Buffalo Roam
Registered Senior Member
Tell me the logic of nuking a city with an atom bomb. I've always wondered how those guys lived with themselves.
It ended the killing.
Tell me the logic of nuking a city with an atom bomb. I've always wondered how those guys lived with themselves.
So, according to you, a person who flies a couple of planes into a couple of skyscrapers acquires a taste for it? hmm, interesting.
Thats consequence, and unforseen. What I'm asking about is the initial initiative. I am going to an army recruitment center to sign up. I know at some point this will involve me with gun ot trigger button in hand and dead person at another. I choose to do this. Why?
Its very rare to find an armed citizen in India. Even most criminals prefer knives. I personally do not know even a single person in my circle who owns a gun. I think it is the culture. We associate nonviolence with satyagraha and independence, violence with partition and destruction.
No, actually that is when it is the most pleasurable.
So do all soldiers hunt for pleasure? Is it a blood lust kind of thing?
So, according to you, a person who flies a couple of planes into a couple of skyscrapers acquires a taste for it? hmm, interesting
So what makes them different from soldiers who bomb cities at 40,000 feet? What makes one right and the other wrong?
You have no idea what a liberal is do you?
No it is not. It is universally considered never justified to take another human life no matter what the circumstance. That's basic ethics.It is universally considered justifiable when the other person is trying to kill you.
Who is right or wrong is not the topic in question, is it?
Sure, someone who favors extreme individual liberty without respects to cultural conformity.
It is actually, what gives one or the other a greater right to kill?