please SHOW this to be true--simple, correct?In essence the majority of the public [and science] is disinterested in UFO sightings [after initial credulous reactions] simply because most are explained by more mundane means.
please SHOW this to be true--simple, correct?In essence the majority of the public [and science] is disinterested in UFO sightings [after initial credulous reactions] simply because most are explained by more mundane means.
Fosters? VB? [Just forget the straw and make sure its chilled.[Too late!
I'm going for beer.
please SHOW how i am wrong--simple correct?Wrong again,
except the conflict-ion is the opposite by " officials", so now what?the issues that have lead to the official conclusion that we have no conclusive evidence of any Alien visitations
except according to logic, none can say that there is no conclusive evidence due to the scientific process, so now what?is dictated by logic, common sense reasoning, and the scientific method which entails those.
whom cares ? (shrugs)I'll leave him to you, as I have some science articles to check out.
please explain how you are not--- simple, correct?I'm not.
Maybe you're not so smart or open enough to figure it out.
Didn't you say:please explain how you are not--- simple, correct?
i have no interest for your ditzy-ness.
Yeah, well - YOU'RE A SUCKY FACE!ahh-- i see, more of your pathetic ditzy-ness. (shrugs)
My favorite beer is STELLA ARTOIS.Fosters? VB? [Just forget the straw and make sure its chilled.[
uh-huh-- (shakes head)Yeah, well - YOU'RE A SUCKY FACE!
As of this date. we have no conclusive evidence, that the Earth has ever been visited, nor any direct evidence that life even exists elsewhere at any level.
Riv, I'm not sure you realize how damning such a response is.Just a statement of ignorance .
Yes, yes. You've spammed that null argument over ten times in the last three pages.again, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE. (shakes head)
Here's 47c to make it an even $13But I'm going to bet myself 12 dollars and 53 cents that you do no such thing.
except this has already occurred , years ago--so now what?If you know of any conclusive evidence, please feel free to put it out where we can all sheepishly bow in deference.
simply because that they need some sort of a clue of what they " spew " about, correct?You put the onus on others to "go and search". Why?