does that work with your religion?
Sure, we don't question why, we just try to figure out how.
does that work with your religion?
Sure, we don't question why, we just try to figure out how.
you're confusing me a lot
Science cannot answer why, only how.
In science how is why. :scratchin:
She means that science cannot answer questions of sentient intent applied 'behind' behavior
s of reality... in other words science cannot answer stupid questions.
not stupid questions, just stupid scientists like bugs trying to comprehend the universe.
In science how is why. :scratchin:
She means that science cannot answer questions of sentient intent applied 'behind' behaviors of reality... in other words science cannot answer stupid questions.
Yes, that is the real question because by asking asking the question the implication exists that the answer isn't obvious (otherwise, why ask). In light of the fact that the question is preposterously easy to answer it negates its feasibility as the real question (since difficulty in answering it is inherent in the asking). Since the question you asked is not the real question I submit that the real question is why evolution would give men nipples, since they are, as you state, "useless." Why would something useless get selected for?No that is not the real question because I didn't ask that question.
1. He likes how they look.Now can you answer the question or not? why did your god give us useless crap such as nipples on a male and tail bones?
not stupid questions, just stupid scientists like bugs trying to comprehend the universe.
Grapes are sour.
So are orange cats.
did he told you this??God never knows if he's gonna make a male or female... he has not made up his mind, he makes it up as he goes along.
Great point!"“Your so-called ‘answer’ on male nipples simply side-steps the real question. Why would God create male animals with nipples? Did Adam have nipples? Surely not, as Eve hadn't even been thought about at that stage.