go off on a search sorry
fundamental energy behaves somewhat like "stuff"
Sorry no idea what fundamental energy is. Please enlighten (hint do not post a link or reference) - YOU reply thanks, within this thread
And behaves somewhat like stuff = is not stuff

:)
 
Ummm could be considered = is not stuff

I have to much discussion going on to go off on a search sorry

Sorry no idea what fundamental energy is. Please enlighten (hint do not post a link or reference) - YOU reply thanks, within this thread
And behaves somewhat like stuff = is not stuff

:)


All that I have are quotations and links.....
if that is not good enough....
my apologies but I personally cannot summarize the theories of Chaim Henry Tejman M. D. any more than he did already.

I agree with his assertion that the myriad of subatomic particles seem to behave somewhat like formations that astronomers observe.
 
I'm not so much into "believing" and more into evidence based theories.

Have you listened to any of the near death experience accounts of Dr. Eben Alexander?

He has the ability to explain what he observed in terms that make the basic near death experience account understandable to anybody who understands the technical jargon used by neuroscientists.
 
I personally

Albert Einstein most famously said

If you can't explain it to a six-year-old, you don't understand it yourself.

Along with
If you can't explain it to your grandmother........

And
If you can't explain it simply you don't understand it well enough.

So much I don't understand and not going to go anywhere near trying to explain

If I think I know and give incorrect explnation I'm happy to be corrected

Work on it instead of sending others out on information and fact finding missions

:)
 
Albert Einstein most famously said

If you can't explain it to a six-year-old, you don't understand it yourself.

Along with
If you can't explain it to your grandmother........

And
If you can't explain it simply you don't understand it well enough.

So much I don't understand and not going to go anywhere near trying to explain

If I think I know and give incorrect explnation I'm happy to be corrected

Work on it instead of sending others out on information and fact finding missions

:)

Some readers like quotations....
those who don't.....
can ignore me if they like but one near death experiencer reported meeting Dr. Albert Einstein and the discussion that they had was intriguing to say the least.

http://www.allaboutchristian.com/spirituality/
(Christian Andreason, chapter three)....
Our spiritual brother, Albert Einstein

A moment happened in the beginning of my experience where Albert Einstein, the famous scientist, came forward to speak with me. While at first I could not make out his face, by the 'feel' of his energy I knew exactly who he was as soon as he appeared.

To be perfectly honest, I really never had much of an interest in Einstein before, so I found it interesting that I was seeing him now, and what amazed me at the time was that he seemed to know exactly who I waseven though he died in 1955, 14 years before I was born.

He explained that he wanted to answer a few questions I was starting to have about some of the codes and scientific theories I was now seeing on the screen held behind me. He told me it was important for me to fully understand, so I could accomplish my destiny on Earth. I remember wondering how it was that he could speak of and claim to know of my destiny, when I myself did not have a clue?

As he spoke to me about space, time and relativity I was aware that Einstein had been (and still was) a great teacher who not only had been born to our world, but that he had also come to many other worlds' in God's Super Universe to help them advance in scientific and social understanding. As his energy stood before me, it was like being near an old friend who just happened to be tremendously brilliant, and what I found completely remarkable was how he was able to explain even the most complex notion in such an easy to understand way.

Not only was he incredibly kind, sincere and funny; he always seemed to be completely interested in my views. We started discussing sound and the use of music and harmonies for the purpose of transporting energy into a space. It surprised me that I actually started to believe I knew more about this particular subject than he seemed toand when he showed me a supernaturally displayed diagram of what the Universe looks like before and after sound has entered it, I challenged him in our discussion about the use of tonal dissonance, which led to another discussion about the opening of some sort of time/space portal and the filling of space with atomic, neutrino type matter. I understood that this matter absorbed and recorded absolutely that happened within the space it filled. Without thinking, I began speaking about the use of positive and negative energy, and that if too much challenging energy fills a space, the atmosphere becomes tainted and is never as pure as before. We spoke about Nazi Germany and how the vile actions performed there, when Hitler was in power, forever altered the energies in that part of the world.

Ultimately, Einstein seemed highly interested (and even humored) by my assertions. And as he saw that I was shocked by my own sudden burst of self confidence, he congratulated me on what he called my "chutzpa" (hut-spa)a word I had never heard before until then, which I later found out was a Yiddish term expressing, "sudden and unexpected boldness." While our actual conversation seemed brief in comparison with everything else I encountered during my NDE, Einstein did manage to impart a tremendous amount of information to me in a way that I can only call, "telepathic"not only could I hear his thoughts and explanations fully in my mind, I could also see actual multi-dimensional, moving, colorful demonstrations as well. It was like watching a live documentary that is being broadcast into your mind. Unfortunately, most of what I was shown is not always easy for me to recall at will, but I am sure it is all still subconsciously with me, because I will sometimes find myself suddenly able to explain some of the things Einstein showed me on a "as needed" basis during my one-on-one sessionsand then be completely stunned by what I just remembered!.

I personally find that testimony impressive....
even the part about Christian Andreason being taught the Yiddish word "chutzpah."
 
Always with the famous people

Never the taxi driver

:)

That is a good point.....
but what if from his perspective Dr. Albert Einstein would regard Mr. Christian Andreason as somewhat "famous" due to the seriousness of the job ahead of him at this critical time in history?
 
but what if from his perspective Dr. Albert Einstein would regard Mr. Christian Andreason as somewhat "famous" due to the seriousness of the job ahead of him at this critical time in history?
Oh, you think that - completely unlike all the other recipients of "great wisdom" - this one is actually going to do something?
Why is this time in history particularly critical?
 
Back
Top