Quote an example of me doing this and I'll officially apologize.Indeed, you have no problem describing yourself in such rosy terms when you need such as a premise to denounce others. Within a few posts, though, you'll be back to regurgitating dated hard-line Marxist Revolutionary rhetoric. You aren't fooling anyone.
It's fine by me if they want to vote for Assad in free and fair democratic elections. I do not think their preferences would prevail in such a situation. I don't propose disenfranchizing any Syrians, unlike the Assad supporters who insist upon dictating the fate of the entire nation, through the use of violence.
Yes, they are disenfranchizing the Sunnis. I'm glad. They tend to support Islamic extremists. Minority protection > majority rule.
One of those groups has legitimate, defensible interests and one of those groups has illegitimate, indefensible "interests."
It's trivially true that all political conflicts occur between groups with their own particular interests. That doesn't magically erase morality from the issue. Not all "interests" are morally equal.
And of course, you and the USA get to define which is which and what is what.
The "material reality" is that the Assad dynasty is a destructive force that continues to pervert and undermine Syria for its own narrow, illegitimate benefit.
That's probably true. I'd be hard pressed to find a country where this didn't apply to the government, though.