Please explain.
Ah, so now you can't read and comprehend that English language? ...and yet you were "offended" earlier? ...LOL!!
Baron Max
Please explain.
Ah, so now you can't read and comprehend that English language? ...and yet you were "offended" earlier? ...LOL!!
Baron Max
Please explain.
I'm giving you an opportunity to explain, I think you know what I mean. I can comprehend quite well, thank you.
A good thing? Why? What good does it to to introduce abnormal kids into a classroom? What is the purpose of that disruption?
What good are those kids to the society? In almost all cases, they end up being a burden on society. Hell, we even shoot horses when they break legs, yet we keep retarded kids forever! Is there no logic being used whatsoever?
Ain't my problem, they ain't my kids! And I think that's an important point. Normal people didn't have any say in having those kids, so why should they have to foot the bill to pay for them?
And normal school taxes are for normal kids educations, NOT for edcuating or caring for the retarded or disabled who require lots of additional care and special facilities.
Well, they can't ....because if they could, without any special care or facilities, then we wouldn't be talking about them here! This thread is about disabled and/or retarded kids that require extra care, additional, special facilities, etc.
Baron Max
compulsory child insurance for all those intending on having children.
if they have children and don't have insurance then they get nothing.
the ultimate user pays society like the republican party wish to have.
we should not have any over population problems in the west because the average person cant afford to have kids and pay for their education.
given the fact that a child with learning disabilities or some type of illness/birth defect costs many times more and the family can never afford to pay for it the community must pay through tax.
how can you claim ownership of something that other people are paying to support ?
socialism
are you seriously saying Max that only abnormal people have children with disabilities? Because i can tell you for fact now, that you are wrong,
No, where did you get that???????
But whoever has those kids with "problems" should take care of those problems on their own! It's not society's kid, it's their kid.
Baron Max
No, where did you get that???????
But whoever has those kids with "problems" should take care of those problems on their own! It's not society's kid, it's their kid.
Baron Max
Well, society benefits from people having children.
If people have problems resulting from a disabled child, shouldn't they expect some help.
Isn't that just fair?
compulsory child insurance for all those intending on having children.
if they have children and don't have insurance then they get nothing.
the ultimate user pays society like the republican party wish to have.
we should not have any over population problems in the west because the average person cant afford to have kids and pay for their education.
given the fact that a child with learning disabilities or some type of illness/birth defect costs many times more and the family can never afford to pay for it the community must pay through tax.
how can you claim ownership of something that other people are paying to support ?
socialism
to a certain degree you are right, however the child needs an education.
....people who are unempolyed, or cannot work for various reasons allbeit illness or whatever, that they need to support themselves?
Education for what purpose? If the kids are normal enough to be educated and live normal lives, then those are NOT the kids I'm talking about. I'm talking about grossly disabled and/or mentally retarded.
Charities. It's not the government's task to care for any and all kids or anyone else. Gov is for the COMMON good, not for individuals!
Baron Max
... If people have problems resulting from a disabled child, shouldn't they expect some help. Isn't that just fair?
They should get exactly the same "help" as every other kid in the society. If they need more, there are charities for that purpose. But it's NOT the responsibility of the gov ......that's for COMMON good, not individuals.
Baron Max
then i want all the taxes i have paid back because i dont want to look after the common good just my family? is that right?
Nope, you don't have that choice ...you're a member of that society whether you like it or not. If you want to move to Iran or Afghanistan, then you can probably do it, but....
Hey, LA, what do you think the Afghans do with disabled and/or mentally retarded kids?
Baron Max
They should get exactly the same "help" as every other kid in the society. If they need more, there are charities for that purpose. But it's NOT the responsibility of the gov ......that's for COMMON good, not individuals.
Baron Max
When the Government acts, it acts in the COMMON good, but every time it acts it acts to help individuals.
Some people need more help than others, some need no help at all.
Some need no help and like to help others without the Government. That's charity.