RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
"want" vs "need"I have to either sit up or strain my neck to look at the screen.
"want" vs "need"I have to either sit up or strain my neck to look at the screen.
Thing is most of you have problably spent over 20 minutes negging instead of watching the video.I bet I know more about electricity than you. Chemists tend to know a certain amount of physics.
Seriously, this is a discussion forum. If you want to raise an issue for discussion, raise it in your own words, here on the forum, where we can debate it. Like most readers, I am not going to waste 20 minutes watching what on the face of it is a crap video for the credulous. You may not realise it, but those of us who have been around a while are wearily familiar with the pyramids being used for all manner of preposterous crank notions. This looks like just another one - and in fact one of the more ridiculous.
So yes, we will go on negging your thread until you can be bothered to put your arse in gear and express in words, for yourself, what the argument (if there is one) is, for us to read quickly here.
Not embarassed, just lazy. It would take me more time to transcribe than it would for you to watch the video.He's actually too embarrassed to put forward the ideas mentioned in the video. Act in haste, repent ... nah, that's unlikely.
From the Wiki article it seems uncertain: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_pyramid_construction_techniquesanyone know how they lifted 70 ton stones ?
No it took about 2 mins. But there's a general point here about forum etiquette, which makes it worthwhile for me to respond to you. It is lazy and bad manners to demand that people watch lengthy YouTube videos, instead of summarising an argument yourself in words, especially when, as we we all know, YouTube is full of junk. If you can't be bothered to explain the argument, why should we be bothered to waste 20 minutes on what is most likely a junk video, just on the recommendation of someone on the internet who may very well be a nutcase?Thing is most of you have problably spent over 20 minutes negging instead of watching the video.
Dont know if you are all from america but nowadays everyone is so adhd, always on their phones 24/7.
Not embarassed, just lazy. It would take me more time to transcribe than it would for you to watch the video.
Pathetic.Not embarassed, just lazy. It would take me more time to transcribe than it would for you to watch the video.
Cleopatra's Needle didn't need miracles to be erected, just wood, sand, and lots of labor.anyone know how they lifted 70 ton stones ?
you maybe have not seen the extended internal surveys of the great pyramids.Cleopatra's Needle didn't need miracles to be erected, just wood, sand, and lots of labor.
Well, either they figured out a mundane way to do it, which would be the way to bet.
OR IT WAS ALIENS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm a life-long atheist.USA christian brainwashing...
only 2 options
beleive in jesus as i tell you and you do what i say
or
you beleive in everything else and are a crazy person
You could try my latest invention: Google.if you do have an actual explanation for that i would be very keen to read it.
Could be human made, anti-grav?Well, either they figured out a mundane way to do it, which would be the way to bet.
OR IT WAS ALIENS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lots of hot egyptian women, to boost their testosterone?anyone know how they lifted 70 ton stones ?
Im not an electrician, I figured an electrician would have easier time just watching the video than debating the likely numerous errors of my transcription.The converse of this is that, if you can put together a coherent argument about it, that will be useful evidence that you are somebody worth corresponding with - and a decent debate may then ensue.
We're the cockroaches that they left behind.maybe the ancient humans left and colonized other planets, and they took their tech with them, and we are some kind of social experiment to them.
I get the impression that he is unable to extract the main points from the video. He talks about transcribing the whole thing, which is mere copying. What is needed first is comprehension - extracting the most pertinent information from the video. The ability to sum up the main arguments for the benefit of readers here would also be useful.He's actually too embarrassed to put forward the ideas mentioned in the video.
That would be von Daniken's big ass light bulb thingy. It's not a light bulb, of course, but if one lacks scholarship then it sure seems like one. The fact that the infrastructure to support electrical distribution has never been found is oddly ignored.On topic: if the contention is that the Ancient Egyptians knew how to control and use electricity, it would be good to hear at least one piece of evidence that supports that contention.
Its just, now I have to watch the video twice, while y'all won't even watch the video once.On topic: if the contention is that the Ancient Egyptians knew how to control and use electricity, it would be good to hear at least one piece of evidence that supports that contention.