kx000
Valued Senior Member
I fail to see why identical things aren't allowed to exist?
It still might cause rebirth, however.
I fail to see why identical things aren't allowed to exist?
What exactly do you mean by rebirth?It still might cause rebirth, however.
What exactly do you mean by rebirth?
So, your argument is that two the same things aren't allowed to exist, because that would cause two the same things to exist? That's circular reasoning.The same thing over again.
How is it possible I could be reborn? "I" have the experiences (both mental and physical) of a man more than a half century old.The same thing over again.
So, your argument is that two the same things aren't allowed to exist, because that would cause two the same things to exist? That's circular reasoning.
How is it possible I could be reborn?
Even if my DNA occurred exactly the same somewhere/when else in the universe, it can't be me.
Why can't it be you?
No two snowflakes are the same (I know, I checked)
The number of "things" in the Universe is as close to infinite as you can get and the Universe is really really big
No two things can be the same simply because they are constructed from different atoms
![]()
Why? And what does this have to do with similar things in general being allowed or not?There can only be one Love.
You've just answered your own question: if there are only a finite number of possible objects, and there are an infinite number of object, some will necessarily have to be the same.I do not understand why they would be reborn only that the possibility is there because things are finite, like shapes, colors, or directions.
That's only true if there are also only a finite number of interactions possible between objects.The circle goes round as the same thing forever like the same thing occurring forever.
Why? And what does this have to do with similar things in general being allowed or not?
There's only a finite amount of apples on Earth. And if you're talking about possible apples: please provide proof that there are infinite possible different apples.They wouldn't just be similar. Apple's are infinite,
Are they? Please provide proof.but types of fruits are finite.
Why? And what does this have to do with similar things in general being allowed or not?
There's only a finite amount of apples on Earth. And if you're talking about possible apples: please provide proof that there are infinite possible different apples.
Are they? Please provide proof.
And this still doesn't prove that there's only one "Love", or what that has to do with similar things in general being allowed or not.
Why would we be able to tell?They may be merley similar or they may be the same exact person and nature, we don't know either way.
You have not demonstrated the finity of any of those. And even if so, why would it suggest a capacity over nature? Also, what does that even mean?The finity of shapes, colors and other things suggest a capacity over nature including the human race.
What relativity are you talking about?Not just because they would look the same but because of a relativity.
How are they constructed?
and since this thread is on universal expansion, expansion of the universe, from the small, flaky water to the big, the universe;- It is modelled as six sided too, kind of, The radius of expansion projected around the perimeter, check the ALMA topic on alternative theories.Falling moisture freezes into six sided crystals
This forum used to be half decent. Now it's full of sneering quacks and trolls whose physics knowledge is scant, and who go round giving kids a hard time instead of helping them to learn. Meanwhile JamesR bans me from posting in the science forums. Because my posts are knowledgeable and laden with bona-fide references. Because I know more physics than him. What a charlatan. I will look out for you elsewhere, NotEinstein.Why would we be able to tell?
Um...This forum used to be half decent. Now it's full of sneering quacks and trolls whose physics knowledge is scant, and who go round giving kids a hard time instead of helping them to learn. Meanwhile JamesR bans me from posting in the science forums. Because my posts are knowledgeable and laden with bona-fide references. Because I know more physics than him. What a charlatan. I will look out for you elsewhere, NotEinstein.
I don't disagree with you there.This forum used to be half decent. Now it's full of sneering quacks and trolls whose physics knowledge is scant,
Another problem is that some "kids" seem to be beyond help.and who go round giving kids a hard time instead of helping them to learn.
I have nothing to do with that, but have you honestly self-reflected on that? I've so far had no problems with James R or any of the staff here.Meanwhile JamesR bans me from posting in the science forums.
May I suggest that if that's true, then perhaps the problem isn't with the content, but with the manner in which it is presented?Because my posts are knowledgeable and laden with bona-fide references.
(No opinion on these comments about James R.)Because I know more physics than him. What a charlatan.
Don't hold your breath, Farsight. You are not that important.I will look out for you elsewhere, NotEinstein.