jerking off
- Thread starter greenboy
- Start date
pee wee
I loved his show, I still do. I am so sorry about what happened, this seems like somebody was behind this guy to destroy him, I would not be surprise Disney was behind this, what Disney sees as a threat, they purchase it or destroy it.
All normal red blooded American guy went in one time or another to one of those movie theaters and whack the Monkey, I think that's is a normal behavior for a young sexually unsatisfying guy. I still miss Pee Wee. I still have his doll in a box in my attic. I still do..
I loved his show, I still do. I am so sorry about what happened, this seems like somebody was behind this guy to destroy him, I would not be surprise Disney was behind this, what Disney sees as a threat, they purchase it or destroy it.
All normal red blooded American guy went in one time or another to one of those movie theaters and whack the Monkey, I think that's is a normal behavior for a young sexually unsatisfying guy. I still miss Pee Wee. I still have his doll in a box in my attic. I still do..
Last edited:
So your telling us that Disney placed him in the porn theater and then placed his penis in his hand and then demanded him to start to jerk off. Yeah that sounds like something Disney would do. And BTW only perverts jack off in theater most use the bathroom or when in public the Bathroom stalls.
And you wife is likely only saying that as to not hurt you feelings I think.
Fortunately I've never been a sexually unsatisfying guy.
Ask any of my G/Fs.
Well, that's just going to lead us down the road of "objective morality - does it exist?" We all know where that leads... I was referring more to "right" and "wrong" as it pertains to legality, it seemed like that was what the OP was talking about. 'Course, it's always fun to poke the theists with "morality"
Maybe so, but any number of things are illegal that can't be proved to have happened. In keeping with the overall theme of this thread, let's take "sexting" as an example. If some underage chickie takes a shine to you Enmos, and they decide to send you a pic they took of themselves naked
- you are guilty of possession of child pornography. This is in spite of the fact that there is absolutely no way of proving that you were aware that pic was on your cell phone or that you even knew the girl in question. If you erase said pic, the whole thing can't even be proved to have happened at all! But, you were still guilty for a period of time...What a crock that is, eh? We've had threads on this forum regarding sexting already, I think. It seems to be on the increase here in the states...
Regardless, good points. I totally agree that something should not be illegal if it can not even be proven to have ever happened.
So all those perverts who plant cameras in the ladies restroom are in the clear.
LostInThought7
Registered Senior Member
"also this webpage cites he was charged with just indecent exposure. so maybe masturbating in the bathroom isn't illegal, unless you can be charged with indecent exposure in a bathroom stall"
Wait a minute...what if you were masturbating under or through your clothes? Since that's not indecent exposure (...or is it?), will you still get in trouble?
Wait a minute...what if you were masturbating under or through your clothes? Since that's not indecent exposure (...or is it?), will you still get in trouble?
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
Something can only be considered morally wrong if a certain kind of act can in fact, by definition, be determined to have happened. So I'm not talking about a kind of act that can generally be solved but that someone occasionally gets away with.Well, that's just going to lead us down the road of "objective morality - does it exist?" We all know where that leads... I was referring more to "right" and "wrong" as it pertains to legality, it seemed like that was what the OP was talking about. 'Course, it's always fun to poke the theists with "morality"
Maybe so, but any number of things are illegal that can't be proved to have happened. In keeping with the overall theme of this thread, let's take "sexting" as an example. If some underage chickie takes a shine to you Enmos, and they decide to send you a pic they took of themselves naked
What a crock that is, eh? We've had threads on this forum regarding sexting already, I think. It seems to be on the increase here in the states...
Regardless, good points. I totally agree that something should not be illegal if it can not even be proven to have ever happened.
Something is only morally wrong if it affects other people in a negative way. Right?
As long as it doesn't affect anybody there's no problem whatsoever. And that's pretty good too, I don't need any thought-police..
Well I think if you want to do whatever you want to do in a public toilet is okey as far you are not exposing yourself in front of people/children. I took a partime job this summer helping a trucker to drive from point A to point B yes I have the license, and we took a round trip from Miami to Pennsylvania, I went in one of those Truck Stops to a shower, around 2:00am the shower stall were granting enough privacy, but I heard the sounds coming from one shower, first I though they were a couple but later when I was shaving I saw two big beefy guys coming from the shower, they were obviously having sex. I don't really care if you do it with a guy or a girl, they took a look at me and "goodmorning me" and I goodmorning back, we had small talk, and I finished and left, I thought they were worry about me going to squeal them, but I don't really care. That was very private if you ask me.
WillNever
Valued Senior Member
You were in a public bathroom. That's like saying the person in your neighboring stall is violating your privacy because you can hear the sound of their pee hitting the water.