The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Then why does it have a skull-shaped housing?

[GE Hammond MS physics]
... Why is there such a thing as QUADRANTANOPIA ?

3-0f6a6b4927.jpg
 
[GE Hammond MS physics]
... Why is there such a thing as QUADRANTANOPIA ?

3-0f6a6b4927.jpg

Link below will answer

Extract

Visual field defects—hemianopsia and quadrantanopsia
Visual field loss may indicate damage that is prechiasmic, at the optic chiasm, postchiasmic, in the visual radiations of the thalamus, or in the visual cortex. The resultant visual field loss is characteristic (even diagnostic) in each case.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/quadrantanopia

Quadrantanopsia is DIAGNOSTIC of an OCCURRENCE within the brain

Nothing connected with
How does it cause God? Well let me show you:
upload_2022-3-16_10-15-10-jpeg.4657

... The above "cubic model of the brain" is entirely accurate, the 3 orthogonal (Cartesian) cleavages of the brain causing this cubic structure are known as the "Central, Rolandic, and Transverse " fissures of the brain. This is a "cubic" brain structure, and it is well known that a "cube" has exactly 13-symmetric rotational symmetry axes, and these are shown in the diagram to the right

cause(ing) God or being a "cubic model of the brain"

That (Go heckle someone else) lasted long :)

But I did not promise

:)
 
[GE Hammond MS physics]
... Why is there such a thing as QUADRANTANOPIA ?

3-0f6a6b4927.jpg

[GE Hammond MS physics]
PS: – By the way, that illustration is from my 1994 peer-reviewed publication:

https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray

... The point is, that even though the brain is squash around in deformed of shape, it still can produce an exact, precise and sharp geometric function. And this is why I claim that the cubic structure of the brain can produce "13 sharp and precise" personality types " (eigenvectors) in modern psychometry factor analysis.

George
 
At least we now know you are claiming and have not proven your what ever it is / was / hope it is ramblings

By the way, that illustration is from my 1994 peer-reviewed publication:
By the way no-one cares if that illustration is from my 1994 peer-reviewed publication or it is a copy of a Mr Squiggle illustration

:)
 
Last edited:
[GE Hammond MS physics]
PS: – By the way, that illustration is from my 1994 peer-reviewed publication:

https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray

... The point is, that even though the brain is squash around in deformed of shape, it still can produce an exact, precise and sharp geometric function. And this is why I claim that the cubic structure of the brain can produce "13 sharp and precise" personality types " (eigenvectors) in modern psychometry factor analysis.

George

[GE Hammond MS physics]
... And by the way, the fact that Quadrantanopia demonstrates that a squished around deformed "cubic brain" can cause a precise, geometric optical pattern in the visual system, is one of the things that convinces me that the squished around in deformed "cubic brain" causes the following precise, geometric structure of the psychometry "Personality Types" (Factor Analytic Eigenvectors) shown below:
upload_2022-3-18_2-2-48.jpeg
QED – George
 
Last edited:
How many other things are there and can you enumerate them please?

:)

[GE Hammond MS physics]
... Sure no problem. There are 7 sub- diagrams shown below:

upload_2022-3-18_7-49-37.jpeg

And notice that there are the names of 35 peer published academic researchers who have discovered and measured these models to: 2 decimal point accuracy.
''' That's a hellava lot of peer published scientific evidence supporting my theory !

George
 
You do understand that the blackened areas are marked in such a manner ONLY TO DEMONSTRATE THE REGION?

Not as a depiction of a real life occurrence

I'm gone- ya ya again

:)
[GE Hammond MS physics]
.... It looks pretty precise to me:


300px-Right_superior_quadrantanopia.png


220px-Paris_as_seen_with_left_homonymous_hemianopsia.png


Images from:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrantanopia

George
You do understand that the blackened areas are marked in such a manner ONLY TO DEMONSTRATE THE REGION?

Not as a depiction of a real life occurrence

I'm gone- ya ya again

:)
[

[GE Hammond MS physics]
... Your splitting hairs and covering it with spam just to hear yourself talk!
The diagram shown in Post #463-e and the lower diagram shown in post #469 are widely in fact universally known as accurate "artistic medical representations" of what Quadrantanopia actually looks like. It is known to be quite accurately a precise quadrature which of course is why it is called quadrantanopia for chrissakes!
... Bear in mind that there is no way to take a photograph of what a person actually sees, doncha know. This is why Art exists!
.
George
 
So to sum it all up, we have discovered that the gods are personality types and there are 13 of them. We have discovered that the top final eigenvector in all of psychology is a "curvature of subjective reality" and is known historically as the God of the Bible. And finally, modern quantum biology indicates that there is at least a 33% chance that the description of life after death in the Bible is scientifically true.

(48) The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy | George E Hammond - Academia.edu
George,
If I understand this excerpt from your thesis correctly, you are indicating that this entire concept is the anthropomorphic interpretation from a subjective human psychological perspective.

IOW, God is an invention of the human mind.

I can agree with that 100%. But it does not objectively prove the actual existence of a God as independent from human thought, no?

If human mathematics are symbolic descriptions of universal values and relational (mathematical) functions, then the concept of a God is just a subjective "anthropmorphic interpretation", which assumes the existence of an intelligent agency, i.e. the Universe is the result of "Intelligent Design" rather than a result of "Evolution via Natural Selection" as proposed by Lee Smolin.

