... a bit vague, I guess (?)And in situations where there no right and no wrong the viewpoints are ????
In most situations that matter, there is right and wrong.
... a bit vague, I guess (?)And in situations where there no right and no wrong the viewpoints are ????
I think the colour blue is better than the colour yellow... a bit vague, I guess (?)
In most situations that matter, there is right and wrong.
Does that matter?I think the colour blue is better than the colour yellow
CouldDoes that matter?
You're saying that a colour blind person might perceive the wrong colour (or no colour, where there should be colour). This would be an example of where there is a right and wrong answer, would it not?Could
I'm colour blind defective safe
Others only see shades of grey. They would ñeed to be considered and consulted about colour schemes used in some situations
You're saying that a colour blind person might perceive the wrong colour (or no colour, where there should be colour). This would be an example of where there is a right and wrong answer, would it not?
I think the colour blue is better than the colour yellow
It doesn't, but if a lot of people are confused, there may be a better idea.It sure can. But
1. It's an ever-evolving, ever-improving world. We adapt in a thousand ways every day.
2. Your desire to not be confused does not compel others to kow-tow.
I think James R coined the perfect term for the problem: conservative fogeyism.It doesn't, but if a lot of people are confused, there may be a better idea.
Remind me why we need titles such as Mr. and Mrs. in this day and age?My daughter told me Mx is gender neutral for Ms and Mr.
Sounds better than "Ouy you"Remind me why we need titles such as Mr. and Mrs. in this day and age?
Good luck trying to use politics to modify language.Remind me why we need titles such as Mr. and Mrs. in this day and age?
It doesn't so much change as it just falls by the wayside as the oldguard dies off.Good luck trying to use politics to modify language.
John, formerly known as "he" is the correct protocol I think.Out of curiosity, is there any language that has a gender neutral singular pronoun for people?
There is one. It's 'they'.All I would like to see a sensible singular pronoun replacing his/her...
WTF?John, formerly known as "he" is the correct protocol I think.
Finnish has "Hän" , which is used instead of he or she. "He" and "Ne" both mean they(pl), but "he" is used in reference to people and "ne" for otherwise. ( That is formally. In common usage, "Ne" will be used for both.)Out of curiosity, is there any language that has a gender neutral singular pronoun for people?
When referring to one person usually "he" or "she" is used. To avoid gender definition, "they" is being used. I'm used to "they" as a plural. Is there a gender neutral word possible?
I was unaware of this movement. I will look into it.These are the "therians", who are a sub-category of "otherkin".
The latter embraces the whole spectrum of "abhumanism" (the trend away from human status -- at least currently only in terms of personal thoughts). From individuals who consider themselves to be elves, vampires, etc trapped in human bodies to those with the cognitive orientations of space aliens and even non-conscious furniture like chairs (the extreme fringe).
I'm not sure which camp this is directed at. Clarify?But that said, let us all give thanks and hail the [non-deceptive, devoid of motivated reasoning] altruism of our beloved systemic-oppression-conspiracy theorists. We humbly genuflect to your worthy dicta, and a noble lineage that traces meanderingly back to the New Left transition, Uncle Karl's socioeconomic analysis, the Jacobin Club of the French Revolution, and certain 18th-century French philosophers (who were unsurprisingly either members of or sycophants of the aristocratic elite).
I was unaware of this movement. I will look into it.
1. My first, unprocessed blush is that it has a number of hurdles to jump through first. The best analogy is that of individuals who claim to have formed their own religion and demand their own holidays. It is not enough to simply claim you are X and expect others to make concessions you just made up. The non-binary community has a storied history, a large contingent and have certainly grown to the point where it is a significant body. Have any elves banded into a community? Have they historically suffered oppression over the centuries/millennia?
2. More to-the-point though - it's kind of a diversion from the thread topic, is it not? Do we actually have any human-centric pronouns that are a necessary component of comprehensible communication (as he and she are)?
3. Surely the lowest hurdle for getting to call oneselves a community is to - at the very least - have a Wiki entry! Neither Therian nor Ad-humanism has risen to that level.