Well, I don't profess to be one, whereas you do.
More importantly, I don't think anyone is an atheist in the true sense of the word.
I agree with the article.
OK OK.
But about my cat?
Well, I don't profess to be one, whereas you do.
More importantly, I don't think anyone is an atheist in the true sense of the word.
I agree with the article.
Just as you found DrT remark insulting I find talk of wife beating offensive.The same reason you haven't stopped beating your wife.
It wasn't tied to a specific creed, and it stands as a common reference to a type of fallacy in argument.Just as you found DrT remark insulting I find talk of wife beating offensive.
This casual resort to this line of arguement is in my view wrong.
Moreover it is such a tired approach we can find good reason not to employ such a tiresome tactic.
You can do better.
Alex
I know that but thanks for pointing it out because if I did not know you would have helped me learn something new.It wasn't tied to a specific creed, and it stands as a common reference to a type of fallacy in argument.
Its not that deep.If there was some online history of you having a specific history with domestic violence, then perhaps you may have some grounds for establishing extraneous grounds for insult.
The only thing that requires attention is whether sexual allegations against minors contravenes any standard admins wish to maintain.
The No True Scotsman fallacy.More importantly, I don't think anyone is an atheist in the true sense of the word.
There are no true men. Only professed ones. Yeah, we get it, Jan.There are no atheists. Only professed ones.