Yes, poor people in general are much more prone to crime and profiled accordingly. Simply accepting the crime statistics, as a tool to fight crime, is the responsible and proactive thing to do. Ignoring the statistics is denying reality. Probable cause means it is not a violation of liberties.
According to the FBI statistics (here), blacks commit a larger percentage of every crime compared to their percentage of the population, except driving under the influence. Yes, that includes white-collar crimes, like embezzling and fraud. So again, even a well-dressed black person is more likely to have committed a crime.
As I already pointed out, you're referring to statistics based on arrest rates and not on reliable, unbiased estimates of actual underlying crime rates. I believe I previously referred you to a source which estimates comparable illegal drug possession rates between white and black people, with black people 3x more likely to be caught and convicted for it. And for the record, this is you justifying that people should be stopped and searched by the police more often if they're black, regardless of how they're dressed.
Ignoring such statistics is affirmative action for criminals, which is itself prejudicial.
No, it's granting each human being equal treatment as individuals judged purely on the merits of their own individual actions. We don't condemn German children just because their tribe recently massacred tens of millions in the name of greed and pride.
Demanding that your good child and your bad child face the same degree of scrutiny and suspicion will tend to make the good child bad, as there is no benefit from their better behavior. And refusing to scrutinize the bad child will embolden its bad behavior, which in the case of blacks, is negatively felt throughout their communities. It's that danger in black communities that harm the opportunities of blacks, by driving out good jobs, and pressuring adolescents to join gangs for safety.
You can't justify treating a black person like a "bad child" until they've actually done something bad. You're only a few steps away from justifying outright slavery or deprivation of civil rights, so I can't see why you don't just come out of the closet and go for the full 100 yard dash, no one will think any worse of you for it. In any case, refraining from keeping a bad child tied to a tree out in the backyard won't encourage bad behaviour in the good child, because they will see that sometimes the bad child gets caught when misbehaving, and the punishment they receive when they're caught is a sufficient deterrent for the other.
Trump and Floyd are US issues, where Canadian law is irrelevant.
You have my condolences for your tragic misfortune.
If I were a Canadian criminal, I'd always drive around with a broken tail light. Then, according to you, I could effectively get away with anything else illegal I might be doing, whether that's drug or gun smuggling, human trafficking, etc..
No, because then you'd get caught acting like an idiot and searched under reasonable grounds accordingly, broken tail light notwithstanding.