Quantum QuackAnd this is why a circle can never be perfect as to be perfect the error factor MUST be zero.

Al I've ever said is a perfect circle or sphere is concept mind/intellect only. You bring zero error into the disscussion and that seems unnecesary to me and only tends to convolute a simple concept of a true/perfect circle.

Maybe you can explain what your going on with zero error is about in some way that seems relevant, then I will consider it more.

Zero is smaller than the infinitesimal.

Zero is a non-counting number i.e. zero is not a quantity so does not count. Infinity suggests a never ending counting ergo eternal counting of an infinite set of sequencial numbers.

and as yet I have NOT been refuted....as zero is not included and zero is a value

zero is a non-counting number ergo non-value would seem as if not more appropriate in definning zero.

and perfection of a circle, or sphere, requires an error factor of zero.....Understanding may change your view..

[/QUOTE]

I agree QQ, so if you think I misunderstood, then address those specific statements by you and me instead of trying to make gross generalizations of every conversation I've had with many diffferrent members, that, include varying degrees of troll and troll-like behaviour.

Ex. I see now perhaps what you meant when you used the words "more than infinite" you did not mean a quantity but something other than a numerical qunatity yet related/association and beyond number and quantity. I dunno yet. But you did not come back and state as such, so that is why I had to twice--- two sperate responses ---address your comment as being nonsensical.

So yes, if you clarify and specific clarify by addressing specific statments by you me or others, as they happen, then we have the best chance to find clarity and move on to other significant, relevant findings, concepts etc....

Again the minimal circle( 2D enclosure ) is a triangle and as the frequency of angles, the angular deficet(?) and lines of relationship increase, then we gain in circularity never attaing a true perfect circle but with concept of an infinite set of the above givens, eternally moving in the direciont of such perfect/true concept of mind/intellect.

Similar for the the minimal 3D sphere being the tetrahedron with 12 surface angles gaining in sphericity as the frequency of angles, agngular deficit and lines of relationship increase.

Pi = 1D

Pi^3( 31.00 62 7 ) appears to infer/imply a 3D( XYZ volumetric ) association with Pi.

Pi^4( 97.40 90 91 03 40 02 43 72 36 44 03 32 68 87 05 ) may translate into a time factor/vector association with Pi.

I dunno. Just a cosmic explorer making observations and speculating on what possible correlations may exist, from varied fields of physics, nature, mathematics in general and geometry specifically.

r6

r6