Virgin Birth Confirmed

Status
Not open for further replies.
The "female" athlete that goose mentioned wasn't XXY, they were an XY male who had a genetic problem that caused their body to not respond to testosterone in the normal way. This causes people to develop bodies that appear to have female reproductive organs, but in many ways their bone and muscle structure is still male (making them superior to most female athletes). They can't reproduce because although they appear to have a vagina, they don't actually have any internal female reproductive organs (ovaries/uterus/eggs/etc).

That i didnt know
Thanks for the clarification :D
 
You would've said the same of sharks last week and you would've been wrong.

No where in the article does it suggest that the hammerhead gave birth to either a male OR female.

Parthenogenesis that gives rise to a male is entirely dependent on the sex-determination mechanism. In humans, the chance of getting a male from a female would be astonishingly low, given how much DNA would pretty much have to come from nowhere. In some reptiles and birds, where temperature determines gender, it would not be surprising at all to have parthenogenically produced males.
 
No where in the article does it suggest that the hammerhead gave birth to either a male OR female.

Parthenogenesis that gives rise to a male is entirely dependent on the sex-determination mechanism. In humans, the chance of getting a male from a female would be astonishingly low, given how much DNA would pretty much have to come from nowhere. In some reptiles and birds, where temperature determines gender, it would not be surprising at all to have parthenogenically produced males.

Or birds I suppose sense it is the female that determines the sex of the offspring.
 
IAC said:
Just because you weren't alive at the time does not mean the observation did not take place.
There's no record of any such observation at any time.

For one thing, adequate means for observing parthenogenesis in free-living humans only came into existence in my lifetime.
 
Yes there is a record. It's recorded history. You should learn how to read and then read a book called the Holy Bible. There the observation is recorded.

:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao: The bible. You you serious? You have got to be shitting me. You seriously believe that the bible is actually factual history? There is nothing in history of virgin births in humans nor for that matter in any primates to my knowledge.
 
:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao: The bible. You you serious? You have got to be shitting me. You seriously believe that the bible is actually factual history? There is nothing in history of virgin births in humans nor for that matter in any primates to my knowledge.
Do you believe in Egypt?
 
You believe in Egypt but it's in the Bible. How is that possible?

and you fail. You believe in virgin birth because its in the bible even though its not anywhere else. I believe in Egypt because of the mountains of archeological evidence that supports ancient Egypt and it so happens the people who wrote the bible decided to mention Egypt. You don't see the glaring difference between these 2 things?
 
Did you read the OP? Do you know what a shark is?

Nice try on trying to cover your ass but as with most things you try to do you failed epically. Yes i read the OP and yes I know what a shark is. Neither of which as anything to do with your belief in the virgin birth as in the bible as fact.
 
Nice try on trying to cover your ass but as with most things you try to do you failed epically. Yes i read the OP and yes I know what a shark is. Neither of which as anything to do with your belief in the virgin birth as in the bible as fact.


Bible is gods word... you better start believing in it buddy or you won't be save by Jesus.:shrug:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top