i think the pro-active war by U.S. was the right decision,
Fair enough. That is what you believe then so be it.
if you are out there trying to catch terrorists;
And how has that capture of Bin Laden gone? You know, the terrorist who actually attacked you and your interests overseas, who actually posed a direct threat to said interests and your own country.. How's that going by the way?
You attacked a country under the guise that they had weapons of mass destruction. Yet none existed, a fact stated by other nations around the world. UN inspectors who'd been on the ground in Iraq stated quite frankly that such weapons did not exist in Iraq. But you went in anyway under that little banner. When it became obvious that no such weapons existed, you changed your tune and stated that you went in to free Iraq and to end terrorism. The fact that you failed to ask the people of Iraq if they wanted to be freed is ironic, and the fact that you invaded their country to free them, only to now have them living under military rule is even more ironic. But the most pathetic aspect of this? You brought terrorism into Iraq. You allowed it to enter the country. Iraq now is literally a magnet to terrorist groups such as Al Qeada who have a personal agenda against the US. The result? Iraq is now a hell hole where innocent Iraqi civilians are paying the price for your war on terror.. for your war against terrorists who have now flooded into their country to fight against you. So much for you claims of catching terrorists huh? You've allowed terrorists to gain such a foothold in Iraq that the Iraq people will not only face occupation from you, but also continued attacks from the terrorists who have gone there to fight against the US and her allies. Well done! You've taken a country ruled by a despot, turned it into a military occupied nation and opened it up to foreign terrorists who wish to attack you.
they would turn to hostile nations like iraq and eventuaally bomb states; every nation must protect itself;
The person and his organisation who had already bombed the States is still running around bombing innocent civilians and your interests in Iraq. And how exactly will Iraq now protect itself to the attacks you have brought upon it? The allied forces has been hopeless in protecting the civilians. How can a nation protect itself when it is occupied by a country led by someone who has to be the dumbest president to have ever graced the White House? How can the US now protect itself now that its invasion into Iraq has increased the risk of their facing even more terrorist attacks?
all those Liberals are Communists god dammit; if communists were treated the same way, we would have been ruled by Stalins grandsons and we all know what kind of rights U.S.S.R. had.
Secret prisons, torture as forms of interrogations, people held without trial in jails and without legal representation, etc? Hmmm has a familiar sound to it doesn't it? Hey I know, isn't that what Bush has now done in the US?
so yeah, it all boils down to freedom and democracy.
Refer to above in regards to secret prisons, torture, being imprisoned without the right to a trial or legal representation. Is this now the new catch cry for the US's claims of 'freedom and democracy'?
i fail to understand why world never appreciates what U.S. does.
Exhibit A: Iraq.
Hezbollah is a terror group which will become a threat; so yea it must eliminated; does that mean U.S,. is against religion of islam? hell no. Its only terror americans are fighting.
And terror they inflict in doing so. It's like the blind leading the blind.
and yeah president bush is honest in doing and making tough decisions and not pussying out like Bill clinton in last moments when they could have killed bin laden;
And Bush and his father, when he was president, have done better? HEH!
