quote me then. i dare you. i double dare you.
Mr.Spock said:really? other then a single paper that says nothing, and lots of anti jewish and israelis links on the web?
you are not an israeli, you never met a lehi activist. this guys gave their lives for future generations-they even wrote a song about their sacrifice. you have me believe they wanted to cooperate with the nazis against the jews in europe?
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1784927&postcount=279
In 1940, Lehi proposed intervening in World War II on the side of Nazi Germany. It offered assistance in "evacuating"[vague] the Jews of Europe, in return for Germany's help in expelling Britain from Mandate Palestine. Late in 1940, Lehi representative Naftali Lubenchik was sent to Beirut where he met the German official Werner Otto von Hentig. Lubenchik told von Hentig that Lehi had not yet revealed its full power and that they were capable of organizing a whole range of anti-British operations.
On the assumption that the destruction of Britain was the Germans' top objective, the organization offered cooperation in the following terms: From the NMO side: full cooperation in sabotage, espionage and intelligence and up to wide military operations in the Middle East and in eastern Europe anywhere where the Irgun had Jewish cells, active and trained and in some places with weapons. From the German side, the following declarations and actions were demanded: (1) Full recognition of an independent Jewish state in Palestine/Eretz Israel (2) That the ability to emigrate to Palestine be conceded to all Jews, with no restriction of numbers, who, in leaving their homes in Europe, by their own will or because of government injunctions. For this purpose there was expressed a need to cancel any transfer plans of Jews to distant countries like Madagascar.
On January 11, 1941 a letter was sent from Vice Admiral Ralf von der Marwitz, the German Naval attaché in Ankara, depicting an offer to "actively take part in the war on Germany's side" in return for German support for "the establishment of the historic Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, bound by a treaty with the German Reich".[17][18] There are three possibilities as to how the offer reached the German Naval attaché in Ankara. One is that en route to Germany, von Hentig was delayed in Ankara and delivered his version of the offer orally to von der Marwitz and von der Marwitz wrote the letter using his words. The second is that Colombani (a general in French intelligence) invented the offer because of personal rivalry between himself and other Vichy officials: this rivalry is known from a paragraph in von der Marwitz' letter, "Colombani is of the opinion that his return to France is a consequence of co-operation of Conti with Minister Pierroton", or, third, that Colombani wanted the offer to fail: he had co-operated with the Mufti of Jerusalem in Lebanon in 1938-1939 and was also the one who took him in his car through Syria to the Iraqi border in 1939.
In any case, von der Marwitz delivered the offer, classified as secret, to the German Ambassador in Turkey and on January 21, 1941 it was sent to Berlin. There was never any response. Von Hentig would later say that he believed it was important to help the Jews establish a country. [19] [20]
(Source)
quote me then. i dare you. i double dare you.
not only do they hold the Palestinian government they also control the police and the army forces in the strip. Hamas has armed militias walking around in the streets of Gaza, no party such as this is allowed to do so and still be participated in democratic elections. the worse is that the people themselves can't protest against the situation which it has brought them into. so in other words this isn't democracy anyway, what will replace it? anything else would be better I guess.If Hamas is destroyed, meaning the elected government of Palestine has been removed by force, what will replace it?
you mean Israel is forced to retaliate in return for the rockets launched towards its people? I agree.Israel seems to be bent on making things worse, year by year.
you mean Israel is forced to retaliate in return for the rockets launched towards its people? I agree.
you mean Israel is forced to retaliate in return for the rockets launched towards its people? I agree.
So Israel's way to 'help' the Palestinian people against what you are describing as a despotic Government is to bomb the living hell out of them? Do you think the Palestinian people, who are fearing for their lives as bombs drop in and around their homes, schools, streets, etc from the air, who are suffering due to having no water or electricity and a dwindling food supply, are going to be thankful to the Israelis? Would you be? I know I wouldn't be. The lesser of the two evils for them at the moment is Hamas. So who do you think they consider the enemy?not only do they hold the Palestinian government they also control the police and the army forces in the strip. Hamas has armed militias walking around in the streets of Gaza, no party such as this is allowed to do so and still be participated in democratic elections. the worse is that the people themselves can't protest against the situation which it has brought them into. so in other words this isn't democracy anyway, what will replace it? anything else would be better I guess.
And Hamas is forced to retaliate in return for the blockades of its territory - an act of war.aaa said:you mean Israel is forced to retaliate in return for the rockets launched towards its people? I agree.
a tiny revolution said:- - - This is from the official Knesset history of the Six Day War:
"Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser blockaded the Straits of Tiran on May 21st and 22nd to all shipping from and to Eilat; the area was open to Israeli ships under UN supervision since 1957, and Israel repeatedly stated that such a blockade will be considered as casus belli (justification for acts of war)."
Of course, there are many differences between the two situations. Just for instance: (1) Israel could still receive shipments by water via the Mediterranean, and (2) Israelis are human beings, - - -
this isn't the same situation. Hamas isn't Hizballah, it is much weaker and striking its armed forces is more availabe for the IDF. all Israel has to do is to keep up the pressure on military objectives basis and eventually Hamas will fall apart. even now they are crying for a cease fire.how are the Israelis doing with acheiving their objectives (assuming to destroy hamas)???? I hope they are doing better than when they tried to destroy hezbollah in 2006...???!!!!!!!!????
