VACIS

Doug Snell

Registered Member
VACIS is Variable Acceleration Contraction In a Spiral; it explains the redshift observed by Hubble/Key Project that indicate the universe is expanding at an increasing rate is actually contraction at an increasing rate (in a spiral) forced by gravity. Meaning, the universe is actually contracting at an increasing rate; not expanding in defiance of gravity and requiring dark energy etc.

You can find details explaining VACIS here: https://snelltoe.quora.com



Please review VACIS and the ToE (
) if you care to and let me know your thoughts/comments.
Thanks
douG
 
Interesting but I think probably wrong and not in agreement with the current model.
Others may be more critical I suspect.
Alex
 
Interesting but I think probably wrong and not in agreement with the current model.
Others may be more critical I suspect.
Alex
Thanks for your comments. Please think about it and its logical conclusions and implications; if you have other constructive comments i would appreciate them. douG
 
I don't want to watch a video or read you paper. How about a brief explanation since this is a discussion forum.
 
Watching the video and reviewing the paper is the typical approach to review. Discussion, for the sake of reiterating what is contained in the paper or video is duplication and questions can arise from simple omission of all the information contained in the presented. Out of respect and convenience the information is sited and offered; to date most interested parties ask for such rather than discussing prior to review etc...

A brief explanation is VACIS explains the 'redshift' data interpreted to mean the universe is 'expanding at an increasing rate'; effectively nullifying 'expansion' beliefs about the universe.
The ToE employs VACIS to explain the universe is contracting (by gravity) at an increasing rate; a natural system and result of mass and gravity; the universe is a natural contraction system (entropy) and a totality of the contraction natural systems within it: planets/stars, black holes, galaxies, cluster, superclusters all are natural contraction systems. The 'contraction' at an increasing rate within a spiral universe is what causes the 'redshift' observed and interpreted as 'expansion'.

The ToE with VACIS eliminates the need for dark energy and dark matter, and once understood, helps the sciences to advance with a better understanding of the universe.
 
A brief explanation is VACIS explains the 'redshift' data interpreted to mean the universe is 'expanding at an increasing rate'; effectively nullifying 'expansion' beliefs about the universe.
In what way? How does it explain it?
 
In what way? How does it explain it?
It shows how the redshift is created by: being inside the spiral that is accelerating (by gravity). As galaxies accelerate inside the spiral, they appear to be moving away from each other, simple because each is accelerating due to their unique proximity, which makes it appear each are expanding away form each other. Though the light shows us expanding at an increasing rate away from each other, it only light related, gravitationally we are contracting: see the sink spiral draining demonstration which is a similar effect, just in space rather than a fluid in a sink....

The paper explains and has the data/matrix information... its rather simple, just like the universe/physics. And it is all gravity driven...
 
Same here, and reported to boot, as obviously an alternative hypothetical at best or pseudoscience at worst.
Paddoboy, it easy to make blanket stmts like yours that lack any scientific input/result; and that is very unprofessional and disrespectful.

My post is for serious review and comments; pls keep it as such and keep the unprofessional to yourself/such.
douG
 
As galaxies accelerate inside the spiral, they appear to be moving away from each other, simple because each is accelerating due to their unique proximity, which makes it appear each are expanding away form each other.
I fail to see how galaxies accelerating in a spiral could cause a uniform redshift seen in the distant galaxies in all directions. Depending on our location in the spiral we would seen something much different such as part of the sky would have blue shifted galaxies and another part of the sky would have red shifted galaxies.
 
I fail to see how galaxies accelerating in a spiral could cause a uniform redshift seen in the distant galaxies in all directions. Depending on our location in the spiral we would seen something much different such as part of the sky would have blue shifted galaxies and another part of the sky would have red shifted galaxies.

Hi Origin,

Great, you are at least trying to understand. Please allow me to help.

Try to imagine being inside a spiral while the water is drawing from a sink. Those in front of you will be accelerating away from you (those closer to the drain/dominant gravitational mass go/accelerate faster). Those behind you, you accelerate away faster than they, making it appear they are moving away from you...that is simple to understand, straight line acceleration has each proximity appearing to be expanding away.

Now if inside a spiral, even those aside you will appear to be moving away; as all have a unique position and that unique position (proximity) dictates is acceleration (variable) to every other position/galaxy.
 
Last edited:
Hi Origin,

Great, you are at least trying to understand. Please allow me to help.

Try to imagine being inside a spiral while the water is drawing from a sink.
So you are talking about a vortex? Why and how could a vortex appear?
Those in front of you will be accelerating away from you (those closer to the drain/dominant gravitational mass go/accelerate faster). Those behind you, you accelerate away faster than they, making it appear they are moving away from you...that is simple to understand, straight line acceleration has each proximity appearing to be expanding away.
The galaxies that are orthogonal to your instantaneous direction of travel will have no, or very low red or blue shifts. Since that is not seen this seems to refute your idea.
Now if inside a spiral, even those aside you will appear to be moving away; as all have a unique position and that unique position (proximity) dictates is acceleration (variable) to every other position/galaxy.
I disagree. If you were inside the spiral there would be no red shift at all since at no time are the galaxies in the vortex moving away from you.

