you must have an excellent grasp of grammar, all those formal business letters you write.Speaking proper English is a mark of respect for the person you're addressing, you tool.
But great thread title. Brought a smile to my face.
you must have an excellent grasp of grammar, all those formal business letters you write.Speaking proper English is a mark of respect for the person you're addressing, you tool.
But great thread title. Brought a smile to my face.
it's satan's tool I'm telling you.Who is a subjective pronoun.
Whom is an objective pronoun.
Who gave the finger to whom?
"Who" is the subject of the sentence (the subject is that which is performing the action).
"Whom" is the object of the sentence (the object is that which the action is directed toward).
It gets a little more complicated, but that's the jist of it.
Now my turn for a question.
"A" or "An".
"An" is supposed to be used before a vowel sound.
That is an elephant.
"A" is supposed to be used before a consonant sound.
That is a radio.
Regardless of the first letter, "An" is supposed to be used before a vowel sound.
It was an honorary degree.
So, why is "That is an historical fact." correct? While "That is a hippopotamus." also correct?
Excellent!
Thanks, Raven, I appreciate the lesson and the info.
Why do people have to anally demand correct grammar every fricking where they stick their nose?
Who is a subjective pronoun.
Whom is an objective pronoun.
Who gave the finger to whom?
"Who" is the subject of the sentence (the subject is that which is performing the action).
"Whom" is the object of the sentence (the object is that which the action is directed toward).
It gets a little more complicated, but that's the jist of it.
Now my turn for a question.
"A" or "An".
"An" is supposed to be used before a vowel sound.
That is an elephant.
"A" is supposed to be used before a consonant sound.
That is a radio.
Regardless of the first letter, "An" is supposed to be used before a vowel sound.
It was an honorary degree.
So, why is "That is an historical fact." correct? While "That is a hippopotamus." also correct?
the shirt, or the bimbo in the shirt?
the shirt, or the bimbo in the shirt?
I thought you have to base it on the letter - sound being irrelevant!
A honorary degree - sounds funny
An honorary degree - flows
So if it sounds right you stick ‘an’ b4 it?
Both.
Even my fiance who holds a degree in English can't give me an answer.
However, I suppose it's because language started out spoken and we had rules for that. To remain consistant, we write like we speak.
One tricky case comes up from time to time: is it "a historic occasion" or "an historic occasion"? Some speakers favor the latter — more British than American, but you'll find them in both places — using an on longish words (three or more syllables) beginning with H, where the first syllable isn't accented. They'd say, for instance, "a hístory textbook" but "an históric event." (Likewise "a hábit" but "an habítual offender," "a hýpothetical question" but "an hypóthesis.") Still, most guides prefer a before any H that's sounded: "a historic occasion," "a hysterical joke," "a habitual offender" — but "an honor" and "an hour" because those H's aren't sounded. [Entry revised 21 April 2006.]
So people WOULD pronounce history and istorical?History is pronounced by some with an /h/ and by others without an /h/. And often both ways by the same people, in different contexts. And so is historical. But the -ic(al) suffix is a stress-shifter; when it's added to a root the stress moves rightward one syllable (hístory vs históric, autómata vs automátic, térrify vs terrífic, etc). That in turn means the first syllable becomes unstressed, and in unstressed syllables in English there's a much higher likelihood of dropping /h/.
Nope, it is the sound, not the letter.
"Honorary" starts with the same "o" vowel sound as "on", therefore it is "an honorary".
This still doesn't explain why "an historical fact" is correct, unless you speak with an English cockneyed accent and pronounce it "istorical", but then "an History lesson" would be correct, but it is not.
I've been trying to get this question answered for years.
Even my fiance who holds a degree in English can't give me an answer.
If you could ever find an answer, it would solve one of the many things that plague me. I've always felt uncomfortable using "an" for written word that starts out sounding like a vowel. "An honest man" sounds right, but written it seems to make more sense writing it as "a honest man." Maybe it's because I am a visual reader and I don't sound out words in my head when I read.
However, I suppose it's because language started out spoken and we had rules for that. To remain consistant, we write like we speak.
Thanks for explaining why the lyrics as written feel wrong. And that's why grammar is important (he says, starting his sentence with 'And'). It's because, if you have a basic understanding of grammar (mine's average), and a love of language, some constructions just feel out of place. They jump out at you and hit you in the head. The resulting pain is almost physical.Were is for untrue hypotheticals for use with the verb "to be".
If I were rich.
If she were speeding.
If Dan were here we would know what to do.
Was is past tense of am.
I was rich.
She was speeding.
Dan wasn't there, so they didn't know what to do.