We've had a similar thread on this before regarding the RuBisCo enzyme. I thought those interested in green plants would enjoy the thread:
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=105780
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=105780
I have, from time to time, been asked the question why I waste my time on people that are so obviously trolls.I think one of the most fascinating aspects to reading sciforums is the crackpot, troll, delusional rambler aspect to the occasional post. Of course, the primary reason for me reading (as I have for several years) is the incredible wealth of knowledge that is able to be tapped on such a huge variety of subjects. So, for me, the lengthy posts on this subject have been interesting yet, I'm even more interested in the continued responses from the original poster. I don't understand people like this... at all. I'm not sure what continues to motivate their responses after their obvious avoidance of repeated relevant engagement on their topic. It's like they have no sense of shame... to boil it down. I can't honestly believe it's as simple as being a debate tactic, as they are intelligent enough to engage in a cursory manner, therefore, the obvious must be at least, somewhat discernible. Delusion is not a consideration for me either, as they specifically avoid the "meat and potatoes" of the topic when presented. Any insight? I've given up on Esbo addressing the main topic.
I have, from time to time, been asked the question why I waste my time on people that are so obviously trolls.
For what it's worth (and to be perfectly frank) as often as not it's not for their benefit, but the benefit of 'third parties' who may be reading this thread and not commenting, or come across this thread at some future date.
When I went through Highschool, my teachers encouraged me to ask questions, because you can gaurantee that for everyperson that asks a question, there's ten others thinking it.
That you put considerable effort into your posts is obvious, Trippy, and no doubt greatly appreciated by the 'silent majority' of people who frequent this forum.
Observable that there are usually hundreds of people viewing threads, while often only a few dozen are posting.
You had good teachers in high school, by your comment made. My teachers also stressed the point that the only 'dumb question' was the one that never got asked.
Black would be better.
Where is the little mouse anyway?
Esbo. Where are you? I have some cheese for you.
Been doing a spot of gardening, having some trouble with plants that are struggling, the leaves are turning yellow.
I am not sure why, I think it is because the sol is poor or too wet, not sure why that makes the leaves lose their colour.
Maybe they can take up nutrients.
I added potassium (Epsom salts) as potassium is in chlorophyll, but then so is nitrogen.
I think the problem is the soil is heavy and air can't get to the the roots.
Dogs have a modest array of color receptors. Nothing like ours, but more than enough to not qualify as color-blind.If dogs are truly 'color-blind' plants most likely apprear various shades of gray.
Dogs have a modest array of color receptors. Nothing like ours, but more than enough to not qualify as color-blind.
Wolves happily hunt in the daylight. Evolution has adapted cats much more thoroughly to being nocturnal predators. Night scenes appear six times brighter to them than they do to us. But in the daytime they probably see everything as slightly differentiated pastels.
You probably have a potash problem . You will know if you start to get cellular collapse on your Tomato plants , but typically your foliage will look real good until the stems start to collapse from there own weight, or more likely it could be to much nitration . Over feeding will lead to yellow leafage . Over watering also like you said will drowned the plant and cause yellowing on the leaf . Good luck with that
Thanks for that, the plants are actually tobacco plants. (similar to tomato).
I have tried various thinks but nothing much has worked particularly well.
I have stopped watering for a start but I did give them a little today as I was
adding some sulphate of ammonia which is supposed to be good for foliage.
The plants were OK when in pots of compost, the problem seemed to occur when I put them in the mainly clay soil or bigger pots with clay. I also started using a liquid fertiliser at that point, but I have stopped that now as I am also worried it could be over fertilisation, however it only affected the pots with clay so that seems unlikely. I was thinking the clay was blocking the drainage.
I had a look at the roots of one pot that was affected and they were white ie not black and rotted. Anyway I am not expecting much it was just and experiment really to see if they would grow.
The plants were OK when in pots of compost, the problem seemed to occur when I put them in the mainly clay soil or bigger pots with clay. I also started using a liquid fertiliser at that point, but I have stopped that now as I am also worried it could be over fertilisation, however it only affected the pots with clay so that seems unlikely. I was thinking the clay was blocking the drainage.
SourceMost soils will suit your plants, with the exception of heavy clay which needs breaking up with peat. Tobacco even thrives on poor sandy soil where other plants often fail. Plenty of water must be available as tobacco plants are a thirsty crop. You will find that your second year's crop will adjust to your soil and conditions and often produce better tobacco.
Clay don't take water well and when it does it don't dry out . It is good for grasses but not to much more . Strawberry will grow good in clay . Maybe you need a little sand and gravel mixed in the soil
Source
Also, fertilizing with apatite, which has the net effect of starving the plants of nitrogen improves the flavour, apparently.