Ah of course. Has it been proven false?
No, it has been proven to be true, the film maker most certainly wants to make money from this belief.
Ah of course. Has it been proven false?
No, it has been proven to be true, the film maker most certainly wants to make money from this belief.
I find it very interesting that those who make such claims about the non-existence of Jesus are unwilling to look into claims of his existence. Why is that?
Good, I am glad you will make no more uneducated references to the absence of any evidence of the existence of Jesus.
We'll also continue to search for the existence of visiting aliens because another crop circle turned up and someone made the claim to the existence of visiting aliens, as that is, according to Sam, an "educated reference."
BTW what was found was an ossary containing a few bones. THen the speculation started. Could these bones have been contemporary with Jesus ? Let's date them ! Give or take a bit, they could have been contemporary with Jesus.
Cynical voiceover : " They could have been contemporary witrh anyone who lived at that time. In fact, they have to be contemporary with something or other."
Ah, but the incsription ! It looks as if the name could be Jesus or something very close to Jesus.
Cynical voiceover: "Fred is not close to Jesus but how about Jerome, Jeremiah, Josephus, etc. Here we encounter a small priblem. Vowels were not written so the consonants could have more than one meaning. "
Presenter: " Next week we shall examine the question of whether the Risen Christ had eaten yeast before he ascended into heaven to sit on his own right-hand side. "
Yes, we will, at least some of us will. I read an article in Science where they found two unidentified hairs of a yet to be identified primate in some part of northern India. May be the proverbial yeti.
Perhaps the DNA results will show-unknown. Does this mean it is contrived folklore for the gullible?
gb-God gets to set the rules for what is just. He asks us to choose Him, with the admonition that if we don't we are going to Hell.
GB-nope
gb-God gets to set the rules for what is just. He asks us to choose Him, with the admonition that if we don't we are going to Hell.
Yes, we will, at least some of us will. I read an article in Science where they found two unidentified hairs of a yet to be identified primate in some part of northern India. May be the proverbial yeti.
Have you seen the documentary?
And you are sure that you know exactly what those rules are that God set?
GB-nope
Then how can you claim this -
-?
What is the point talking about following God's rules, if you don't know exactly what those rules are?
jesus was the truth personified. rejecting jesus means to reject the truth and acceptance of jesus means to accept the truth and be truthful. jesus was also good personified.
What exactly constitutes a rejection of Jesus?
What is it that a person would need to do in order for that action to be considered a rejection of Jesus?
What exactly constitutes acceptance of Jesus?
What is it that a person would need to do in order for that action to be considered an acceptance of Jesus?
To accept Jesus is to believe Jesus. To believe Jesus one must first believe that Jesus is. Not as some historical figure who had some nice thoughts and a bad attitude towards the authorities of the time that got Him killed, no. But as the only begotten Son of God who by His death and resurrection has won for those who believe Him, atonement of all sins and eternity with God.
All Praise The Ancient Of Days