Not quite, M*W. Moral codes are agreed upon standards. Every human being has the capacity to be moral, or to hold to these codes. There can be no absolute or universal morality unless you believe that God enforces such standards, and you live by His standards. They are absolute because they are non-negotiable. If the Ten Commandments called for murder, we would be able to hold higher moral standards than God, but as it is, His standard require love for one another - and love for Him as the only God (meaning there can be no higher authority to enforce different standards).
What and2000x is saying is that pagan religions don't see it as black and white, but only different shades of grey. It's called relativistic morality (and it's not exlusive to ancient cultures, either).
The problem is the we live in a global, multi-cultural world, where one set of morals can be unacceptable to another. Take for instance the extremistic Jihad morality - where murder of an enemy can be justified - and how it clashes with Western culture (which despite the objections of many, grew from the Christian morality that any kind of murder is unacceptable).
Peace treaties only work if they address the moral issues. A cease-fire can only be effective if both sides are able to agree that shooting at the opposite side is wrong, despite their personal conviction that it is right. The "cease-fire standard" is only "right" as far as it is universal. Once one side breaks it, it automatically becomes "right" for the other side to retaliate... and you get what happened in Palestine.
What and2000x is saying is that pagan religions don't see it as black and white, but only different shades of grey. It's called relativistic morality (and it's not exlusive to ancient cultures, either).
The problem is the we live in a global, multi-cultural world, where one set of morals can be unacceptable to another. Take for instance the extremistic Jihad morality - where murder of an enemy can be justified - and how it clashes with Western culture (which despite the objections of many, grew from the Christian morality that any kind of murder is unacceptable).
Peace treaties only work if they address the moral issues. A cease-fire can only be effective if both sides are able to agree that shooting at the opposite side is wrong, despite their personal conviction that it is right. The "cease-fire standard" is only "right" as far as it is universal. Once one side breaks it, it automatically becomes "right" for the other side to retaliate... and you get what happened in Palestine.
Last edited: