Don't you understand that this video is making fun of the believers in the ludicrous, official, government-approved, 9/11 conspiracy theory?
Yeah I do understand that.
I watched your video "What in the World Are They Spraying?" I have seen some of this before but couldnt remember the names. Just so I could go back and review things that caught my eye, I wrote down clips that interested me.
3:50 - 4:50. Real. Makes sense the military would want to develop radar thwarting tools.
9:00 - 10:00 Interesting response to a question.
23:00 - appears to be legitimate test results.
29:30 - same as above
39:45 - when my grandpa got Alzheimers, aluminum was tossed around then. He worked in a foundry for many years. So far none of his kids show symptoms and they are all 60+.
40:41 - Interesting.
49:20 - I dont know how you explain aluminum in this kids system.
And thats where I quit making notes. So I did a quick search on a couple of the names. G. Edward Griffen. He is fringe material and I am skeptical of his ability to objectively examine his hypothesis.
Francis Mangels was a bit more interesting with his background. However as this link suggests, he also does not appear to be very objective:
https://www.metabunk.org/the-claims-of-francis-mangels-a-factual-examination.t154/
Post #6 gives a good visual example of possible mistakes.
Personally, I have never seen the contrail phenomena. I have seen some of the videos and its not my sky experience. I dont spend much time looking for it, but the plane exhaust I have seen falls under my normal expectations.
This spring I worked with a woman who believes vaccines triggered the severe autism in her child. She is not irrational in her views and immunized the kid born after this, and after the autism was diagnosed. She described to me the internal conflict when making that decision, going for, "the greater good". Her quarrel? It is an extreme burden on her family caring for this child. Its not the fact (for her) that the immunization caused the autism, its the abandonment of the system in providing for this damage that seems caused in the name of the greater good... and finally:
in 2011, an additional 47,500 children were newly paralysed in the year, over and above the standard 2/100,000 non-polio AFP that is generally accepted as the norm. (32-33). it is sad that, even after meticulous surveillance, this large excess in the incidence of paralysis was not investigated as a possible signal, nor was any effort made to try and study the mechanism for this spurt in non-polio AFP.
The above is related to the anti-vaccine reports of 47,000 kids... Its their source.
http://www.whale.to/v/polioaccuteflacid.pdf
Took me a while to find the above. But its there. And it makes me wonder about
That’s because D68 is related to the virus that causes polio,
http://www.webmd.com/children/news/20140929/paralysis-kids-enterovirus-d68
At the end of it all, I can only say, I dont know. It is true there are people in positions of power/policy that think there are too many people. It is true our government has implemented experiments on civilians without consent or knowledge in the not so distant past. And the term "for the greater good" is often used to justify less-than-desirable solutions to a perceived problem.
But if I go on a trip, I will check out immunizations required and suggested. I will get a measles booster (for example). But I wont get 9 different shots at once. Just in case.