Moved: A Shrine To Anoushka

[Dr Lou Natic]

Haha
You just can't stand that as hard as you try to be an artistic new age faggot, you're still too "square" to stomach the freedom of my ideas.

Making a drinking fountain out of a urinal? Avant garde.

Tiassa: "a urinal made into a drinking fountain, I'm stuck in the 1960s and this is interesting *fingerclap*"
*exhibition of dr lou natic*
Tiassa: *face melts* *mashes delete button in blind faceless panic*

Face it, you're not cool anymore, it's not the end of the world.
Maybe now you can focus on being a parent and a non-drug addict.

 

[Gustav]

That has to be the funniest thing you've ever written, Lou.

i agree. while posturing is the norm in sci and is expected behavior, that was wildly ridiculous. the cunt is unable to convince of his avant garde credentials. his lack of credibility is further reinforced by his unfamiliarity with the french language

ja
the clincher was his misspelling of the term.

"avante guarde" rather than "avant garde"

poor little cunt. poor little silly cunt
begone, peasant. your pretensions are merely ridiculous

 

[Gustav]

...the freedom of my ideas.

mmm
i sense a sincerity and confidence that could only stem from a full blown case of psychosis

/rotfl

i believe "pathetic" has been taken to new heights and quite possibly, redefined.
i shall inform the oed

 

[Gustav]

... we complain that the mods don't get us.

to whom it may fucking concern

this is not a complaint
this is a...."why?"

complaints are......you are doing whatnot to me....unfairly.....singled out..etc

a rational justification of actions is all i seek
there is none as i have been "allowed" to recreate thread
my existence is now subject to the whims and fancies of dumbfucksci

further i do not seek understanding from the mod team
they lack the intellectual capacity to do so

members ask for clarification
mods do not. they merely punish

until that changes, dumbfucksci will be considered the enemy
why? cos you waste my precious time

 

[Gustav]

post 18 will be raped brutally
you have been warned

vert
do you ever tire of divining my intent?
how is it you know me better than i know myself?

ahh
of course
a megalomaniacal fool

fuck
inapt comparisons, bogus analogies, fallacious statements, blatant untruths
yet you persist in here
year 5? 6?

i could shred yer ass for good
but that was then
you are simply a freakish relic
nothing new
just the same old refrain

contrast with me
i still wow
cos i am honest
and i care

 

[outlandish]

you guys are like thugs
i leave my car on the sidewalk. go into youtube for linkage, i come out and the car has been jacked. my property spied in other folks houses.

pure vandalism. a shakedown. i was minus the paperwork. no backsheesh.
it is disgusting how needy you fucks are.

oh
are you having the last pic?
you offering me baloney?

i see a jugular exposed
a posture of abject surrender

but i am tired of this
i rather leave sci
i fear i am not aging gracefully
better to eliminate stressors

pull yerself together

/bitch slap

 

[invert_nexus]

complaints are......you are doing whatnot to me....unfairly.....singled out..etc

No. There is a policy in place in the art and culture subforum. Said policy is that one hot chick thread is plenty. Same goes for hoy guy threads. You're not being unfairly singled out. It was actually Peta's obsession with asian femboys that put this policy in place.
Sorry that I didn't unfairly single you out this time, I'll try harder next time so that your ego will be assuaged.

there is none as i have been "allowed" to recreate thread

Provided that you do better next time. Like a topic and stuff.

mods do not. they merely punish

Punish?
You really need a sense of perspective. All I did was move your inane thread into a thread where hot chicks were already being posted. A thread in which you had previously announced your intention to post about this woman who is, apparently, quite hot and stuff.

And, I explained quite clearly in my first post why I merged your thread.
I've also repeated my explanation several times.

do you ever tire of divining my intent?

I personally don't give a shit about you, Gustav. You seriously need to get over yourself. All I did was cleanup the shrine somebody constructed out of old boxes of Lucky Charms on aisle three.

a megalomaniacal fool

Yeah. You really should work on that.

 

[Gustav]

No. There is a policy in place in the art and culture subforum. Said policy is that one hot chick thread is plenty. Same goes for hoy guy threads. You're not being unfairly singled out. It was actually Peta's obsession with asian femboys that put this policy in place.
Sorry that I didn't unfairly single you out this time, I'll try harder next time so that your ego will be assuaged.

pardon but do you read? i asserted that i do not see this thread as a complaint. yet you insidiously maintain i do? should you not even wait until my contrary assertion be situated so as not to be so easily referenced. shit. 3rd post up.

you troll rustily, scumbag

Provided that you do better next time. Like a topic and stuff.

you know the subject. you seem to also know what criteria is required
enlighten thru a synopsis, the form you demand of this thread.

the birthing is running into serious difficulties
a clash b/w parent and midwife
perhaps a knife ripping into the gut?

Punish?
You really need a sense of perspective. All I did was move your inane thread into a thread where hot chicks were already being posted. A thread in which you had previously announced your intention to post about this woman who is, apparently, quite hot and stuff.

yes punish
i come here to post
why bother if i cannot?

this would have been an innocuous and uncontroversial thread

here is the quote. she is more than just hot.........

mongrels
vermin

this thread has been sullied by skanks and ho's
my goddess, the most perfect form
talent, intellect and beauty
shall never grace this foul thread
begone, connoisseurs of sub-human filth
begone
i shall devote a shrine to my beloved
i'll have you maggots know she is no mere mortal
she is an angel
descended from the heavens
to be by my side
not yours
fuck off

ja
a fully clad girl clutching a sitar
in a sea of scantily clad bitches

intellect, talent and beauty were descriptors that differentiated from the norm
a goddamn sitar elicits...."She's got a huge shnozz."
did you even wonder about the juxtaposition of instrument and player? you find that sexual? hot?

And, I explained quite clearly in my first post why I merged your thread.
I've also repeated my explanation several times.

so? repeating irrationalities make em what? acceptable?

I personally don't give a shit about you, Gustav. You seriously need to get over yourself. All I did was cleanup the shrine somebody constructed out of old boxes of Lucky Charms on aisle three.

elaborate
i shall then scrutinize you and your offerings

 

[Gustav]

that quote was merely rhetoric utilized for emphasis
exumed's chick is hotter than shit
my sasha grey fucks like mad crazy and has the best ass in the business
i love that thread

you a faggot, vert?

 

[Gustav]

a single poster, peta, has so traumatized you that you break with tradition and replace it with fascism

/weeps

 

[Gustav]

There is a sticky thread in this forum for random links.
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=68607

I'll allow this thread to remain open for a day as a courtesy before moving it.

A point to consider is that providing a topic other than just a link might create a thread worthy of its own life.

excellent

/kowtow

 

[Gustav]

i lik this internets webbys
wht u lik??

/affectionate mockery

 

[invert_nexus]

Talking to you is like Jon Stewart on Crossfire.
You're just playing a game.
Honest? Yeah. Right.
I've explained myself sufficiently. Anything further is just wasting time and energy.

You may create another thread on Anoushka, if it is more than hot pics and actually has a topic of discussion, then I'll allow it to stand. If not, it doesn't.

Good day.

 

[Tiassa]

The freedom of your ideas

Face it, you're not cool anymore

Never was, Lou.

Maybe now you can focus on being a parent and a non-drug addict

Now that is original.

Let us know when you get back to the ... uh ... avant garde.

You just can't stand that as hard as you try to be an artistic new age faggot, you're still too "square" to stomach the freedom of my ideas.

(chortle!)

Awesome.

"If you don't believe in evolution, than you are hearby forbidden from using the word 'hereditary'." (Dr. Lou Natic, February 15, 2004)​

Ah ... the freedom of your ideas.

Don't click this link.

 

[Reiku]

Cricky... what i have missed.

 

[outlandish]

If I allowed such threads, then the Art forum would already have become the hot Asian dude forum from Peta's postings.

aahh, so vertie likes a bit of john abraham eh?
good taste, all my cousin's girlie friens say i look like him
..but alas my body isnt quite there , but hey

 

[invert_nexus]

this is not a complaint
this is a...."why?"

complaints are......you are doing whatnot to me....unfairly.....singled out..etc

a rational justification of actions is all i seek

Ah. Wait.
Sorry, I misunderstood. I get you. You really are difficult to understand sometimes, Gustav. You'd really do yourself a favor by clearing up your communications, but that's your prerogative.

Anyway.
I've already given the reason why. You can call it irrational or whatever, but it is the reason why. I have stated numerous times that I will not allow more hot picture threads to be created in the art forum. Period. Your thread contained three posts of nothing but pictures, then one post containing fawning praise.
I saw no indication that the thread had any topic other than to praise her beauty.
Thus, it was moved into the relevant thread.

You've stated that I have changed tradition or whatever, I state that your memory is shorter than your dick. I've seen an enormous number of threads locked since my arrival here. The crime? Having no topic of discussion.

The opening post is where the topic is to be presented. Double posting is, in general, frowned upon. And there is no reason to spread out the opening topic over half the first page. It merely confuses the topic. You have all the time in the world to fashion your thread before pressing post, I suggest you spend some time doing just that. You'll have a much better chance of creating a successful thread that way.

I apologize if I didn't give you enough time to create your 'shrine', but you really should have elucidated your topic in the opening post. I believe that I have committed no wrong here, but am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.

So. As I said, you are free to try again.
I, as moderator, will determine whether or not the thread will stand or sink. It is likely that, if you actually have a topic rather than just photos and swill, the thread will stand. There is no strict guideline on what is acceptable and what is not. Just some general rules of thumb.
A topic of discussion being one of them. This topic is generally presented in an opening post.


I doubt I will respond any further in this thread as I think there is nothing further to say on this topic. Perhaps something noteworthy will be presented later, but I doubt it. The topic is rather simple.

So. Once more.
Good day.

And, I see nothing wrong with a little pizza on our time.

 

[Gustav]

nicely done
that said, art is best directly apprehended.
propaganda is for the weak of will.
often a source of astonishment for the author