No, any mass must have a density that sees the surface escape velocity equal "c" if it becomes a BH: You can twist as much as you like but nothing changes that fact.
Of course once that stage is reached, further collapse is compulsory, which certainly invalidates any Mitchel like "Dark Star" or BNS.
No I gave the proper information as everyone else did, and then used WIKI to show rajish he was again wrong.WIKI is your source of intellectual information , pad ?
well carry on
No I gave the proper information as everyone else did, and then used WIKI to show rajish he was again wrong.
WIKI is ok, and certainly far more informative then agenda laden god botherers that like to come to science forums and attempt to refute 100 years of cosmology....good for a laugh though.
but you carry on.
Sure river!
Sure river!
Quarks are particles consisting of energy, angular momentum, spin, charge, and color.
Quarks could be made of smaller particles, but so far there is no evidence to support or even hint at this. If this were true, then those smaller particles likewise will not be "made of energy" either....they will only have energy.
Energy is not a substance; it is though an attribute of other things such as adding to mass and spacetime curvature and a measure of mass.
What source? I'm sure you are able to google to confirm what I and others are trying to relay to rajish.....any source actually is the answer to your question.
Thank you for the response. In order for me to visualize it, in addition the billiard example, could we also use say, a collision of beach-balls? IOW, each ball is so flexible as to absorb the impact but immediately return to their former state after impact?
Not a bad example. So yes in general there is an intermediate situation where at least part of the KE (or all for exact head-on collision) becomes PE but then restores fully to KE in the ideal elastic case.
As with KE, momentum exchange is a function of reference frame. But even with inelastic i.e. lossy collisions where net KE is not conserved, net momentum before always equals net momentum after. A slight subtlety is that any heat generated is radiation which becomes a small part of the net momentum balance. Negligible in most cases, like with billiard or beach balls.
I suppose - depending on the exact meaning of that piece!
Yes and yes. In the pool table frame, which is the one a pool player needs to worry about.
An exact analysis of two billiard balls colliding and ricocheting off each other would be extremely complex. As elastic solids, impact will set up a whole set of vibration modes - waves propagating back and forth in a complicated pattern. The 'miracle' is nearly, but not all, of that wave motion ends up refocusing and converting back to KE of the whole ball(s).
Certainly you read river , nonsense...
I mean nuclear wars on Mars! Even MR gave that one the heave ho! 
No, any mass must have a density that sees the surface escape velocity equal "c" if it becomes a BH: You can twist as much as you like but nothing changes that fact.
Of course once that stage is reached, further collapse is compulsory, which certainly invalidates any Mitchel like "Dark Star" or BNS.
But if all forms of energy display a certain fundamental order, does that not suggest forms of dynamical mathematical functions at work?
I'm saying what is obvious and which most intelligent people have interpreted me as saying.
I'm saying as what accepted cosmology and physics dictates.
With all respect rajish, I have seen you in action before.
Indirectly, this is what the was talking about.
With all respect rajish, I have seen you in action before.
I suggest you recognise your non existent expertise and credentials on this matter, and check out some reputable links or references....Plenty about and I have given plenty.