Paul McCartney is actually dead conspiracy

David C said:
and ignored my video
Click to expand...
I intended to watch it but I was too busy. I've just watched it. It looks like sophistry to me; there are a lot of points that your video didn't cover. Here's what your video analyzed so the viewers can decide for themselves.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/FromOthers/Paul-McCartney-Italian.html
https://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html

I'd always thought that the "Paul is dead" rumor was a publicity stunt until I saw a link to the theory on this site.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/

That guy is a serious truth-seeker and only puts serious stuff on his website.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Paul-McCartney.html


There are lots of documentaries on the internet about this. Some look suspicioiusly like they were planted by the opposition to make the investigators look silly as they contain some silly stuff and some look serious. Here's another one. This guy seems like he's got good intentions.

Who is Paul McCartney?


I think the comparison in post #31 makes it pretty clear that there were two Pauls. There's also the issue of the different eye color (post #37).
 
This thread should be given an award as one the most inane threads on the site.

It has my vote...
 
FatFreddy said:
I think the comparison in post #31 makes it pretty clear that there were two Pauls. There's also the issue of the different eye color (post #37).
Click to expand...
There really is no conspiracy theory so stupid that you won't believe it. Fascinating!
 
FatFreddy said:
I intended to watch it but I was too busy. I've just watched it. It looks like sophistry to me; there are a lot of points that your video didn't cover. Here's what your video analyzed so the viewers can decide for themselves.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/FromOthers/Paul-McCartney-Italian.html
https://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html

I'd always thought that the "Paul is dead" rumor was a publicity stunt until I saw a link to the theory on this site.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/

That guy is a serious truth-seeker and only puts serious stuff on his website.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Paul-McCartney.html


There are lots of documentaries on the internet about this. Some look suspicioiusly like they were planted by the opposition to make the investigators look silly as they contain some silly stuff and some look serious. Here's another one. This guy seems like he's got good intentions.

Who is Paul McCartney?


I think the comparison in post #31 makes it pretty clear that there were two Pauls. There's also the issue of the different eye color (post #37).
Click to expand...

"this is the nearest thing we have to a boe-Ography, .. and to think the most famous musician in the world if he'd written a boeography... how it would sell right...this is the nearest we have to it...it was written by, it was gimmen this fella... thomas you harriot... so he actually published it and put it together... but mccartney ... sir sir paul or call him sir paul... gave hm the material...i believe"

well that concludes it
 
FatFreddy said:
I've just watched it. It looks like sophistry to me; there are a lot of points that your video didn't cover.
Click to expand...

That's your way to dismiss concise and conclusive rebuttal is it? No one actually cares what anything looks like to you.

Some look suspicioiusly like they were planted by the opposition to make the investigators look silly as they contain some silly stuff and some look serious.
Click to expand...

The opposition? Who's that then, the ebil gubment, the NWO, the illoominarty? So the checklist is, if it's idiotic it must be planted by god knows who, but if Mr Spam thinks it is ok, it's the truf?

I think the comparison in post #31 makes it pretty clear that there were two Pauls. There's also the issue of the different eye color (post #37).
Click to expand...

So stuff the fact that he is a left handed and very accomplished musician and has the most distinctive talking and singing voice on the planet, some asshole on youtube notices exposure settings on the camera have darkened his eyes?
 
David C said:
That's your way to dismiss concise and conclusive rebuttal is it?
Click to expand...
There was nothing conclusive there. I think the difference in eye color says it all.
https://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc52.html

The viewers can look at the comparison in post #31 and decide for themselves. It's pretty clear that they are two different people.

Here's another.
Paul to Faul - 1966 and 1967 Interviews more differences

Check out the comment section.
 
FatFreddy said:
It's pretty clear that they are two different people.
Click to expand...
IF Paul McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced, the "replacement" is a better musician than the "original" ever was.

So who cares?

What does anybody gain if this inane "conspiracy" is true?
 
FatFreddy said:
There was nothing conclusive there. I think the difference in eye color says it all.
https://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc52.html

The viewers can look at the comparison in post #31 and decide for themselves. It's pretty clear that they are two different people.

Here's another.
Paul to Faul - 1966 and 1967 Interviews more differences

Check out the comment section.
Click to expand...
i specially like how all the conspiracy videos have brain washing techniques in their intros

its soo honest and genuine !
 
billvon said:
There really is no conspiracy theory so stupid that you won't believe it. Fascinating!
Click to expand...
That's the thing with these people. Often it's a case of buy one, buy them all. The mindset of the conspiracy nut is interesting. I think there are some common features. One obvious one is distrust of certain other people, generally perceived "authorities". On the other hand, in seeming contradiction to that there is an almost puppylike trust in people who are perceived as co-seeking "truthers". Dig down a bit and I think you'll probably find some kind of personal rejection in the conspiracy theorist's life story, combined with a need to be accepted as part of a group.
 
Check this out. This is from 1968.

Paul McCartney & John Lennon 1968 Full Interview


Paul's eyes are brown like they were before 1966. His face doesn't seem to be long either. It's round like the original Paul's. Compare the eyes with the "Hey Jude" video. He supposedly disappeared in 1966. This is getting strange.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=paul+faul+comparison+&sp=mAEB


It seems like the old Paul came back for a while and left again.
 
FatFreddy said:
Check this out. This is from 1968.

Paul McCartney & John Lennon 1968 Full Interview

Paul's eyes are brown like they were before 1966. His face doesn't seem to be long either. It's round like the original Paul's. Compare the eyes with the "Hey Jude" video. He supposedly disappeared in 1966. This is getting strange. It seems like the old Paul came back for a while and left again.
Click to expand...

I suppose if it keeps him off the streets and away from normal people, FF bumbling around youtube and finding he is wrong is ok. It won't ever occur to him of course. It's just "strange".

Explaining that it is not strange and the problem was his ridiculous faith in idiotic conspiracy theories, well that one won't be taken onboard.
 
Paul McKartwheel is a reptilian shape shifter who has a fashion addiction problem
She invented paul as a cover story and then secrely toured the world in disguise dress shopping
She later changed her name to Stella which everyone knows means stars which is where reptilian shape shifters come from.
dead give a away
 
If the current (possibly fake) Paul McCartney dies, will there be a "Paul McCartney is really alive and living in Argentina" conspiracy theory?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top