Another issue with your idea is that you are saying that the galaxies are moving through space and since it can be seen that the far distant galaxies can have a recession velocity >c, the galaxies must NOT be moving through space.
 
So you are talking about a vortex? Why and how could a vortex appear?

The vortex, is not shaped one side or another, we are so deep within the spiral, all galaxy are equally appearing to move away (with the exception of the chaos/variances explained). Again, put yourself inside an accelerating spiral, what would it appear like if you were in a constant acceleration to the drain in respect/relation to all others... you may not feel your acceleration but measured by light all would appear to be moving away, simply because all are accelerating variable to their proximity... at acceleration or a light speed you would appear to never be able to reach each other...but if you are speeding towards a singularity=the drain, you all would be in contraction, regardless of what it looks/light is like.

The galaxies that are orthogonal to your instantaneous direction of travel will have no, or very low red or blue shifts. Since that is not seen this seems to refute your idea.

The 'very low' is apparent, all around us; it is the Hubble cosmological constant....which is slow compared to light speed. It is equal all around us because the spiral is gradually accelerating, at the center of the universe it may be close to c, at the out universe spiral it may be still geodesic, all those in between are some where between geodesic and c...and each/our acceleration is based on proximity; as is every other galaxy/location: the ToE allows for cluster and superclusters....expansion can never explain clusters/superclusters.

I disagree. If you were inside the spiral there would be no red shift at all since at no time are the galaxies in the vortex moving away from you.

All are not moving away, they appear to be yet they are accelerating into contraction ---just like the redshift at an event horizon appears even though the galaxy is a contraction event- the universe spiral is same, The light is what is misperceived, gravitationally we are getting closer, not further, but light because is can only travel/indicate based on rate of travel, not based on proximity like gravity travels. Again the paper explains this as does the Gravity & Light series/papers provide details on gravity vs light differences/travel.. The video presents the VACIS, that is accepted by now; the spiral is the next huddle to understand.

Another issue with your idea is that you are saying that the galaxies are moving through space and since it can be seen that the far distant galaxies can have a recession velocity >c, the galaxies must NOT be moving through space.
Hmm, "can be seen that the far distant galaxies can have a recession velocity >c"... greater than speed of light??? within our observable portion of the universe, we see what the ToE explains, no matter appears at light speed or 'recession velocity greater than the speed of light", they just appear to be moving away...and eventually disappear because their light fails to reach us (see my Sphere of Observation video which explains the observable etc.)

Instead of attempting to defeat the VACIS and ToE explanations, try to understand them first... then get critical... once you understand it, the rest will fall into place and trying to defeat it will be gravitationally or logically impossible. It explains so much it will challenge what astro-cosmos science believes you have...tough to take when you believe expansion etc

I say this because many and i have tried, and none have defeated it... why, perhaps its the truth and explains the universe better than any theory prior to The ToE.

Please expand this response-- i answered some within your reply...thanks
douG
 
Hmm, "can be seen that the far distant galaxies can have a recession velocity >c"... greater than speed of light???
Correct.
within our observable portion of the universe, we see what the ToE explains, no matter appears at light speed or 'recession velocity greater than the speed of light",
Using your ToE to support your ToE is not very effective. Matter cannot move through space at the speed of light. There is no issue with expansion of space resulting in a recession velocity >c.
they just appear to be moving away...and eventually disappear because their light fails to reach us (see my Sphere of Observation video which explains the observable etc.)
The only way that galaxies would "eventually disappear because their light fails to reach us" is because the objects would be receeding faster than light or they would never disappear. Right? How could it be otherwise?
Instead of attempting to defeat the VACIS and ToE explanations, try to understand them first...
That is precisely why I am asking for clarification. You are not giving very revealing answers you are simply repeating yourself.
then get critical... once you understand it, the rest will fall into place and trying to defeat it will be gravitationally or logically impossible. It explains so much it will challenge what astro-cosmos science believes you have...tough to take when you believe expansion etc
I am not trying to 'defeat' your idea, I am trying to get you to convince me. You are not convincing me so far.
I say this because many and i have tried, and none have defeated it... why, perhaps its the truth and explains the universe better than any theory prior to The ToE.
Please expand this response-- i answered some within your reply...thanks
douG
If no one has been able to defeat your ideas they must be compelling.
I have only asked for clarification of your ideas. I have told you why I do not see how your ideas would result in a uniform red shift of distant galaxies, you have not attempted to tell my where my error is; this is the perfect place to present a compelling answer to my question.
 
