i wonder if hamas are going to discuss high kill ratio as well
but they have billy t and other morons who cant see shit to defend them because they are so poor and defenseless against the high ratio killing of the evil israelis
News From Gaza
- Thread starter S.A.M.
- Start date
- Status
i wonder if hamas are going to discuss high kill ratio as well
but they have billy t and other morons who cant see shit to defend them because they are so poor and defenseless against the high ratio killing of the evil israelis
Mr. Spock: "[Palestinians launching unguided rockets into Israel] have billy t and other morons who cant see shit to defend them..."
The disproportionate kill ratio, even considering Gazan vs. Israeli children is an easily-verifiable fact. To acknowledge that obvious disparity is certainly not tantamount to to condoning any violent and indiscriminate Palestinian retaliation. Diverting into accusations of support for terrorism is just another shallow repetition of fact-suppression, an attempt to distract from the truth about casualties in Israel's ethnic wars, by smearing anyone who mentions it.
I was listening recently to a Chinese diplomat, who similarly deflected any criticism of crackdowns in Tibet. It's not hard to recall so many spokesmen and apologists for repressive regimes who have used this same diversionary tactic. The spectacle of intelligent people so conspicuously contorting their reasoning to brazenly divert criticism of policies they defend is strangely fascinating. When such a ruse is played out in person, or on video, I'm drawn to the eyes of the deceiver- often I'm astounded at the matter-of-fact expressions displayed; like there's nobody home, in terms of sincere conscience. Deception may get easier with repetition, becoming reflexive- but there must remain some inner shred of reason within even the most practiced deceivers- some echo of inner rebuke. What do you think, Spock?
The disproportionate kill ratio, even considering Gazan vs. Israeli children is an easily-verifiable fact. To acknowledge that obvious disparity is certainly not tantamount to to condoning any violent and indiscriminate Palestinian retaliation. Diverting into accusations of support for terrorism is just another shallow repetition of fact-suppression, an attempt to distract from the truth about casualties in Israel's ethnic wars, by smearing anyone who mentions it.
I was listening recently to a Chinese diplomat, who similarly deflected any criticism of crackdowns in Tibet. It's not hard to recall so many spokesmen and apologists for repressive regimes who have used this same diversionary tactic. The spectacle of intelligent people so conspicuously contorting their reasoning to brazenly divert criticism of policies they defend is strangely fascinating. When such a ruse is played out in person, or on video, I'm drawn to the eyes of the deceiver- often I'm astounded at the matter-of-fact expressions displayed; like there's nobody home, in terms of sincere conscience. Deception may get easier with repetition, becoming reflexive- but there must remain some inner shred of reason within even the most practiced deceivers- some echo of inner rebuke. What do you think, Spock?
Mr. Spock: "what is a few less jews on the high pad ha hypewaders?"
I resent your implication that I have disregard for the Jewish victims of this mess.
"yes its always israel fault one way or the other"
It is zionist apartheid (Israeli policy) that has provoked this carnage. Both apartheid and the killing need to come to an end.
I resent your implication that I have disregard for the Jewish victims of this mess.
"yes its always israel fault one way or the other"
It is zionist apartheid (Israeli policy) that has provoked this carnage. Both apartheid and the killing need to come to an end.
you can resent all you want, but in the end you blame israel for everything. that says a lot.
you even know what apartheid is? or have a sensible argument what it got to do with zionism?
dont bother to try to answer that.
Mr. Spock: "in the end you blame israel for everything."
That isn't true. I do blame Israel for Israel's oppressive policies against non-Jews. But I often blame my own country (the USA) for facilitating Israel's human rights abuses and military aggressions.
"you even know what apartheid is?"
Yes. It is forced ethnic segregation in a word. Israel has extended the franchise, even after South Africa summoned the wisdom to abolish their peculiar institution. You own it now- sole proprietors.
"or have a sensible argument [about] what [apartheid has] got to do with zionism?"
Zionist policy has instituted apartheid in Israel and the Palestinian ghettos. If Israeli zionists would like to coin their own labels for the apartheid and bantustans that they have created, I'll consider using them.
How would you like me to describe the ethnic segregation of the Holy Land in a word, Spock? What would you prefer we call the isolated ghettos and bantustans of Gaza, Jerusalem, and the West Bank? It's high time Israelis came up with their own terms, if you don't want us to borrow from the closest historical precedents.
That isn't true. I do blame Israel for Israel's oppressive policies against non-Jews. But I often blame my own country (the USA) for facilitating Israel's human rights abuses and military aggressions.
"you even know what apartheid is?"
Yes. It is forced ethnic segregation in a word. Israel has extended the franchise, even after South Africa summoned the wisdom to abolish their peculiar institution. You own it now- sole proprietors.
"or have a sensible argument [about] what [apartheid has] got to do with zionism?"
Zionist policy has instituted apartheid in Israel and the Palestinian ghettos. If Israeli zionists would like to coin their own labels for the apartheid and bantustans that they have created, I'll consider using them.
How would you like me to describe the ethnic segregation of the Holy Land in a word, Spock? What would you prefer we call the isolated ghettos and bantustans of Gaza, Jerusalem, and the West Bank? It's high time Israelis came up with their own terms, if you don't want us to borrow from the closest historical precedents.
Your lack of capacity to think (because it is paralyzed by intense hate) is further demonstrated by name calling replies and even your one quote:I wonder if Hamas is going to discuss high kill ratio as well, but they have Billy T and other morons who can’t see shit to defend them because they are so poor and defenseless against the high ratio killing of the evil Israelis*
"… none of the children were injured but they were very frightened.** This is the reality they have to deal with,' says kibbutz nurse."
