superstring01
Moderator
Wasn't the censorship reversed? I believe Chief Justice Plazma found in your favor, by a vote of 1 to 0.
~String
~String
James R's Independent Review Process
- Thread starter Gustav
- Start date
- Status
superstring01
Moderator
Well, to be sure, I wouldn't be re-posting that thing again.
But, generally speaking, wasn't your ban reversed by Plazma? If not Plazma (we don't have daily Mod meetings in the Situation Room anymore), then I wonder who reversed it. Shit, seriously, I cannot keep up with all this stuff.
But you're back. Back again. Gustav's back. Guess who's back, guess who's back. . . . blah blah blah. Hell, just for fun, let's all sing along: Without Me
~String
But, generally speaking, wasn't your ban reversed by Plazma? If not Plazma (we don't have daily Mod meetings in the Situation Room anymore), then I wonder who reversed it. Shit, seriously, I cannot keep up with all this stuff.
But you're back. Back again. Gustav's back. Guess who's back, guess who's back. . . . blah blah blah. Hell, just for fun, let's all sing along: Without Me
~String
Thanks, I got curiouse.
That's some fairly good (generic) advice actually - remembering what I do for a lving :3
I'm not sure that I am terribly surprised though - one of the things that surprised me though was, when I managed to track down the story that appeared in the Evening Standard regarding the flyer, based on what I had seen at (for example) fitwatch, I was expecting to see the flyer reproduced in its entirety, or quoted fully, but no, as it turns out, the Evening Standard story was initially discussing the advice provided by someone else, and mentioned the flyer in passing, citing maybe two or three lines from it in passing, before discussing the police appeal for alleged offenders to come come forward (or for people to dob suspects in). And therein lies the difference, I suppose, Indymedia is reproducing it in its entirety, which could be construed as endorsing it, where as the Evening Standard cited parts of it, as part of a balanced report.
superstring01
Moderator
No.
I have it on good authority that we are under orders to lighten up on attempting to police those types of things. This should not to be construed as to augment or decrease other rules and regulations within the forum.
A crystal ball helps.
~String
It was reversed by me.
superstring01
Moderator
James R said:
stop shooting first and asking questions later
ahh, in that case.....james
remove both my infractions and restore the original post that contained the poster
remove the infractions!
Nope. Not everyone else. I found Me-Ki-Gal's writing style so hard to follow, and its content so irrelevant to most of the topics addressed, that I simply decided to skip his posts. For me, it's not worth it -- too much noise. So he made it to my Ignore List. (Sorry, man! Nothing personal, is just that I lack the patience to decipher your posts.)
Just stop being a humourless vegetarian.
I rather enjoyed that video My dear . Oh to funny . That em guy is pretty good. Really! You know what the original meaning of the symbol E means don'tcha? House . So what does Me really mean in the most ancient of meanings .
I try my best . Some Americans find my posts some what easy I would think . Maybe not . Maybe Californians . Maybe not them either . Maybe you should give the peripheral noise in your personal life a shot thou . Just saying . Might help you to understand Me posts . Maybe not . Never know.
You would not believe the meaning of my post if you did understand them probably. They are way out there I realize . Multi layered is how I think of them . I tell you what . When I think back on them I laugh my ass off cause some of them are just to funny for words . Fuck I amaze Me self how funny they can be . Not intentional mind you . Just a anomaly of been me
superstring01
Moderator
- Status