kingiyk:
Are you satisfied with the explanation I have given you?
What is completely missing from your "work" is any compelling reason for why anybody would want to connect properties of the number 3 to your God or to your religious beliefs.
There is nothing compelling in your claims. There is no meaningful link between the ideas.
Why are you ignoring the number 12, kingiyk? Why?!
I have just shown you that there's nothing miraculous about your "digital roots". It's just how numbers work.I did come to this amazing platform in good faith. I simply find it troubling that none here has acknowledged the coincidences revealed in the work. Not a single one. A review should be honest. I expected an explanation for the coincidences and why they prove consistent.
Are you satisfied with the explanation I have given you?
There have been no positive reviews.Let us assume the work is comprised of positive and negative reviews.
All you are doing is drawing random connections between thoughts. You like the number 3, and you've found a mathematical fact about the number 3.It would be encouraging to discuss the positives for once.
What is completely missing from your "work" is any compelling reason for why anybody would want to connect properties of the number 3 to your God or to your religious beliefs.
There is nothing compelling in your claims. There is no meaningful link between the ideas.
Why have you not addressed DaveC's objection that a clock has four numbers at the compass points: 3, 6, 9 and 12, and not three numbers? A compass has north, south, east and west, not just east, west and south.The idea of fixing the Cross into a time clock and it corresponding with 369 and Romans 5:6, surely, has to be a topic to ponder upon, and I would be much invested in doing that.
Why are you ignoring the number 12, kingiyk? Why?!