LMAO... Michael seems like your knowledge is limited to answering-islam.com. lol. You can go worship silas as much as you want but the simple truth is that you believe in forgery of silas, I am not suprise, people like you love to believe those specail interest internet sites over anything else. lol. Please go ahead and beleive what you wish and take silas as the authority on islam.
Just too funny.
Actaually I ran across that on an Arabic News site:
Arab Islamic News
"Abdullah ibn Khatal used to be a Muslim. The Prophet once sent him to collect zakah from people who lived far away. He traveled with another man and a servant of his who was a Muslim. At one stage on the way they stopped. He gave the servant orders to slaughter a big goat and prepare food for him while he himself went to sleep. When he woke up, he discovered that the servant had not done anything. He killed his servant and, fearing the Prophet’s punishment, reverted to idolatry. He also had two slave girls who used to sing for him and for his companions songs full of abuse of the Prophet. The Prophet’s instructions specified that the two slave girls should also be killed. The man was killed as he was actually holding on to the coverings of the Kaaba. Abu Barzah Al-Aslami and Saeed ibn Hurayth Al-Makhzumi killed him along with one of his slave girls. The other managed to flee until someone sought a special pardon for her from the Prophet, which he granted."
Here is an English Translation by
Alfred Guillaume of the original Historical work of
Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Yasar who himself was (and is) considered a scholar and historian and whom many credit with witting the oldest Biograph of Mohammad.
Another was Abdullah Khatal of B. Taym b. Ghalib. He had become a Muslim and the apostle sent him to collect the poor tax in company with one of the Ansar. He had with him a freed slave who served him. (He was a Muslim.) When they halted he ordered the latter to kill a goat for him and prepare some food, and went to sleep. When he woke up the man had done nothing, so he attacked and killed him and apostatized. He had two singing-girls Fartana and her friend who used to sing satirical songs about the apostle, so he ordered that they should be killed with him.
So, skywalker, here was have an instance when your prophet, under the authority of your God, commanded that two young singing girls have their
heads chopped off and for one of them - she was indeed murdered!
Was that acceptable behavior skywalker?
You can see, this Muslim man wasn't doing anything more or less heinous than what your own Prophet was purported to have done. Ergo, this man similarly deemed this young girl a
non-innocent and murdered her. If Mohammad had done this you'd think, yup, it's fine. All of you Muslims would.
How do we know that?
Because you're about to tell us
(1) it was OK for Mohammad to command the murder of these two young singing slave girls or
(2) try to say the story is false (which doesn't matter it's accepted Islamic lore - that is, for 1400 year Muslims have seen nothing wrong with Mohammad's actions)
(3) ignore the question altogether
- but what you are
NOT going to do is say it was
immoral and
wrong AND that right there is proof enough of a fundamental flaw in Islam.
Go ahead tell us,
Michael