How can you call that a High Kill ratio Israel is suffering? In the case you posted with picture, no one was killed by the crude unguided rocket; no one was even injured! - Has your brain totally died?
You just call names and repeat the some old lines as thoughtlessly as a phonograph player does.
-------------------
*I slightly corrected your English: Capitalized the “i” starting your sentence,*** and four times in three proper names. I also made the verb and subject agree in number (Changed your "are" to "is.") - All in your first sentence! I added a comma init too, but that is optional.
If English is your primary language, this is more evidence that your brain is dead, but the record "plays on."
** Israel cannot even claim to be the victim of Hamas’s “High Fright ratio” policy. – Almost all Palestinian kids are very frighten all the time.****, very hungry, and sometimes very thirsty but drinking contaminated water, when Israel turns the electricity off so water pumps do not work.
***I wonder:
Is there any other way to make two errors using only one letter in a sentence? Is being “brain dead” a requirement for that?
****Israeli artillery shells fall somewhere in Palestine routinely almost every day, but because it is “every day” and has been for years, that is not “news” (unless a shell kills an entire family picnicking on the beach, or injures a foreign news reporter, etc.)
Last edited by a moderator:
so we should wait till the next rocket will hit right billy T?
or should i say score. i wonder if you ever consider that above all else the fact i care for israelis is what drives me, and not hate for palestinians.
as a matter of fact they dont interest me at all, only the safety of israelis.
do you have the capacity to understand that? or are you blinded by hate towered jews/israelis you cant comprehend the obvious?
or should i say score. i wonder if you ever consider that above all else the fact i care for israelis is what drives me, and not hate for palestinians.
as a matter of fact they dont interest me at all, only the safety of israelis.
do you have the capacity to understand that? or are you blinded by hate towered jews/israelis you cant comprehend the obvious?
Mr. Spock: "[Palestinians] dont interest me at all, only the safety of israelis."
The safety of Israelis is inextricably bound to the well-being of Palestinians.
The safety of Israelis is inextricably bound to the well-being of Palestinians.
no not at all. in fact israelis would be very safe if there were no palestinians, as they are the ones who jeopardize their well being.
Definitely not.
Israel should have long ago installed the CIWS defense as I suggested years ago and now be destroying 100% of those easy, slow, un-guided, rocket targets as they almost stall at their peak altitude.
Israel has replaced at least once* the original CIWS generation on its warships - probably has the old units, which could kill a supper-sonic sea-skimming missle, even if weaving, most of the time just sitting in some warehouse. Why let any Israeli be killed? (Unless that is to provide the needed justification for the current high kill ratio RETALITORY policy instead of a life-saving DEFENSIVE one.)
It appears to me that Israel's top leadership is also so filled with hate that they too can no longer think or see what is best for Israel and Israelis.
--------------
*I suspect that it is the third generation,which is now on Israeli ships; and that it will soon be "retired" to a wearhouse also as Israeli is going to adopt the even better Rolling Air Frame ship-defense system, I think.
Last edited by a moderator:
Mr. Spock: "israelis would be very safe if there were no palestinians, as they are the ones who jeopardize their well being."
Nice. But since there remain considerable moral and logistical impediments to such a solution, it's an illogical line of thinking, Spock.
Hate: The mind-killer.
Nice. But since there remain considerable moral and logistical impediments to such a solution, it's an illogical line of thinking, Spock.
Hate: The mind-killer.
Teacher: How does this differ, if at all, morally or logically from:
"In fact, the Third Reich would be very safe if there were no Jews, as they are the ones who jeopardize its well being.
Billy: Oh, (frantically waiving hand in air for permission to answer), I know why.
Teacher: "Do you now Billy; then tell us."
Billy: The capital letters and a comma missing from the original are present in the second version of the statement.
Teacher: "Billy do you understand what "morally" and "logically" mean?
Billy: Not exactly Maim, but it did not seem to be important in either statement.
Last edited by a moderator:
that is nonsense, because israel has not retaliated ever since the last holiday,and in many other cases that go unreported. rhe rocket attack are on a daily basis.
i wonder why you dont blame the palestinians for allowing israel to have an excuse for high ratio killing by firing 7000 rockets in 7 years. any guesses?
Last edited:
when morality stopped anti israelis from "understanding" why it is ok to kill israelis?
Teacher: How does this differ, if at all, morally or logically from:
"In fact, the Third Reich would be very safe if there were no Jews, as they are the ones who jeopardize its well being.
Billy: Oh, (frantically waiving hand in air for permission to answer), I know why.
Teacher: "Do you now Billy; then tell us."
Billy: The capital letters and a comma missing from the original are present in the second version of the statement.
Teacher: "Billy do you understand what "morally" and "logically" mean?
Billy: Not exactly Maim, but it did not seem to be important in either statement.
will palrstinians be safe if there were no israelis? from your POV? dont tell me you deny you think that is true.
the problem is people like you who still try to act like the israelis are an oppressed people. most people don't condone the acts against the israelis but they do say that they are partly to blame for them for policies that create the desperation that fuels such acts why don't you try and show a shred of intellectal honesty and some human decency.
funny how the palestinian policies dont fuel anything ha pjdude1219?
i think what fuels the palestinians is the hate they are exposed to from young age.
that goes without saying but i have heard far more from the palestian side saying there actions can and do foster continued conflict almost never hear it from the israeli side
- Status