Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

Thanks for the insight Dinosaur but I was merely using that as a example of a appeal to authority fallacy, it did not need to be true or not.
 
Neuromancer: My last post was intended to be for informational purposes only. No intent to disagree with your post about authority.

While an authority can be wrong or misleading, life is short. If we tried to work out everything for ourselves, there would not be much time left for smelling the roses. Relying on an authority is often a convenient shortcut.
 
but that authority must display evidence and proof for their claims, I'm not going to board the Beagle and search the Galapagos like Darwin, but his proof and evidence is so clear, logical and obvious, that I will believe in evolution based only on vague personal observations and scientific literature.
 
But I would not feel so all alone....
Everybody must get stoned!! :m:

Seriously... sometimes this thread makes me want to experiment with drugs.
 
LOL I'm not really a drug user... the closest I've come is Adderol, Retaline, Tofarnill, and misc. other ADHD drugs. But sometimes, just SOMETIMES I wish I could get a stronger dose of my stuff without worrying about heart attacks, ceasures, ect
 
Re: dixon located

Originally posted by emarald
http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/~dixon/PaulDixonCV.html

check the section on Community service and the part about the 3 nobel for physics nominations. Can this be verified?

Have a read of The FAQ on nominating people for Nobel prizes. Importantly, the bit about nominators must not make public the names of the nominees nor inform nominees privately of the proposals. And The names of the nominees are classified as confidential information for at least fifty years.

So the Nobel committee will not divulge nominees for 50 years. But nor should the nominator tell the nominee. The corollary of this is left to the reader. Maybe the Nobel committee would be interested in Paul's CV?
 
Hey, maybe this is all a big phsychology experiment for him? SInce he seems ot be a phsychologist after all.
 
It has been over a month since the last post by Paul.

Did he die, give up, go on vacation, get picked up by men in white jackets, or did his computer quit?
 
Are we trying to be the world's longest running thread? If it is count me in. We can keep going for the next ten years. All you have to do is copy one of Dixon's previous posting once in a while - no one will no the difference (Because there are not any!!!)
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

The current energy levels at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory have been increased from 1.2 TeV to 33 TeV (trillion electron volts) for the the Tevatron 2 trials scheduled for this March or April 2001.
Please check the Luminoisty Webpage at Fermilab to verify this enormous increase.

Clearly, this is enough energy to access those energies resident in de Sitter space thus produing a supernova. This is termed a Type Ia supernova and is used as a standard candle for distance estimates in observational astonomy.

Even though research is often risky this is an unacceptable risk since supernova production will destroy everthing out to a perimeter of some 50 light years.

Please contact me at for further information. Go to: ( Paul Dixon Supernova) on Google.com or (Paul W. Dixon supernova) as well to check various webpages on this topic.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATON AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.

The Tevatron at Fermilab has again initated the collisional interactions between matter and anti-matter in the ring. We may quote from H. G. Wells in this connection,

"Human history becomes more and more a race
between education and catastrophe."

So far, there has been no scientific rejoinder to the position derived from relativistic cosmology that these energies as they are increased will inevitably cause a transition towards de Sitter space, thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova. The energies in de Sitter space, as is well-known, are great enough to produce this tragic result.

All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

WISHING EVERYONE A VERY MERRY CHRISTMAS &

ALL BEST WISHES FOR THE NEW YEAR !!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Originally posted by kmguru
Are we trying to be the world's longest running thread? If it is count me in. We can keep going for the next ten years.
10 years, or until the world blows up ;)
 
What good are global markets and control?
Are we really about WMD's and oil?
Why must my son and daughter
be sent to die?
Is faith and patriotism our only good?
Are we doing what we should?
And if not, Why?


You can ask a question
and receive the answer
but without understanding
you've gone nowhere at all.
Believing you know
could be a lie but thats OK.
We don't walk before we crawl.


Man discovered fire
and thats where we are with oil.
Even nuclear energy
is just a way of boiling water.
Now imagine a clean energy
from an unknown source
that goes much farther.


Think of it as simple as
borrowing from Peter to pay Paul.
But "Peter" is in an unseen dimension.
On the surface its a perfect solution.
When we conducted nuclear tests
we made pin holes between worlds.
Could we now spread an ultimate pollution?


We all believe in an unseen universe
one way or another.
Astronomers envision dark matter
Cosmologists, a parrallel brane.
Physicists, eleven dimensions.
Even religious myths
are romanticly the same.


So until we have better eyes to see
we best burn our oil
because the Peters on the other side
could cosmicly become very very angry
should we endanger them
without knowledge or care.
Blindly lighting a fuse is insanity.


Free energy is like a free lunch
it still comes from somewhere.
It worries me that we may plunge ahead
without knowing anything about the where.
Without caring what differentials we create.
Perhaps there are simple safeguards
but as always we seem to proceed on a dare.


So the energy machine we call trinity
and the overlord device remain on ice.
We still secretly seek
to control the singularity.
"Peter" demands inspections.
Since he can see through time, he hopes
to correct our ignorant peculiarities.


Perhaps in time the harm we will cause may be found
"Peter" must decide if we're fit to stay around.
In cosmic proportions another war looms
yet again for energy and power.
But this time worlds will end
and the outcome will portend
who will die and who will flower.


We are all children
who call ourselves people.
The truth may be stranger than fiction
but even our lies are not that simple.
Where there is no room for compassion
there is excommunication.
We desperately need collaboration.


Call me a traitor if you must, but
Peter, if you can hear me,
the lab is somewhere in Long Island.
It could produce a super nova.
I hope you know more of such things.
For both our sakes we need your help
before everything is over.



(Preface to a sci fi thriller.)
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

All thanks to everyone for your contributions to this thread and for your valiant attempts to halt this tragic progression to our doom. Our families call out for your for immediate action in contacting the media.

The energetics at Fermilab are now set to exceed 51.79E30 luminosity at some 978.09 GeV - which is the new record. There has thus been an increment of some 5 orders of magnitude (x 10) since the beginning of Run II at Fermilab. Your continued efforts to halt this imprudent action are are all that keeps us from the generation of
a Type Ia supernova in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed. With each increment in energetics, the probability of forming a transition toward de Sitter space is increased.

All the children will thank you for your prompts actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!

ALL BEST WISHES FOR THE NEW YEAR!!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
wow, this is hands down the most bizarre thread I've seen in months (certainly in this area anyway). In reading Dr.Pauls posts its almost like someone developed a very advanced software program that simulates human responses but still has that off-kilter mechanical or alien quality about it. Either that or the feeling of an up and coming cult leader, Dr.Pauls statements are almost creepy in their antiseptic politeness and repetitive openings and closings. Not to mention the way very straight questions or requests for detail are not only, not addressed but sidestepped entirely. This thread is like a slow motion car accident, as tortuous and painful as it is I just can't stop watching.
 
Last edited:
Look on the bright side! If a supernova happens, this threat will be annihilated, all the children will be thankfull and God have shown mercy on our souls.

Pump up the luminosity! :D :eek: :D
 
Last edited:
Paul W. Dixon said:
The energetics at Fermilab are now set to exceed 51.79E30 luminosity at some 978.09 GeV - which is the new record. There has thus been an increment of some 5 orders of magnitude (x 10) since the beginning of Run II at Fermilab. Your continued efforts to halt this imprudent action are are all that keeps us from the generation of
a Type Ia supernova in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed. With each increment in energetics, the probability of forming a transition toward de Sitter space is increased.
Say now the chance to go nova is 99%; the chance to go nova then should be 5 order of mangitude less. What was that? 0.00099%?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top