Apollo 15 flag, facing air resistance; proving the fraud of alleged manned moon landings.
These two videos show that the flag had started to move before he got close enough to touch it.
Initial Apollo 15 Flag Movement
The flag that moved
This video shows that the flag movement is consistent with atmosphere.
Comedy spam time, posted probably about 500 times all over the internet.
Show me exactly where these are ruled out:
1. Video artefact blooming.
2. Flagpole settling in stand.
3. Static discharge.
4. Kicked soil striking the bottom of the pole sending small vibration.
Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax: The Apollo 15 flag (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)
"I have uploaded 7 videos on youtube analysing this subject. There are two main issues to deal with, namely the initial movement, and the subsequent movement after Dave Scott has passed by the flag.
Video 1
This video simply highlights the initial movement.
Video 2
In this video, I demonstrate that Jarrah White is self debunking his own claims. He runs past his own badly hung flag, yet fails to move it until he is level with it. He is considerably closer than Dave Scott was to the Apollo 15 flag. There is the barest of movements as he draws level.
Video 3
In this video I show the original Apollo 15 flag moving for 30 seconds. Using Jarrah's 66% slowed down footage theory, that equates to 20 seconds.
White then proceeds to run past his own flag several times, yet is only able to move his flag for 4-5 seconds. That equates to 6-7.5 seconds adjusted up 150%.
With White's flag, there is a totally different billowing movement, a rapid stop, and indeed a much more aggresive motion. No gentle back and forth prolonged swaying as per Apollo 15 flag.
Video 4
This video shows a wide book being dropped from 1 metre and failing to move a plastic bag until it is a few inches away from it.
Video 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4gbMT-Zs2Y
In this video, I isolate several frames and show the flag with movement and Dave Scott at least four feet away. I show several color filtered shots that highlight the actual flagpole itself moving, that is clearly impossible. This one video debunks the "wall of air" contention completely, since air will only be pushed a few inches in front of a body in motion. The plastic bag demonstrated this.
Video 6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ888vXaKNM
In this video I take it a step further. Using frame grabs, I show Dave Scott about 6 feet away from the flag, with clear movement.
Video 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JixGapxKURc
This final video is my personal favorite. If you watch no other video, watch this one.
I show White debunking himself in the most totally conclusive way. Simpler if you just watch it.
Update
From apollohoax.net, user Headlikearock has made a very significant observation concerning the lens flares on the flag. They actually move alongside the flag itself, the flagpole and parts of the ground. Here is the direct link, and the picture below:-
http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r81/headlikearock/Apollo 15/flag-wave-new-gif_zps435e5ced.gif
Summary:
There are two possible explanations for the initial movement.
The movement is a camera blooming effect, caused by Dave Scott entering the frame and the camera blooming with CRT effect to compensate.
It is consistent with the whole flag shifting right, including the flagpole itself, and also consistent with slightly more movement to the edge caused by the wide angle lens' natural distortion to objects at its edge.
The movement could also be caused by ground vibration, since the flagpole is seated into the regolith, which has a consistency similar to sandstone just below it's surface.
I tend to favor the former of these two, but I am open to the other.
What I am not open to, is a mystery wall of air pushing against a nylon flag from 6 feet away, 4 feet away, or even 2 feet away.
Finally, the main movement:
The movement of the flag as the astronaut passes, is simply caused by his arm brushing it. There are two debunking videos explaining it perfectly......."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbJvgqoeFSU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx5H7Rwfkjo
Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax: The Apollo 17 Flag (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)
"Since you wish to include this as part of your wall of spam, I shall debunk it properly.
Video 1:-
Here is my first video showing the whole clip from the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal. In this video, the astronauts crossover a few times, so the idea they are using "wires" that we never see, can be quickly debunked.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQxQSzj3Khw
Video 2:-
Now, we have discounted the use of wires, since it would be impossible to stop them tangling! Here is the next video with the film firstly sped up 150%. The dust and flag motion is excessive, and several movements by the astronauts look very odd. There are short glimpses of vertical motion showing that it still is too slow for Earth gravity. I then speed the film up 200%, and now it all looks patently absurd.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPLoqxacpFI
Video 3:-
The final video is a debunk of the motion, showing also that the flagpole is rotating, causing a massive dampening effect to any pendulum swing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc6sqIe3Aio"
https://www.brighteon.com/5545a13a-1b33-4c2a-9393-050bac22b91d
Moronic. A chemist doing physics where he fails to understand a multi-pivot complex pendulum made of fabric with its main axis across the diagonal! His main assumption on which he bases his entire video is completely flawed, he uses the drop height of the flag when it oscillates across the diagonal. Epic fail and on which you are dishonestly ignoring since this has been responded to you many many times.
http://www.geschichteinchronologie.com/atmosphaerenfahrt/28_moon-stones-from-Earth-ENGL.html
(excerpt)
------------------------------
"Moonstones" have no possibility to be compared on moon itself, because there is no possibility of a neutral control on the "moon". So, it's permitted for anybody to claim this or that stone would come from the "moon". Also when certain "moon probes" are said having landed on the moon also this is not controllable. And it's not possible to control if these "moon probes" have brought stones or dust from the "moon" to the Earth or not either. At the end the super powers "USA" and "SU" claim together to the public that "moonstones" would be "very similar" to "Earth stones". This "similarity" brings up some new questions (Wisnewski, p.209).
He quotes from a book written by a moron hoax believer. How do you submit this as evidence? Geologists have analysed rocks and determined that they have no terrestrial weathering, have solar isotopes and patterns that could only be from low gravity. This precludes Earth rocks and meterites.
Lunar rover on the moon. Was it a RC model? (Extended Edition)
Ludicrous. If you believe this you are as mad as a hatter.
The proof that the LRO photos are photoshopped
Once again ignoring detailed responses. The idiot who made that video has "analysed" internet crops from huge TIFF files of many gigabytes in size. Of course these are produced using editing software!
