Physics Monkey said:"Counters this paper" is rather too generous a phrase, don't you think.
Yea, I do.
More specific would have been to say, "...provides a counter perspective of select portions of this paper." But, I simply wasn't in the mood to type when I posted the link.
That being said, the author of the paper was not addressing the issues of "non-radiative" electronic transitions which were left unaddressed by the original paper. But rather was addressing the issue of why the Klein-Gordon solution was not square integrable in the Dirac solution. Unless of course I missed the point in all the hand waving.