Let's open this door and watch this compelling video, shall we?
Do Black Holes Create New Universes? - YouTube
 
Last edited:
That doesn't answer the question. You said in message #458 that, "... The BRAIN is a quadrature, (cube) ". Of course, we know it isn't.
Is it necessarily a cube?

quadran.gif
th


quadrant 2
Quadrant Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster

The term quadrature of the circle is sometimes used to mean the same thing as squaring the circle, but it may also refer to approximate or numerical methods for finding the area of a circle.
Squaring the circle - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Is it necessarily a cube?
He said it was. If he had stopped at "quadrature", I would have let it go.

But since he mentioned a "cube", which is a very specific shape, I suspect he doesn't know what he's talking about.
 
He said it was. If he had stopped at "quadrature", I would have let it go.

But since he mentioned a "cube", which is a very specific shape, I suspect he doesn't know what he's talking about.
OK, that's reasonable.

I do believe he knows what he is talking about. I just think he is approaching this from the wrong perspective, i.e. subjectively. Statements like : "is one of the things that convinces me that the squished around in deformed "cubic brain" causes the following precise, geometric structure of the psychometry "Personality Types" (Factor Analytic Eigenvectors) shown below:
upload_2022-3-18_2-2-48-jpeg.4664


seems to me like "putting the cart before the horse" with an assumption of a universe that has intelligent personalities (eigenvectors), rather than a stochastically deterministic universe, where living organisms exhibit mathematically measurable "ego-driven" personalities.

I get the impression that George has drawn the conclusion that the Universe is intelligently mathematical because humans are intelligently mathematical, rather than that universal mathematics do not need to be intelligent at all, but only logical.

I see a world of difference in those analogies.

This is why I posted that PBS video about a multiverse where "universal evolution via natural selection" has produced universes suitable for the emergence of life rather than an intelligently designed universe suitable for the emergence of life.

IOW, in an eternally recycling multiverse, there are evolved "species of universes", some of which are suitable for the emergence of life. I like that concept very much.

It also fits the concept of a single toroid shaped universe that keeps recycling itself and evolving with each cyclical regeneration.

Science knows about evolution via natural selection. It is one of the triumphs of Science.
 
Last edited:
He said it was. If he had stopped at "quadrature", I would have let it go.

But since he mentioned a "cube", which is a very specific shape, I suspect he doesn't know what he's talking about.

[GE Hammond MS physics]
... Slideshowbob said:
"Hammond said: "Why is there such a thing as QUADRANTANOPIA ?
That doesn't answer the question. You said in message #458 that, "... The BRAIN is a quadrature, (cube) ". Of course, we know it isn't.

[GE Hammond MS physics]
... Who is "we"?
Let me tell you something, the word "quadrature" is a 17th century mathematical term however it has instant "theological meaning", just as the common street expression "the guy is a square" has instant theological (psychological) meaning.
... I picked up the word "quadrature" from Isaac Newton who used the word in a personal correspondence with Edmund Haley the astronomer. Haley had asked Newton if he had "made any headway on a theory of gravity" and Newton answered him by saying "I have reduced the problem to quadrature", meaning that he had reduced it to a mathematical integration problem.
... This use of the word "quadrature" immediately told me that Newton was talking over Haley's head since use of the word "quadrature" is an immediate reference to psychology and the theory of God which was probably beyond Haley's education! '
... So we are indebted to the great Isaac Newton himself for the use of the word "quadrature" in scientific discussion. And it does relate to a "square" since Isaac Newton himself invented "mathematical integration" which involves taking infinitesimal squares (rectangles) and summing them up to integrate the area under a curve.

George
 
He said it was. If he had stopped at "quadrature", I would have let it go.

But since he mentioned a "cube", which is a very specific shape, I suspect he doesn't know what he's talking about.
In George's explanation reply George is able to leap Grand Canyon chasms of connections

:)
 
George,
If I understand this excerpt from your thesis correctly, you are indicating that this entire concept is the anthropomorphic interpretation from a subjective human psychological perspective.

IOW, God is an invention of the human mind.

I can agree with that 100%. But it does not objectively prove the actual existence of a God as independent from human thought, no?

[GE Hammond MS physics]
NO, you are incorrect that:
_____"IOW, God is an invention of the human mind."
... The reason you are incorrect is because God is a "physical fact" of the human brain, and NOT an "invention" of the human mind.

... Look, the universe (Nature) has long been proven to be "scientifically logical" and because mathematics is simply "symbolic logic" therefore the universe (Nature) can be as you propose, "be entirely described by mathematics". No problem!
... The thing that is missing in your theory is the (newly discovered scientific fact by Hammond), that there is a real God and that it can be concisely described by mathematics as an "Einsteinian curvature of subjective reality". So your mathematical description of the universe is incomplete without the incorporation of the fact that there actually is a "real God".
... Now avoiding "Philawsephy" discussion completely, let me mention the every day practical scientific (indeed mathematical) facts about this so-called "real God".
As you know a half grown person (a 9-year-old child) has half the size, and half the mental speed (perceptual speed) as an 18-year-old fully grown adult. There is no arguing that that fact has been measured by thousands of researchers for hundreds of years. Okay, and the 2nd fact is that no one on earth ever reaches "full growth" in fact the world population average is about 85% of full growth. This means that the size and speed of the world as the average human being sees it appears to be 15% larger and 15% faster than it really is. And by the way if the world average is 15%, there are plenty of people who are 20 or 30% growth stunted!
... This makes the world look and feel far more terrifying and frightening than a really actually is, and the world population is affected by this. And finally, this phenomenon is historically and universally known as the phenomenon of "God".
... So in practical daily scientific terms, this phenomenon is of overwhelming scientific and practical significance! And as I have pointed out, there is now a complete scientific explanation (indeed proof) that this is all true, and that there actually is a real God.
... So I simply suggest that your "mathematical universe" is missing a major scientific and indeed mathematical phenomenon: namely God !

George
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top