This pointless cycle of violence will acheive nothing...
yes the elections are coming soon, hence the need to launch the operation now.Unless of course their is a general election looming soon in israel!!!!
this isn't the same situation. Hamas isn't Hizballah, it is much weaker and striking its armed forces is more availabe for the IDF. all Israel has to do is to keep up the pressure on military objectives basis and eventually Hamas will fall apart. even now they are crying for a cease fire.
.
yes the elections are coming soon, hence the need to launch the operation now.
Final human victims results, since savage attacks ...... "until now"
397 martyrs
2000 WOUNDED
yes it is. but would you consider comitting suicide bombings inside Israeli cities as an act of war? I'm sure that as a sane person you would, meaning that Hamas declared war on Israel long before this whole operation got loose.And Hamas is forced to retaliate in return for the blockades of its territory - an act of war.
and by that Hamas shoots its own foot. it simply doesn't care if its own people starve to death, as long as they can keep their twisted agendas.Israel's blockades have killed far more people than Hamas's rockets have - not to mention the misery inflicted on the rest - disease, malnutrition, medical neglect, etc.
suicide bombings, shooting innocent civillians, hijacking, this is some of the things these guys are doing since the '90s.So who started this? Not Hamas - they just got elected a few months ago.
hummm... perhaps its because of the intifada the Palestinians have started in oct' 2000? or maybe its because of the suicide bombings in the '90s? or the first intifada in the '80s? and so on..Israel has been blockading the Palestinians off and on for years now. They have also been shelling and bombing in civilian areas, sending in soldiers at will, and constructing walls and fencing that encroach on Palestinian territory.
I'm sure it would.That would start a war with almost anyone.
If you like irony, a mere partial blockade started a war with Egypt that was the impetus for the Israeli occupation of Gaza in the first place, forty years ago:
If those 397 (less the kids) are martyrs, then your allah is satan himself. When will you face it, allah is on IDF's side. He directs Israeli missiles straight at your satanist HAMAS' heads, and punishes those who do not remove children from HAMAS' vicinity. I mean, if you're going to use allah so cynically with your religious contemptible rhetoric, it's only fair I could do the same.
Israeli hands were tied. a cease fire has been forced on the Israeli government, the pressure made by the international community had Israel to withdraw all of its forces from south Lebanon.hUMMMMM..... Just like Hezbollah was going to be destoryed!!!
Hamas copied the 'Hizballah model' into Gaza, which has been used against the IDF in south Lebanon; bunkers, tunnels, mine fields, IEDs, rocket launchers, etc - Hamas has learned a lot since July 2006. that is why Israel is using only its airforce for now and not ground troops.yes they are diffferent in appearance, firepower etc etc, but israel seems to be trying the same failed tactics they tried on hezbollah!!
humm what are you trying to say by this, that Israel is much more stronger? yes, that's a well known fact.The thing is as you say Hamas is much wweaker which really tells you something doiesnt it about this tacttic , espicailly considering Hezbollahs weapons arsenal was hardly state of the art either unlike Israels US funded war machine!!!
please elaborate
You can walk this back to WWII if you want to - and you'll find Israeli killing of civilians disproportionate to Israeli civilians getting killed from day one.aaa said:yes it is. but would you consider comitting suicide bombings inside Israeli cities as an act of war? I'm sure that as a sane person you would, meaning that Hamas declared war on Israel long before this whole operation got loose.
I disagree, but lets ignore this one for the sake of the discussion.You can walk this back to WWII if you want to - and you'll find Israeli killing of civilians disproportionate to Israeli civilians getting killed from day one.
correct me if I'm wrong, but I think almost if not ALL nations and their countries were founded byThe founding of Israel was an aggressive act, supported by terrorism and creating a heavily militarized and aggressive State.
during the so called "cease fire", there were still rocket launching by the Palestinians, how come Israel is the first in the violation?The sensible place to start is after the latest ceasefire - which Israel never kept, being in violation on the first day and increasing its violations thereafter. So we say this latest round was started by Israel.
they are an act of war because of Israel's war on terrorism since day 1.The blockades, checkpoints, etc, have been in place since before Hamas existed. They are acts of war,
so what's your plan?and the rocketing of Israel has been a relatively mild response. Hamas lacks the means to do worse, or they probably would - with complete justification. Worse - much worse - has been done to them.
I disagree, but lets ignore this one for the sake of the discussion.
correct me if I'm wrong, but I think almost if not ALL nations and their countries were founded by
wars and violence.
not that I support such action, but I'm truely sorry to inform you that this is the way humans gain territory, or at least used to. anyway, Israel isn't a special case, so you can give up on this point.
during the so called "cease fire", there were still rocket launching by the Palestinians, how come Israel is the first in the violation?
they are an act of war because of Israel's war on terrorism since day 1.
you must understand that Hamas is not the first terror organization nor does it the only terror oganization with the purpose of destroyng the state of Israel.
so what's your plan?
If those 397 (less the kids) are martyrs, then your allah is satan himself. When will you face it, allah is on IDF's side. He directs Israeli missiles straight at your satanist HAMAS' heads, and punishes those who do not remove children from HAMAS' vicinity. I mean, if you're going to use allah so cynically with your religious contemptible rhetoric, it's only fair I could do the same.