Correct.

Using your ToE to support your ToE is not very effective. Matter cannot move through space at the speed of light. There is no issue with expansion of space resulting in a recession velocity >c.

Hmmm, Presently expansion belief thinks 'dark energy' pushing/forcing galaxies apart....and if you believe pushed to >c, then infinite energy w/b required to push whole galaxies at light speed (in defiance of gravity)...; that is not what is happening (see the ToE) the receding is do to light over distance not reaching us (same that happens at the event horizon just much further out over greater distance); it is not because the galaxy gravitationally pushing/moving at light speed away from us or every galaxy disappearing is moving at light speed away... that would mean expansion is happening at light speed in every direction around us if you go far enough out.... That is illogical by any physics/math....while requiring infinite dark energy (dark energy is something coming from nothing physics)

The only way that galaxies would "eventually disappear because their light fails to reach us" is because the objects would be receeding faster than light or they would never disappear. Right? How could it be otherwise? See my SoO sphere of observation... the faster we go, somewhere between geodesic and c, the less far out we see, at light speed all wee see is a spec of light in the direction of travel,,, from geodesic to SoL our sphere of observation shrinks.... i.e disappearing distant galaxies and VACIS but explain this phenomenon.

That is precisely why I am asking for clarification. You are not giving very revealing answers you are simply repeating yourself. Please excuse that perception of my answers; it clear to me, getting it across to others is not my forte....please be patient, as i expect others to find their truth, rather than being led etc.

I am not trying to 'defeat' your idea, I am trying to get you to convince me. You are not convincing me so far. Please excuse me, it is VACIS and the ToE that is convincing, i am but a well intending spirit trapped with mediocre mental capacity...

If no one has been able to defeat your ideas they must be compelling. They are compelling once you understand; many have and but the 'expansion' is dominant with in the science/academia/research; established beliefs are not easily changed nor being wrong readily admitted...understand what is afoot, and the implications of 90 years of believing 'expansion' of the universe has been happening, being changed to 'contraction at an increasing rate= by gravity and mass only, no dark energy and funny physics/math.

I have only asked for clarification of your ideas. I have told you why I do not see how your ideas would result in a uniform red shift of distant galaxies, you have not attempted to tell my where my error is; this is the perfect place to present a compelling answer to my question.

You are right, point taken.

The VACIS matrix data which is the redshift effects of being inside a contraction spiral in acceleration, is presented in the VACIS post (which this site won't let me drop it here),
when we match those to the HST Key Project data, it matches and all we have to do is plot the VACIS-Snell Effect on the Key Data graphs and it matches... meaning it explains the redshift in every direction and based on what we find out through research, we should be able to state within reason our rate of contraction/speed better...but for now we have explained the redshift while even in a contraction event: be it spiral galaxy or spiral universe, redshift does exist in both contraction events.

The VACIS matrix data is plotted on the HST Key Project data/graph... at the end of the VACIS paper; proving it matches and that can not be coincidence/ignored...
VACIS
VACIS = Variable Acceleration Contraction In a Spiral:
to exhibit the VACIS paper hereto a part/paper of Snell’s Theory of Everything (ToE).


VACIS Variable Acceleration Contraction In a Spiral
Variable Acceleration

Variable acceleration of galaxies creates redshift and the perception of expansion of space between galaxies.

A Galaxy’s Proximity + gravity equals Variable Acceleration (VA).

VA in a contracting spiral formation is: VACIS = variable acceleration contraction in a spiral universe. VACIS creates the ‘Snell Effect’.

VACIS happens: 1- between objects/galaxies 2- in spiral formation, 3- while within a contracting event i.e contracting universe. VA is based on proximity and gravity; like water spiral draining from a sink, the center moves faster. VA creates a ‘perception’ of expanding away from each other galaxy, i.e. expansion of space between galaxies.

Hubble’s Data-Constant, HST Key Project data, most redshift observed between galaxies, is VA induced; as space is measured by light and redshift=expansion; deductive reasoning leads to ‘expansion’ at increasing rate conclusions.

Please see the ToE- Paper titled Gravity & Light #7 -1 and #7 part 2 for a more detailed explanation of VACIS. The following simplifies VACIS:

main-qimg-a3f25bc7446381135db42bcc0e1320d3-c

Above- Universe in spiral formation, with a section of the spiral expanded.

Galaxies closer to the universe’s center are fastest, further are slowest.

Analyze and understand what happens to the observer’s perception-redshift while within a spiral. Observer observes everything expanding.

The above expanded cube exhibits VACIS simplified-explained. VACIS effects each galaxy based on its proximity-location within the spiral.

