Can you draw a flamingo? Have you ever drawn a flamingo? How then do you know that you can draw a flamingo?
Am I claiming I can? No. You're claiming to have a theory of
everything. I'm asking you to show your claims can at least match what current understanding we have. It's an entirely relevant request.
If you think science is wrong and should be overturned you're going to have to demonstrate so. If you think your work deserves to replace it then you're going to have to show your work is worth looking at. If your work can't meet even the simplest requirement then why should anyone give you the time of day?
Science has looked at the Earth, calculated the Earth, compared it to Mercury, and slapped itself on the back.
You clearly don't even know what the precession of Mercury pertains to.
A Theory Of Everything which I have not applied, and you have not managed to come up with.
I've contributed more to science than you ever will.
Provide me with a sperm sample to prove you can create a child.
Am I claiming to be capable of procreation?
You started a thread with a big claim, I'm asking you to substantiate it. Where I make claims about my work I'm happy to demonstrate my understanding. If you'd like we can go to the physics and maths forum and have a discussion on it, assuming you accept a few ground rules before hand (which I'll go into if you're interested).
If you think my question about Mercury is too specific then please provide
any evidence you have a
working model of
anything. My point is that you haven't provided
anything.
Science controls science else never get anywhere in science.
Yes, yes, its a massive conspiracy....
That would make an interesting Neural Network.
Looks like you don't know what a neural network is either. Yet another little delusion you have.
A/ You are wrong, science blocks facts.
B/ You don't represent science.
C/ Science loves maths, not facts.
D/ Science loves science facts, not factual reality.
E/ I am science, but would hate to admit it.
What makes you think you know more about science or represent science more than others in this thread? You admit you don't do it and don't want to do it. You admit you can't do physics or mathematics. You admit you have no experience or qualifications in it or anything related. You've previously asked on this forum how to go about getting paid to do science research.
I'm paid to do it, thanks to my experience, understanding and previous achievements. That's how you get places in science or in life in general. Hard work, try it some time.
So please, how is it your
opinion about something you have no experience or information on is supposedly more relevant/viable/correct than anyone else's?