Below- explains the motion=VACIS within a spiral with acceleration values 0-6 assigned based on proximity/location on the x,y,z axis. The location of the Milky-way is 3,3,3 on x,y,z axis. see data matrix details.

main-qimg-f0d4f32228268f28998fdf47d4c8bfc6-c

The ToE via VACIS indicates most of the redshift between galaxies is a ‘perception’. The X, Y, Z acceleration values-data explain variable acceleration based on proximity. Higher value is more acceleration, or more redshift and more expansion; the further from the observer 3,3, the more the expansion (perception) attributed the VACIS. See (Hubble/HST Key Project data)

main-qimg-e5a865ad1041f4eaca8c9eb12588f060-c

Observer, the MW galaxy is 3,3,3 on the 3d cube-location. Being in an accelerating spiral formation even during a contraction event, exhibits or causes some observable redshift between galaxies. The data of the VACIS matrix confirms/predicts the HST Key Project conclusions/data. The maximum est. Snell Effect is plotted on the HST Key Project’s graph (see footnotes)

Therefore- 1-An accelerating contracting spiral of galaxies exhibits some redshift; i.e. most redshift exhibited by distant galaxies is due to VACIS.

2- The faster the contraction of the spiral universe, the more redshift observed; ergo the ‘perception’ of expansion at an increasing rate.

The exceptions, the chaos: There are variances in the amount of redshift exhibited. Andromeda-M31 exhibits blueshift. Galaxies may exhibit (variance) blueshift or redshift beyond the ‘Snell Effect’.

That variance is the ‘chaos’ between objects/galaxies within the spiral formation’s unison. A unison spiral universe is one where everything=galaxies are equally moving in relation/proximity to all other galaxies to form a ‘least contact’ before final contraction onto the singular mass/center.

Most galaxies will contract into clusters, superclusters etc before final contraction onto the singular mass/center; deductive reasoning is: more chaos and localized contraction than, unison/symmetry.

Yet all galaxies/mass have/has unison within the universal spiral in totality, as no galaxy escapes the universal spiral to the center mass.

Chaos is exhibited by a galaxy’s motion or direction in variance to the unison of the universal spiral formation. Some chaos is imminent, as many variables effect a galaxy’s composition, evolution and contraction. And, generally localized contraction is faster than universal. (see ‘localized contraction’ notes)

Blueshift observed indicates contraction towards the observer-Milky-way galaxy at a much higher rate than the universal contraction rate. Redshift beyond the Snell Effect, is a galaxy presently moving away faster than the universal spiral contraction rate or VACIS attributed redshift.


Ergo, Variable Acceleration Contraction In a Spiral; VACIS.

Hereto made part of the ToE papers, is to help explain VACIS & ToE:

Authored by douG 8-2016

Footnotes:

main-qimg-3ff3484a6ff97a6ca17f0611f02e305f-c

douG 8–19–2016 If it helps you understand, its a gift. ~~~~

Not for Reproduction
 
Paddoboy, it easy to make blanket stmts like yours that lack any scientific input/result; and that is very unprofessional and disrespectful.

My post is for serious review and comments; pls keep it as such and keep the unprofessional to yourself/such.
douG
No my friend, I stick to science.
Your first problem of course is was posting this in the wrong section: I'm sure it is clear enough, that we do have sections for established sciences, and sections for alternative hypothesis. Understand?
Secondly, we probably have many dozens of alternative hypothesis proposed anyway, by the many Tom, Dick and Harry's that these types of forums are open to. And of course as I'm fond of telling most of these individuals with their alternative hypothesis, if they really had anything of value or a concrete nature, they would not be here...
Yes, you have an hypothesis, nothing more, nothing less: At this stage, no I'm not prepared to read it, and believe like the thousands and thousands of other grandeur ideas that have been expressed on science forums before you, it is probably just a waste of cyber space.
 
No my friend, I stick to science.
Your first problem of course is was posting this in the wrong section: I'm sure it is clear enough, that we do have sections for established sciences, and sections for alternative hypothesis. Understand?
Secondly, we probably have many dozens of alternative hypothesis proposed anyway, by the many Tom, Dick and Harry's that these types of forums are open to. And of course as I'm fond of telling most of these individuals with their alternative hypothesis, if they really had anything of value or a concrete nature, they would not be here...
Yes, you have an hypothesis, nothing more, nothing less: At this stage, no I'm not prepared to read it, and believe like the thousands and thousands of other grandeur ideas that have been expressed on science forums before you, it is probably just a waste of cyber space.
Hi Paddoboy,

Thanks, but no thanks for your "many Tom, Dick and Harry's that these types of forums are open to" comment, or as you describe 'waste of cyber space'.
Science is neither such comments or waste of: the subject is perhaps, beyond you.
 
Science is neither such comments or waste of: the subject is perhaps, beyond you.
I'm an amateur, sure, but my points stand. If you really had anything of such a monumental nature, you would not be here.
What are your own credentials?
 
Back
Top